Re: Trouble with HPT366

2001-04-30 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Torbjorn Kristoffersen wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Torbjorn Kristoffersen wrote: I'm having trouble with my HighPoint 366 controller. Both the chip and cable works fine in Linux or Windows, but I get an error message from FreeBSD

Re: Trouble with HPT366

2001-04-30 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Søren Schmidt wrote: It seems Torbjorn Kristoffersen wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Torbjorn Kristoffersen wrote: I'm having trouble with my HighPoint 366 controller. Both the chip and cable works fine in Linux or

Re: Trouble with HPT366

2001-04-30 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:08:47AM +0200, Torbjorn Kristoffersen wrote: Yes, I'm using the 80-conductor cable I got with the motherboard (ABIT BE6 with HPT366 onboard). Is the cable connected properly? The blue connector must be on the motherboard end.. Are you sure Leenuchs is using ATA66

Re: Trouble with HPT366

2001-04-30 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Alex Zepeda wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:08:47AM +0200, Torbjorn Kristoffersen wrote: Yes, I'm using the 80-conductor cable I got with the motherboard (ABIT BE6 with HPT366 onboard). Is the cable connected properly? The blue connector must be on the motherboard end..

Re: LCD driver port (Linux - FreeBSD) needed for car-mp3 player

2001-04-30 Thread Shaun Dwyer
Hi Mike, The software I am using in Linux (cajun - cajun.sourceforge.net) requires a serial display to work. What the linux driver does is emulate the serial display, and provides a /dev/lcd. As I am not a perl coder, I cannot modify Cajun to use the app you wrote, And as I am not a C coder, I

Re: LCD driver port (Linux - FreeBSD) needed for car-mp3 player

2001-04-30 Thread Devin Butterfield
On Sunday 29 April 2001 11:51, Shaun Dwyer wrote: Hi Mike, The software I am using in Linux (cajun - cajun.sourceforge.net) requires a serial display to work. What the linux driver does is emulate the serial display, and provides a /dev/lcd. As I am not a perl coder, I cannot modify

Re: LCD driver port (Linux - FreeBSD) needed for car-mp3 player

2001-04-30 Thread Mike Smith
The software I am using in Linux (cajun - cajun.sourceforge.net) requires a serial display to work. What the linux driver does is emulate the serial display, and provides a /dev/lcd. As I am not a perl coder, I cannot modify Cajun to use the app you wrote, And as I am not a C coder, I

Re: LCD driver port (Linux - FreeBSD) needed for car-mp3 player

2001-04-30 Thread Jamie Heckford
Hello, Been following this thread, and thought I would poke my nose in. We are in the process of writing a driver (heavily based on LCDProc - http://lcdproc.omnipotent.net) and the source for this seems to be pretty easy to work with. The panel and driver board we are using hooks into a

write() vs aio_write()

2001-04-30 Thread ªL­^¶W
Dear all: Because write() use buffer cache, I want to know whether aio_write() is better than write() in FreeBSD 4.1 . Is aio_write() outperform write() ? Or any related performance comparison between the two system call Thanks in advance Richard_Lin To Unsubscribe: send

Re: write() vs aio_write()

2001-04-30 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* ªL­^¶W [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010430 06:17] wrote: Dear all: Because write() use buffer cache, I want to know whether aio_write() is better than write() in FreeBSD 4.1 . Is aio_write() outperform write() ? Or any related performance comparison between the two system call

RE: write() vs aio_write()

2001-04-30 Thread ªL­^¶W
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alfred Perlstein Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 9:31 PM To: ªL­^¶W Cc: Freebsd-Hackers Subject: Re: write() vs aio_write() * ªL­^¶W [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010430 06:17] wrote: Dear all: Because write()

Re: write() vs aio_write()

2001-04-30 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* ªL­^¶W [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010430 06:47] wrote: * ªL­^¶W [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010430 06:17] wrote: Dear all: Because write() use buffer cache, I want to know whether aio_write() is better than write() in FreeBSD 4.1 . Is aio_write() outperform write() ? Or any related

ipfw routing/netmask problem

2001-04-30 Thread John Wilson
I'm trying to set up a FreeBSD firewall for ~100 PCs and ~10 servers, and I'm having some trouble with routing/netmasks. I have 30 IP addresses assigned to me by my ISP, for the sake of this example let's say I've got 90.91.92.0/27. The FreeBSD box has 2 interface cards, fxp0 and fxp1, fxp0

Re: ipfw routing/netmask problem

2001-04-30 Thread Nick Rogness
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, John Wilson wrote: This probably belongs on freebsd-net or freebsd-questions. I have 30 IP addresses assigned to me by my ISP, for the sake of this example let's say I've got 90.91.92.0/27. The FreeBSD box has 2 interface cards, fxp0 and fxp1, fxp0 connected to the

Re: ipfw routing/netmask problem

2001-04-30 Thread sthaug
Unfortunately, when I choose a netmask such as 255.255.255.227 (11100011), I'm left with only 6 IPs for the DMZ: Netmasks must be contiguous, which means that 255.255.255.227 is an invalid netmask. (This is a CIDR requirement.) Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

Re: Trouble with HPT366

2001-04-30 Thread Torbjorn Kristoffersen
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Alex Zepeda wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:08:47AM +0200, Torbjorn Kristoffersen wrote: Yes, I'm using the 80-conductor cable I got with the motherboard (ABIT BE6 with HPT366 onboard). Is the cable connected properly? The blue connector must be on the

Re: Is it ok to compile a device driver as a module though no load_function is declared in DRIVER_MODULE()?

2001-04-30 Thread Nicolas Souchu
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 03:42:34PM +0200, Alex wrote: Hi, i've got a little question about device drivers for FreeBSD. I'm testing my device driver by compiling it as a module and kldloading it. But as I don't want to use it as a module in the future I declared DRIVER_MODULE(..) as

Re: ipfw routing/netmask problem

2001-04-30 Thread John Wilson
Dear Nick, Thanks for your prompt reply. On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, John Wilson wrote: I have 30 IP addresses assigned to me by my ISP, for the sake of this example let's say I've got 90.91.92.0/27. The FreeBSD box has 2 interface cards, fxp0 and fxp1, fxp0 connected to the router,

RE: write() vs aio_write()

2001-04-30 Thread Charles Randall
Regarding aio_*, Alfred Perlstein writes: It's a good idea to use it for disk IO, probably not a good idea for network IO. Could you elaborate? -Charles To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

Re: ipfw routing/netmask problem

2001-04-30 Thread Nick Rogness
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, John Wilson wrote: Moved to -net. Nick Rogness [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Keep on Routing in a Free World... FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

RE: write() vs aio_write()

2001-04-30 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Charles Randall wrote: Regarding aio_*, Alfred Perlstein writes: It's a good idea to use it for disk IO, probably not a good idea for network IO. Could you elaborate? -Charles Sockets already support non-blocking IO, and have for a long while. Hence, the socket code

Set up loader to boot cd

2001-04-30 Thread Rick Duvall
I am trying to make a custom boot CD for FreeBSD. I got it to the point to where the CD will boot, load the kernel, but that's as far as it get's. It does when it get's to the part where it wants to mount the root devicd. It tried to access the floppy drive. So, do I need to vnconfig the

Patch to lock LDT and TSS's

2001-04-30 Thread John Baldwin
I've got a little patch to try to make accesses to the LDT and TSS of processes on the x86 thread safe. It relies partially on the fact that a TSS or LDT is only modified by the process it is attached to (with the exception of the LDT reference count for LDT's shared among processes). The patch

Re: write() vs aio_write()

2001-04-30 Thread Jan Mikkelsen
Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ On using aio on disks vs. sockets ] Sockets already support non-blocking IO, and have for a long while. Hence, the socket code is probably more optimized for non-blocking operation than AIO operation. As a plus, using non-blocking socket operations will

Re: write() vs aio_write()

2001-04-30 Thread 'Alfred Perlstein'
* Charles Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010430 10:26] wrote: Regarding aio_*, Alfred Perlstein writes: It's a good idea to use it for disk IO, probably not a good idea for network IO. Could you elaborate? Sure. Network IO can be done without blocking (unless you take a fault on the source

Problem with device rl

2001-04-30 Thread milunovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Maybe this isn't right mailing list to send this problem but here it is: I have D-Link DFE-530TX+ and in LINT I read that I should use device rl for this Network card but kernel don't want to find it only output off kernel is : pci0: unknown card

Re: Problem with device rl

2001-04-30 Thread Andrew Matheson
Vojislav, I had the same problem with FreeBSD 4.3 and a D-Link DFE-530TX+ on a Dell PowerEdge 1400sc. I spent a couple of days on and off fighting with it and couldn't make it work. After going as far as explicitly loading the rl driver in loader.conf (I don't know how I ended up in there,

Re: Problem with device rl

2001-04-30 Thread Matthew Emmerton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Maybe this isn't right mailing list to send this problem but here it is: I have D-Link DFE-530TX+ and in LINT I read that I should use device rl for this Network card but kernel don't want to find it only output off kernel is : pci0: unknown card

Re: write() vs aio_write()

2001-04-30 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ On using aio on disks vs. sockets ] Sockets already support non-blocking IO, and have for a long while. Hence, the socket code is probably more optimized for non-blocking operation than AIO operation. As a