http://www.psi-domain.co.uk/
alot cheaper and better.
--
Jamie Heckford
Chief Network Engineer
Psi-Domain - Innovative Linux Solutions. Ask Us How.
=
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:http://www.psi-domain.co.uk/
tel:+44 (0)1737 789 246
fax:+44
Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The functions that will hash the id, accepts an id as input and returns
a string for the user dir, like:
IdString returned
0 0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0
[..]
That gives you 2^32 leaf directories plus approximately
[root@elrond conf]# ifconfig tun0 1.1.1.1 up
ifconfig: interface tun0 does not exist
[root@elrond conf]# ls -al /dev/tun0
crw--- 1 uucp dialer52, 0 Dec 12 13:30 /dev/tun0
[root@elrond conf]#
this is confusing metrying to get vtund working in ports collection.
tun device is
You need to open the "device-side" of the tunnel (/dev/tun0) before the
interface is created.
Poul-Henning
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan
Phoenix writes:
[root@elrond conf]# ifconfig tun0 1.1.1.1 up
ifconfig: interface tun0 does not exist
[root@elrond conf]# ls -al /dev/tun0
crw---
Dear Sirs,
We are very pleased to welcome you and present a new economic initiative
for producers from all European countries - both western and eastern.
FOR THE FIRST TIME - ON SUCH A LARGE SCALE - IN THE
VERY HEART OF EUROPE!
"EURO LEADER 2001"
This is an honourable title and prestigious
Well, I never did get that to work last night. Any maps outside of the
memory range on the machine (which only has 128 meg) turned up all 1s in all
bits. I dropped the issue for the moment and looked at AGP ... I'm
currently doing DMA transfers, but it's an AGP card, and I'm wondering
We've got a couple BSDI machines in our lab in addition to Micron's, HP's,
and some black boxes we build ourselves. The BSDI box is by far the most
economical (as far as buying rackmount) and perform as well as anything
else. They are also using good "standard" parts which means you can find
Hi all,
After updating to 4.2-STABLE (previous version was 4.1.1-RELEASE) I'm
having some strange problem with ppp. When I try to connect for the
first time to an ISP the following occurs:
ppp[177]: tun0: Chat: Send: ATDT22334455^M
ppp[177]: tun0: Chat: Expect(120): CONNECT
I'm currently messing around with neomail, and it seems to do everything
I need it to, but it doesn't read the mail spools properly. It needs to
establish a write lock on /var/mail/someuser. I currently have the
script set to run suid/sgid 'mail', but all the spools are set to
user:logingroup for
I've got a strange problem on two of my FreeBSD machines (4.1R and
4.2-STABLE 20001207).
Whenever I try to su to root it (su) just hangs and does not execute
the login. Also when supplying the wrong password after emitting the
message it will just hang and I have to kill it with ^C.
Su'ing to
[ freebsd-stable removed from cc: list just cuz ]
: sysctl -w vm.debug_pageout_stats=1
: This output would be invaluable to me coming from people who still have
: major performance problems on heavily loaded machines.
:
:Okay, I'm gathering data as we speak, but, would you
Considering the following C code:
#include fcntl.h
int main() {
open("file", O_RDONLY);
return 0;
}
compiled with gcc -S -O2, the following
assembly code is generated:
main:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp,%ebp
subl $8,%esp
addl $-8,%esp
pushl $0
pushl
* Marc Tardif [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001213 13:30] wrote:
Considering the following C code:
#include fcntl.h
int main() {
open("file", O_RDONLY);
return 0;
}
compiled with gcc -S -O2, the following
assembly code is generated:
main:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp,%ebp
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Marc Tardif [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001213 13:30] wrote:
[ snip ]
subl $8,%esp
addl $-8,%esp
pushl $0
pushl $.LC0
call open
FreeBSD passes syscall args on the stack, Linux uses registers.
So why is
David, can you look at this?
#include fcntl.h
int foo() {
open("file", O_RDONLY);
return 0;
}
int main() {
int x;
x = foo();
return 0;
}
results in:
foo:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp,%ebp
subl $8,%esp
addl $-8,%esp
pushl $0
pushl $.LC0
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
David, can you look at this?
#include fcntl.h
int foo() {
open("file", O_RDONLY);
return 0;
}
int main() {
int x;
x = foo();
return 0;
}
results in:
foo:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp,%ebp
subl $8,%esp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marc Tardif
writes:
: So why is %esp displaced by 16 bytes when only 8 bytes
: are necessary (4 for $0 and 4 for $.LC0)? And couldn't
: the compiler use a single instruction such as
: subl $16,%esp or addl $-16,%esp? Are two instructions
: used for pipelining
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Iain Templeton wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
subl $8,%esp
addl $-8,%esp
pushl $0
pushl $.LC0
call open
why the subl then addl?
Well, as a thoroughly rough guess, the subl is probably to create
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marc Tar
dif writes:
: So why is %esp displaced by 16 bytes when only 8 bytes
: are necessary (4 for $0 and 4 for $.LC0)? And couldn't
: the compiler use a single instruction such as
: subl $16,%esp or addl
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], intmktg@
CAM.ORG writes:
Perhaps, but no matter the degree of optimisation, the
16 byte of space is performed in two instructions. This
leads me to believe is it most likely a pipelining issue
for the following pushl instructions. As for subl'ing and
addl'ing 8 bytes
:
:gcc tries to align stack to 16 byte boundaries as a speed
:optiminzation. Why it doesn't do this in one instruction is beyond
:me.
:
:Kocking 16 bytes off the stack pointer won't put it any closer to a
:16 byte boundary.
This is precisely my problem with gcc's 'optimization'. It's
Mike Tancsa wrote:
Yeah, I had a similar problem to this in the past where syslogd was kind of
hung, and the su was blocking waiting for I guess syslog to return. If you
can login as root on the console, kill syslogd, restart it and see if su
works once again.
Nope, it does not work
drew writes:
My best guess (if it isn't a bug) would be that it's there to keep the stack
on a 32 byte (IIRC, this sounds like cache line size for the newer
Intel chips)
This discussion piqued my curiosity, so I popped up the Pentium III
optomization manual. To quote it:
On Pentium II
#include fcntl.h
int foo() {
open("file", O_RDONLY);
return 0;
}
int main() {
int x;
x = foo();
return 0;
}
results in:
foo:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp,%ebp
subl $8,%esp
addl $-8,%esp
pushl $0
pushl
Hi all,
Is there any work in progress to support running FreeBSD on ARM
processors? If not, are there any plans to? I would be very interested
in helping out with such an effort. I would love to have FreeBSD running
on my iPAQ PocketPC. :)
I know that linux is already running well on ARM but I
There was somone looking at the NetBSD code with hungry eyes but I
never heard anything more... check the archives.
Pedro.
Devin Butterfield wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any work in progress to support running FreeBSD on ARM
processors? If not, are there any plans to? I would be very
Mike Tancsa wrote:
Yeah, I had a similar problem to this in the past where syslogd was kind of
hung, and the su was blocking waiting for I guess syslog to return. If you
can login as root on the console, kill syslogd, restart it and see if su
works once again.
Nope, it does not
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tony Finch writes:
: Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: If you only have half a million users, pick a prime number K close to
: the square root of the expected number of users (724 in your case -
: closest primes are 719 and 727), create that many
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Pedro F. Giffuni" writes:
: There was somone looking at the NetBSD code with hungry eyes but I
: never heard anything more... check the archives.
Last I heard, only the MIPS based PDAs were supported by
NetBSD/hpcmips. I know that there are some efforts to make
Hi,
The only thing that comes to mind here is that perhaps you've got
something like hylafax or mgetty running against the same port and
something's gone wrong with the port locking code.
It *looks* like something's writing fax commands to your modem at the
same time as you're trying to
"Louis A. Mamakos" wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
Yeah, I had a similar problem to this in the past where syslogd was kind of
hung, and the su was blocking waiting for I guess syslog to return. If you
can login as root on the console, kill syslogd, restart it and see if su
works
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tony Finch writes:
: Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: If you only have half a million users, pick a prime number K close to
: the square root of the expected number of users (724 in your case -
: closest primes are
David O'Brien wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Can you explain why fixinc needs to do this change of stdlib.h?
Also why GCC needs to install its own version of assert.h?
What is wrong with the base one?
Obviously, nothing is really wrong with any of these files.
The real question is, "Why is fixincl
Is there any work in progress to support running FreeBSD on ARM
processors? If not, are there any plans to? I would be very interested
in helping out with such an effort. I would love to have FreeBSD running
on my iPAQ PocketPC. :)
No work in progress, no plans. Would you be interested in
Jordan Hubbard wrote:
Is there any work in progress to support running FreeBSD on ARM
processors? If not, are there any plans to? I would be very interested
in helping out with such an effort. I would love to have FreeBSD running
on my iPAQ PocketPC. :)
No work in progress, no plans.
I have made a patchset available for both -current and -stable on my site:
http://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/
sysctl -w vm.debug_pageout_stats=1
The debugging code prints a line to dmesg and /var/log/messages each
time the pageout daemon runs a scan, and tells
:
: I have made a patchset available for both -current and -stable on my site:
: http://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/
: sysctl -w vm.debug_pageout_stats=1
: The debugging code prints a line to dmesg and /var/log/messages each
: time the pageout daemon runs a scan,
37 matches
Mail list logo
