On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
to handle more then 250 requests/sec. With the connection load you
want to handle, the chance of the data being cacheable in ram is
fairly low. So a disk-based caching proxy will drop connection
performance by two orders of
:
:On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
:
: to handle more then 250 requests/sec. With the connection load you
: want to handle, the chance of the data being cacheable in ram is
: fairly low. So a disk-based caching proxy will drop connection
: performance by two orders of
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
This is fairly easy to do. You can use SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF
socket opts to adjust the tcp buffer space. You can make the default
small and receive-centric and when you think you've got a good
connection you can pump it up.
I
Ashutosh S. Rajekar wrote:
For the diskless case I don't know if you can make
it to a million simultanious connections, but Terry
has gotten his boxes to do a hundred thousand so we
know that at least is doable. But rather then spend a
Hmmm. I wonder how much TCP/IP
I guess we beat you to the punch...
We have a product which is now shipping, and which currently
supports 1,000,000 concurrent connections.
I guess quite a lot of people are at it right now, the prime one is
NetScaler. If I'm not wrong, they brag about a million connections or so,
on a
Guenter,
This code flips one bit in the eflags register, checking for the
presense of the cpuid instruction. I'm not sure at all why this would
have any side effects on any processor/OS combination - theorically
there should be none... However H}kan had (if I remember right)
already reported a
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the BSD license for ya.
There needs to be a license that says something to the
effect of Anyone
can use/buy/sell/modify/distribute this software with or
without source code except Microsoft.
Why? I'd personally be happy if Microsoft
Ashutosh S. Rajekar wrote:
I guess we beat you to the punch...
We have a product which is now shipping, and which currently
supports 1,000,000 concurrent connections.
I guess quite a lot of people are at it right now, the prime
one is NetScaler. If I'm not wrong, they brag about a
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
Their 3200 only has 1G of RAM; you could _barely_ fit the
TCP state for 1,000,000 connections into just 1G of RAM,
and have a tiny amount left over for buffers, drivers,
the rest of your kernel, etc.. I can't believe that their
3100 (only 512M of
After reading Michael's post at:
http://daily.daemonnews.org/view_story.php3?story_id=2112
and exchanging a few emails with him, I've became convinced it might be
reasonable to try to write an article and submit it to sys admin magazine,
in re: tuning a freebsd box properly.
The goal would be to
Wed Jun 20 2001, Michel LESPINASSE wrote:
Guenter,
This code flips one bit in the eflags register, checking for the
presense of the cpuid instruction. I'm not sure at all why this would
have any side effects on any processor/OS combination - theorically
there should be none... However
:
:On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
:
: This is fairly easy to do. You can use SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF
: socket opts to adjust the tcp buffer space. You can make the default
: small and receive-centric and when you think you've got a good
: connection you can pump it up.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:04:22AM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
A web proxy could be
round-robined fairly easily, but for a mail relay it is often a good
idea to split the incoming and outgoing mail into two separate round
robins (two separate groups of machines).
Why's that?
Hey, I am using proftpd 1.2.1, after a complete CVSup to 3.5-STABLE (this
is a production machine, going to 4 would cause way too many
headaches). Anyway, I get this classic error in my logs:
Jun 20 14:24:02 prime proftpd[36049]: no modules loaded for `ftp' service
Jun 20 14:24:02 prime
I've heard that PAM in 3.x is mostly broken, but this is what I use for
ProFTPd in 4.3-RELEASE, and it works fine:
ftp authrequiredpam_unix.so try_first_pass
ftp account requiredpam_unix.so try_first_pass
ftp session requiredpam_permit.so
Joe Clarke
On Wed, 20
Jordan Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
From: Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:16:20 +0200
It all sounds really odd to me but alas a cat does stupid things when it
gets cornered...
I
* Dave McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010620 15:26] wrote:
Jordan Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
From: Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:16:20 +0200
It all sounds really odd to me but alas a
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6322264.html?tag=tp_pr
Gates talks about GPL and being against it. ---Quote:
In an interview Tuesday with CNET News.com at the TechEd 2001 conference,
Gates observed that Microsoft routinely shares the source code for its Windows
operating system with its
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
I don't think this represents the biggest problem you would face,
though. It is far more likely that hung or slow connections
(e.g. the originator goes away without disconnecting the socket
or the originator is on a slow link) will
Peter wrote:
However, Gates said, there are problems for commercial users relative to the
(GNU General Public License), and we are just making sure people understand the
GPL.
end Quote.
But the issue is that wasn't the end of the quotation. Later on, Bubba says,
And so people
Terry Lambert wrote:
Ashutosh S. Rajekar wrote:
I guess we beat you to the punch...
We have a product which is now shipping, and which currently
supports 1,000,000 concurrent connections.
I guess quite a lot of people are at it right now, the prime
one is NetScaler. If I'm
Ashutosh S. Rajekar wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
Their 3200 only has 1G of RAM; you could _barely_ fit the
TCP state for 1,000,000 connections into just 1G of RAM,
and have a tiny amount left over for buffers, drivers,
the rest of your kernel, etc.. I can't
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GPL is great for simple things, that don't create any standard, but
work upon one. But as even RMS [I think it was RMS] agreed, BSD
license is much better for 'standards'. -- ie the oog format was BSD
licensed and the GPL people endorsed it because this would
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:32:24PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I think that we're closer to agreement here than it may appear. Last I
heard from obrien he was overloaded, and wasn't looking to head this up
himself unless no one else was going to do it.
At this point I view myself as more
FRESH AIR TODAY WEB DESIGN
JIM WEAVER KIM NICE
3071 HWY 101 NORTH
GEARHART, OR 97138
1-503-738-0657
1-877-230-7268
Hello,
We are writing to you today to see if you are interested in owning an
affordable web site that you can customize and make changes yourself at any
time without hiring a
I don't know about anyone else, but it made my day.
At 12:27 AM 6/21/01 -0400:
FRESH AIR TODAY WEB DESIGN
JIM WEAVER KIM NICE
3071 HWY 101 NORTH
GEARHART, OR 97138
1-503-738-0657
1-877-230-7268
Is anyone close enough to drive round and have a quiet word? Netiquette
for instance. Or asking for
Gearhart? Umm.. that's about 2 hours from Portland... Maybe DaveG can drive
down from his hidey hole in Clackamas County...
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, David Preece wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but it made my day.
At 12:27 AM 6/21/01 -0400:
FRESH AIR TODAY WEB DESIGN
JIM WEAVER KIM
void wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:04:22AM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
A web proxy could be
round-robined fairly easily, but for a mail relay it
is often a good idea to split the incoming and outgoing
mail into two separate round robins (two separate groups
of
Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
I don't think this represents the biggest problem
you would face, though. It is far more likely that
hung or slow connections (e.g. the originator goes
away without disconnecting the socket or the
29 matches
Mail list logo
