Boris Popov wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2000, A G F Keahan wrote:
This may be a silly question, but is there such a thing?Almost every
program that I know uses configuration files, often in different,
incompatible formats. I personally prefer Samba/Wine-style config
files which are
At 5:54 PM -0700 5/28/00, Brian O'Shea wrote:
You are right, this could be done, but I wouldn't call it
trivial. I've always come to the conclusion that the interface
to something like this would have to be kind of complex in order
to keep it generic enough to be really useful. For instance,
Hi,
I would like to know how to get time of the day in side kernel. When I
used gettimeofday() in side kernel, it was giving panic on 3.3 FreeBSD
release. It didnt panic on 3.1-RELEASE. So what is the problem?
Can I use gettimeofday() inside kernel? if so why 3.3 is panicking? Ifnot
why 3.1 is
Can I use gettimeofday() inside kernel? if so why 3.3 is panicking? Ifnot
why 3.1 is not panicking?
It's called "microtime()" in the kernel.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Hmm. I think booteasy will allow you to put FreeBSD on a second disk. That
way you can have n-way booting, where n is limited only by the number of
OS's on the market today. :-)
Kees Jan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the
A G F Keahan wrote:
Which does not necessarily make it bad, of course, it's just nice to
separate things out. Many UNIX applications use similar formats; you
don't have to go very far to find an example -- look at e.g.
/etc/defaults/rc.conf, which has distinct sections separated by
Wes Peters wrote:
I'm really want to make this thing generic and unite it with
others config file parsers (if memory serves me right, Daniel Sobral wrote
RW version for rc.conf style files).
Not needed, there is such a parser library included in OpenSSL, which
is included in
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:00:37AM +0200, A G F Keahan wrote:
This may be a silly question, but is there such a thing?Almost every
program that I know uses configuration files, often in different,
incompatible formats. I personally prefer Samba/Wine-style config
man 3 property
for a
Hi:
The md pseudo-device does work as described in the handbook in section
10.6.2.
However it doesn't seem to work when I try to use a device other than
/dev/md0, specifically /dev/md1.
Some other pseudo-devices can be specified in the kernel configuration
with a number to indicate the number
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 12:53:59AM -0600, Wes Peters wrote:
A better choice might be found in XML. Exploring the port of libxml
(in ports/textproc) might be enlightening.
XML is almost certainly a better option.. the more I look at it,
the more I think it will cover most all of the config
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to link object
files which were compiled under Linux on a FreeBSD system.
Background:
I have to extend a programm for which I only got
the object Files. This programm calls functions
I have to write. As I don't have a
Ade Lovett wrote:
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 12:53:59AM -0600, Wes Peters wrote:
A better choice might be found in XML. Exploring the port of libxml
(in ports/textproc) might be enlightening.
XML is almost certainly a better option.. the more I look at it,
the more I think it will cover
At 06:36 PM 5/27/00 -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
Existing bus abstractions tend to let think that the same software driver
can deal with different buses, bridges or IO methods without having to
care about how these things actually behave, notably regarding buffering
and ordering rules. This is
At 07:30 PM 5/27/00 -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
Dennis wrote:
At 09:54 AM 5/27/00 +0200, John Hay wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dennis writes:
: My 4.0 system doesnt probe ISA devices on my system.
:
: Whats the trick? Is there a config requirement with old-style
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dennis writes:
Uhm, the very fact that you are too simple-minded to understand the
new, flexible, structured, high-performance bus architecture is sad.
That you take it out on the people reading -current is beyond sad.
If you can't behave like an adult shut up
d_f0rce writes:
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
Hi,
Background:
I have to extend a programm for which I only got
the object Files. This programm calls functions
I have to write. As I don't have a Linux system
at home I would like to use those object-files
Hi,
I'm trying to rip CDDA from an ATAPI cdrom device. So first I tried
using cdd from /usr/ports. No dice, the resulting file is static.
Next I searched for an alternative and found daex. Since I'm running
FreeBSD-4.0-RELEASE the kernel mods the author describes are outdated.
I modified the
Dennis wrote:
At 07:30 PM 5/27/00 -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
Dennis wrote:
At 09:54 AM 5/27/00 +0200, John Hay wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dennis writes:
: My 4.0 system doesnt probe ISA devices on my system.
:
: Whats the trick? Is there a config requirement
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Dennis wrote:
At 06:36 PM 5/27/00 -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
Existing bus abstractions tend to let think that the same software driver
can deal with different buses, bridges or IO methods without having to
care about how these things actually behave, notably regarding
* G.B.Naidu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000529 04:58] wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
It depends on how you call it, look at the sendfile implementation and
see how it has to call writev(), userland_writev() != kernel_writev(),
you need to munge with the arguements.
I am in the process of upgrading my Turtle Beach MultiSound Monterey
soundcard device driver (msm) from the 3.x version available from
http://www.treefort.org/~bobkat/msm_main.shtml
to 4.0-RELEASE. While crawling over the learning curve of the new-bus
system I've been bit by the following.
In
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dennis writes:
: The best "portable" coding method is with memory-mapped registers, which
: seems to have been omitted from this "implementation", which is the gripe
: here.
SYS_RES_MEMORY does exactly this. What are you talking about? I'm
using this in 5
Sergey Babkin wrote:
Steven Alexander wrote:
I've had problems getting Windows NT to boot using bootloaders from other
OSes. I'd suggest installing NT last and putting it on the first partition.
The partition number does not really matter, what really matters is
that Windows wants
23 matches
Mail list logo
