In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeff Mohler writes:
: I need to upgrade to a new HD now that the current one
: has shows some reliability issues..and Im polling for
: what is the best method to do so.
buy new disk.
install disk
disklabel da1
newfs filesystems.
mount fs under /da1
for each partion
In message Pine.BSF.4.21.0107071842230.58871-10@beppo Matthew Jacob writes:
: tar cfl - . | (cd /altroot/local_fs tar xpf -)
Don't use tar. It loses devices, can't handle holey files well and a
number of other minor clitches. Use dump instead.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Only if you want to be here until next tuesday. Solaris ufsdump runs 8 times
as fast.
You're right - tar doesn't handle files with holes. Not too many of those
around.
/dev you can and should always remake. Typically it's only sa0 out of the
generic set that tar skips.
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001,
I mean, Warner- you're right, but, well, I've been using tar to copy systems
for the last 5 years for *BSD, and, well, it really works best for me.
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Matthew Jacob wrote:
Only if you want to be here until next tuesday. Solaris ufsdump runs 8 times
as fast.
You're
I am interested in writing man pages for some kernel
functions related to some work that I am doing. As
I am not familiar with a lot of the code that I am
going through I am looking for someone who would be
willing to validate what I write before (or after) I
send it (is send-pr the best way to
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 20:27:16 -0700
From: Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
such. It's often the case that actually tracking the effectiveness
of, say, $500 towards some theoretically worthy cause costs you
thousands of dollars in man-hours. Heck, If somebody tried to donate
a million
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 08:33:04AM +, E.B. Dreger wrote:
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 20:27:16 -0700
From: Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
such. It's often the case that actually tracking the effectiveness
of, say, $500 towards some theoretically worthy cause costs you
thousands of
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 12:35:06AM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
Richard Hodges wrote:
Sure, no argument there. Taking Wes' suggestion, maybe there is an
opportunity in the official distribution distinction. How about a
certificate of authenticity which costs the vendors $1 or $2
Sergey Babkin wrote:
Peter Wemm wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sergey Babkin writes:
If the FreeBSD Foundation is an existing entity now, maybe we
can just change the license for the CD images to not for resale
unless the distributor signs an
Hello everybody!
This is relative to 4.3 for yet ;) so if you're using something older
you can skip it easily.
well, I came up with a patch
(http://www.morning.ru/~poige/patchzone/ip_fw.c.patch)
How it was started
--
For a long time I've been looking forward (and
Wes Peters([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.07 21:57:35 +:
Richard Hodges wrote:
Sure, no argument there. Taking Wes' suggestion, maybe there is an
opportunity in the official distribution distinction. How about a
certificate of authenticity which costs the vendors $1 or $2 (or
I have some questions about the dbopen(3) man page.
1. It seems to me that the list of includes should include something
like
#include fcntl.h
otherwise the various flags for open(2) are not defined (like O_RDWR,
etc), and these are needed for dbopen.
2. If I do something like this:
Hi folks,
Just noticed 2 interesting things while reading ip/icmp datagrams off
the IPPROTO_RAW socket (i.g.):
int on =1;
sock = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_ICMP);
setsockopt(sock, IPPROTO_IP, IP_HDRINCL, (char *)on, sizeof(on)) 0);
/* works without sockopt too! */
...
In a message dated 7/6/01 4:00:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Nothing BSDi ever did made any sense, so why does this suprise you? The
fact
that BSDi didnt nothing positive for FreeBSD doesnt surprise me at all.
Luckily, with this post to the mailing list
In a message dated 7/7/01 6:52:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
But as far as added-value goes, why wouldn't minimum cost be an
added value to a potential customer? I think that the companies
like Cheapbytes serve a social purpose in this regard.
If theres one
In message Pine.BSF.4.21.0107080040010.61247-10@beppo Matthew Jacob writes:
: Only if you want to be here until next tuesday. Solaris ufsdump runs 8 times
: as fast.
Yes. Mostly because it uses async io and a couple other tricks
(Dworkin Muller did a lot of work on ufsdump on solaris to
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 12:29:40 EDT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If theres one thing that non-unix people have learned about unix
is that the cost of the product is insignificant compared to
the value of time in getting it to function. Its already free to
anyone who knows what they are doing. A
Hello,
Someone could tell me how create a bootable FreeBSD CD ?
I cannot use a floppy image because it is too small to put my kernel (1.5
Mo), and I cant create a 2.88 Mb floppy image (as I don't have the drive).
Then how create a freebsd boot image which use the real CD space to put all
files
Sorry, not knowing what the @#$! one is doing does not translate
into the OS having a high time until usefulness. IMHO, FreeBSD's
TUU and TCO are _so_ much lower than Linux or NT... that's one of
the non-technical reasons that I love it so.
Whats the saying, knowledge without understanding
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wes Peters) wrote:
If so - where will the funeral be held and will there be Jordan soup
for sharing and grokking (although I'd prefer some other people to
donate some food)?
Soup? Jordan? Never. A nice thick stew with beer broth, yes.
Could we
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jordan Hubbard) wrote:
You disagree with me that Walnut Creek CDROM is gone?
I would... Three days ago they (Walnut Creek CDROM) charged my credit card
with USD 34.95. That's quite a greedy corpse, wouldn't you say? 8-)
Take that mail as a rather bad
Hackers, CC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wind River might be cautious slow when considering donating the
FreeBSD trademark to a FreeBSD Foundation controlled by a board of
just 3 directors, that even FreeBSD people are just getting to know
of, have yet to evaluate as `The Foundation'.
Wind River might
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Somers writes:
I'm not having a go at Cheapbytes. I'm just saying that their CDs
should be labeled official or unofficial based on their content. If
they want to drop the base ISO image onto a CD and sell it, then
they're as official as anybody else.
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Somers writes:
|
| I'm not having a go at Cheapbytes. I'm just saying that their CDs
| should be labeled official or unofficial based on their content. If
| they want to drop the base ISO image onto a CD and sell it, then
|
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Somers writes:
|
| I'm not having a go at Cheapbytes. I'm just saying that their CDs
| should be labeled official or unofficial based on their content. If
| they want to drop the base ISO image onto a CD and sell it, then
Hello,
I'm writing an article on kernel panics -- specifically, how to
prepare for one, how to deal with one, and a cookbook on what to do to
give an admin the best possible chance of getting help with the issue.
Unfortunately, I haven't built a panicing kernel in years. Is there
any way to
Michael Lucas wrote:
Unfortunately, I haven't built a panicing kernel in years. Is there
any way to force a system to panic in such a way as to save a core?
I'm sure someone out there has a little program that creates a panic. :)
Build a kernel with DDB, press Ctrl-Alt-Esc, type panic.
Thanks! This was exactly what I'm looking for!
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:37:04AM +0100, Ben Smithurst wrote:
Michael Lucas wrote:
Unfortunately, I haven't built a panicing kernel in years. Is there
any way to force a system to panic in such a way as to save a core?
I'm sure someone
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 06:59:14AM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
Perhaps this labelling can be in the form of information on the
FreeBSD.ORG web site that lists distributions that merit the
official label.
so this list would be controlled by those who can make changes
to the FreeBSD web site,
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 12:29:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luckily, with this post to the mailing list you can join the ranks of doing
nothing positive for the project. Congrats!
I seriously doubt if I am the only one who is beyond disappointed in BSDI's
contribution to
** Original Subject: Re: FreeBSD Mall now BSDCentral
** Original Sender: Bill Fumerola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Original Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 20:45:58 -0400
** Original Message follows...
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 06:59:14AM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
Perhaps this labelling can be in the
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
In message Pine.BSF.4.21.0107071842230.58871-10@beppo Matthew Jacob writes:
: tar cfl - . | (cd /altroot/local_fs tar xpf -)
Don't use tar. It loses devices, can't handle holey files well and a
number of other minor clitches. Use dump instead.
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:04:31PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Perhaps this labelling can be in the form of information on the
FreeBSD.ORG web site that lists distributions that merit the
official label.
That seems to make a lot of sense. In this context,
Bill Fumerola wrote:
| On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 06:59:14AM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
|
| Perhaps this labelling can be in the form of information on the
| FreeBSD.ORG web site that lists distributions that merit the
| official label.
|
| so this list would be controlled by those who can make
From: Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re. The Foundation [was Re: FreeBSD Mall now BSDCentral]
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 15:53:40 +0200
As I recall FreeBSD Inc (ie jkh dg, a team of 2) once held the
trademark, then it moved to Walnut, then BSDi, then Wind River.
Just
hi all,,
how can I tell sendmail to deny this
MAIL From: SIZE=1926
250 ... Sender ok
cheers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Noses wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wes Peters) wrote:
If so - where will the funeral be held and will there be Jordan soup
for sharing and grokking (although I'd prefer some other people to
donate some food)?
Soup? Jordan? Never. A nice thick stew with beer
Hackers, CC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wind River might be cautious slow when considering donating the
FreeBSD trademark to a FreeBSD Foundation controlled by a board of
just 3 directors, that even FreeBSD people are just getting to know
of, have yet to evaluate as `The Foundation'.
I believe that all
38 matches
Mail list logo
