Denial of Service and kernel panic (out of mbuf) appears when following
program executes (originally reported by Sven Berkenvs
([EMAIL PROTECTED])). Affects FreeBSD 3.x 4.0, OpenBSD 2.5, OpenBSD 2.6,
NetBSD 1.4.1.
#include unistd.h
#include sys/socket.h
#include fcntl.h
#define BUFFERSIZE
* Oleg Derevenetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000603 23:35] wrote:
Denial of Service and kernel panic (out of mbuf) appears when following
program executes (originally reported by Sven Berkenvs
([EMAIL PROTECTED])). Affects FreeBSD 3.x 4.0, OpenBSD 2.5, OpenBSD 2.6,
NetBSD 1.4.1.
[snip]
---
On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Intel has furnished us with IA-64 hardware and a porting effort is
already underway. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you would like to
help out in some way with the process.
What can those of us just out here do?
That depends on what
I have made available the following `sym' driver patch for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~groudier/sym-1.6.0-2604.diffs
This patch is against driver version in -current. Changes are pretty
trivial and mostly nil-potent for ia32, but it seemed to me they may
need some testings
On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Intel has furnished us with IA-64 hardware and a porting effort is
already underway. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you would like to
help out in some way with the process.
What can those of us just out here do?
I believe HP provides
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 01:18:39AM +0800, Belldandy wrote:
Is there any effort(or at least, any thought) on making an
IA-64 port of FreeBSD? It seems Intel is trying to push IA-64
to be 'the platform' for servers and workstations, and I think
FreeBSD definitely can't be left out
Hi,
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
However you do it, please fix this ASAP, and be it by reverting the
original, broken patch!
I wish but I can't. If I'll touch those misterious CVS branches structure
again, everyone shoot at me as in previous time. I think it is enough for
me. Nowdays some
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:12:22AM -0400, Will Andrews wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 01:18:39AM +0800, Belldandy wrote:
Is there any effort(or at least, any thought) on making an
IA-64 port of FreeBSD? It seems Intel is trying to push IA-64
to be 'the platform' for servers and
Would the person or person(s) interested in developing a kerneld-like, dynamic
module (un)loader for FreeBSD please email me. I am really interested in this.
It would be very advantageous to begin to move kld module use into the
mainstream for all components. I'd like to do what I can to help
* Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000604 10:51] wrote:
Would the person or person(s) interested in developing a kerneld-like, dynamic
module (un)loader for FreeBSD please email me. I am really interested in this.
It would be very advantageous to begin to move kld module use into the
In muc.lists.freebsd.hackers, you wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:12:22AM -0400, Will Andrews wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 01:18:39AM +0800, Belldandy wrote:
Is there any effort(or at least, any thought) on making an
IA-64 port of FreeBSD? It seems Intel is trying to push IA-64
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 07:43:23PM +0300, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
Do you mean just "you" or "anyone with -current"? I thought our binutils
(e.g. gas) had no IA-64 support. Has that changed?
I mean you, Anatoly. I really don't have any clue how developed the
IA-64 support is; I'm just assuming
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:36:47PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
You revert to the original by applying the reverse patch of your changes
and committing that. This can be easily done with cvs. And then you
Are you joking? CVS branches will be damaged by this again.
changes in the past
Well, they did away with kerneld, but not the concept. Most of the
distributions have moved onto a more sophisticated utility that does the
job.
Alfred Perlstein had the audacity to say:
I thought Linux did away with thier kerneld concept. Afaik we can
currently load a kld from within kernel
Well, they are already moving in that direction with the newbus driver
interface. It really simplifies converting your driver to a kld if
you write it properly. Now a perfect addition would be a daemon or
something that takes care of loading/unloading all of them so that the
user doesn't have to
On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 07:10:56PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
However you do it, please fix this ASAP, and be it by reverting the
Ask Peter to commit this patch at least...
--- include/curses.h.in.bak Wed May 24 14:44:45 2000
+++ include/curses.h.in Mon Jun 5 02:28:33 2000
@@ -1313,8
Arun Sharma wrote:
I don't know if the gas support is public, but you can certainly get the
Intel assembler for IA-64, which has been open sourced under the BSD
license from developer.intel.com. It may not be of much practical use,
but might help in understanding the architecture (which
I believe HP provides a IA64 emultor which runs on Linux/Windows? I recall
stumbling into when looking at the IA64 compiler that SGI recently
releases.
It was mentioned on SGI's pages, but I couldn't find it anywhere on HP's
site (the link didn't work). If you have a pointer to this,
I would like to use tcp_wrappers (libwrap) in a program. I din't see
any examples or a reference to a web site. I have read the man page.
Is there a good example of a program in the FreeBSD 4 tree that is not
inetd spawned and uses libwrap?
Thanks,
Jim
--
Unix is very user-friendly. It's
I believe HP provides a IA64 emultor which runs on Linux/Windows? I recall
stumbling into when looking at the IA64 compiler that SGI recently
releases.
It was mentioned on SGI's pages, but I couldn't find it anywhere on HP's
site (the link didn't work). If you have a pointer
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Bob K wrote:
If I understand what he's proposing correctly, he wants to develop a
system in which all of the device drivers are loaded in the same way KLD's
are.
(I'm not a programmer, so I'd be unable to help)
Uhm. 90% of the klds _are_ device
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 08:42:47AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Huh? I'm obviously missing something here... Why would the branches be
damaged by this?
Because they forked. It cause merge troubles on the next import into the
vendor branch forever.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Coleman Kane wrote:
Well, they are already moving in that direction with the newbus driver
interface. It really simplifies converting your driver to a kld if
you write it properly. Now a perfect addition would be a daemon or
something that takes care of loading/unloading all of them so that
David Malone wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 07:34:54PM -0400, James Housley wrote:
I would like to use tcp_wrappers (libwrap) in a program. I din't see
any examples or a reference to a web site. I have read the man page.
Is there a good example of a program in the FreeBSD 4 tree that
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 07:00:08PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Just following up on this - are there any plans to merge this work
back into the mainstream so that we can generate "localized" installation
floppies for the Japanese community in future releases? Thanks!
(Yes, I'm really
hi,
I sent this question to -questions but got no response. Perhaps someone
on -hackers can help... I'm being puzzled by how to use FIFOs properly.
I've written a small test program,
#include sys/stat.h
#include err.h
#include signal.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include unistd.h
Look through /modules...
Daniel C. Sobral had the audacity to say:
M... ethernet drivers are already auto-loaded, fs modules are
already auto-loaded... what am I missing?
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 07:34:54PM -0400, James Housley wrote:
I would like to use tcp_wrappers (libwrap) in a program. I din't see
any examples or a reference to a web site. I have read the man page.
Is there a good example of a program in the FreeBSD 4 tree that is not
inetd spawned and
On Sun, 04 Jun 2000 15:42:28 -0700, W Gerald Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arun Sharma wrote:
I don't know if the gas support is public, but you can certainly get the
Intel assembler for IA-64, which has been open sourced under the BSD
license from developer.intel.com. It may not be of
hi, there!
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, James Housley wrote:
I would like to use tcp_wrappers (libwrap) in a program. I din't see
any examples or a reference to a web site. I have read the man page.
Is there a good example of a program in the FreeBSD 4 tree that is not
inetd spawned and uses
30 matches
Mail list logo
