Hello.
I am reading TCP/IP Illustrated and it is making references to variables in
the BSD4.4 code. I would like to use these same variables, specifically the
variable ifnet, which was declared in BSD4.4 as a struct ifnet *ifnet,
according to TCP/IP Illustrated. The name of the variable has
subscribe freebsd-hackers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
look in /usr/include/net/if_var.h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I am reading TCP/IP Illustrated and it is making references to variables in
the BSD4.4 code. I would like to use these same variables, specifically the
variable ifnet, which was declared in BSD4.4 as a struct ifnet *ifnet,
Hello,
maybe it's a bit offtopic, but still: how can I disable reboot on kernel
panic in 15 seconds, so that it just hangs and I'm able to see what
happened when I come ?
Regards,
Eugene
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Could please somebody make this little, trivial and obviuos patch, I
requested it a while ago, or should I make a PR for it??
Hi,
()s are missing around the macro argument in cv_waitq_empty. The call
if(!(cv_waitq_empty(sc-foo_cv)))
...
will otherwise fail to compile.
fixed.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Harti Brandt writes:
Could please somebody make this little, trivial and obviuos patch, I
requested it a while ago, or should I make a PR for it??
Hi,
()s are missing around the macro argument in cv_waitq_empty. The call
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:34:52PM -0700, Dan wrote:
ya it seems it is running into swap abit.
hmmm watching apache with truss i see alot of error #35's
in the sys callswhat is that related to again?
/usr/include/errno.h says:
#define EAGAIN 35 /* Resource
Eugene L. Vorokov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
maybe it's a bit offtopic, but still: how can I disable reboot on kernel
panic in 15 seconds, so that it just hangs and I'm able to see what
happened when I come ?
Set PANIC_REBOOT_WAIT_TIME to -1.
Regards,
Eugene
To Unsubscribe:
If you look at the cache dumps and dig output below, you can clearly
see the timeout for fuji.jamcracker.com is less then the timeout
for jamcracker.com AFTER we've looked up other elements for fuji,
which means that when it timed out, that IN A record will be gone.
But
On 16-Jul-01 Dan wrote:
ya it seems it is running into swap abit.
hmmm watching apache with truss i see alot of error #35's
in the sys callswhat is that related to again?
From sys/errno.h:
/* non-blocking and interrupt i/o */
#define EAGAIN 35 /* Resource
Richard Hodges wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Bill Paul wrote:
They're okay. The NatSemi chip has one flaw, which is that RX buffers
must be aligned on a 64-bit boundary. None of the more expensive NICs have
this restriction.
Go ahead and beat me up if you have to :-) But why is there
Bill Paul wrote:
Now, before any of you armchair geniuses out there start chiming in
with your incredibly brilliant solutions for this problem which you
just made up on the spot, forget it. This issue has been discussed
to death and there's just no easy way around it.
Terry Lambert and
Here´s an explanation from today´s BIND-users traffic:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Path: not-for-mail
From: Barry Margolin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject: Re: Am I wrong?
References: 9j1i3n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Genuity, Cambridge, MA
Higher-level servers
Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
There are only two shared libaries in common (libc and libm) and
both are the same on FreeBSD (in /compat/linux) and Linux.
So any ideas on where the program is going wrong?
man fpsetround
That won't change a thing. Both systems round to nearest.
Look at
Actually, since the 486, it's been possible for us to turn on unaligned
access exceptions on the x86. We should probably consider doing this, to
ensure better performance, and to avoid the unnecessary bus overhead we
eat for unaligned access today... not to mention how it could shake out
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
Richard Hodges wrote:
Go ahead and beat me up if you have to :-) But why is there _any_ issue
with RX buffer alignment? I get some mbufs and set the data pointer to
any point I want, or I get a cluster, which is always on a 2k boundary.
: On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:45:29 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
One obvious reason that the Linux approach is wrong is
that it ends up requiring the save and restore of FP
registers on context switches, which is overhead they
ate anyway, by doing TSS based context switching. The
amount of state with
Terry Lambert writes:
Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
The defaults for the Linux emulator are different than
the defaults for Linux. Linux sets some stuff up wrong,
FreeBSD sets stuff up wrong. This is a choice between bad
and worse, since the CPU does not support what you want.
FreeBSD
Can anyone tell me why FreeBSD has 256 bytes of spare space in the user
area? Thanks.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Matt Dillon([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.13 15:27:08 +:
Also, do performance testing with dynamic-linked verses static-linked
binaries. Static-linked binaries may look larger, but they have a
much lower dirty-page overhead then the dynamically linked equivalent.
It depends
Dear fellow hackers
I haven't received any CTMs since July 12th. Am I the only one ?
My guess is that the main distribution point is malfunctioning.
Can anybody with closer access to the 'feeder' check into it ?
Thanks !
Ciao, dewrweil,
--
Carlo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Does anyone have a reference to the values of type field in the Intel
BIOS physical system RAM mapping?
I am curious why we are using only entries of type 0x01.
--mark tinguely.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On 17-Jul-01 Matthew Jacob wrote:
Actually, since the 486, it's been possible for us to turn on unaligned
access exceptions on the x86. We should probably consider doing this, to
ensure better performance, and to avoid the unnecessary bus overhead we
eat for unaligned access today...
Julian Elischer wrote:
The proble is that teh ethernet header is 14 bytes so you must choose
to allighn either the whole packet, or the IP header, but you cannot do
both.
Hm, it seems to be a waste of CPU time memory bandwidth: only the
IP and TCP headers have to be aligned but the payload
FreeBSD Alpha.chello.no 4.3-RELEASE FreeBSD
I have a wierd problem, where the system is unable to resolve hostnames.
Even though I have configured resolv.conf, here is the output of the file:
search chello.no
nameserver 212.186.255.29
nameserver 212.186.255.30
I have checked the addresses, and
Magnus wrote:
What makes it even more wierd, is that I am able to resolv hostnames by
using
'nslookup'.
prompt # nslookup freebsd.org
server: dnscache01.chello.no
address: 212.186.255.29
Name:Freebsd.org
address: 216.136.204.21
Wich means I am able to resolve hostnames, DNS is
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 04:37:46PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
Jiangyi Liu has been working on mbuf limiting code for the past week or
so. What he has is pretty complete, I expect to get most of it committed
once Bosko gets back.
Well, I'm back. I'm now going to bed but my INBOX
Ok, so I finally got two identical ep cards to come up at the same time
and both work. Thanks.
But when I run:
sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge=1
Nothing happens. They don't get put in promiscuous mode, and bridging does
not get turned on, even though I have bridging in my kernel.
Can
|- Message log follows: ---|
| no valid recipients were found for this message |
|--|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unknown user
/etc/rc.conf looks like this:
pccard_enable=YES
pccard_mem=DEFAULT
pccardd_flags= -i 10 -i 15
removable_interfaces=ep0 ep1
network_interfaces=lo0
(I have tried with and without that last lo0 line)
and /etc/defaults/pccard.conf looks like this:
config auto ep0 10
config auto ep1 15
so
Igor Podlesny wrote:
/*
* Macro for finding the interface (ifnet structure) corresponding to one
* of our IP addresses.
*/
#define INADDR_TO_IFP(addr, ifp) \
/* struct in_addr addr; */ \
/* struct ifnet *ifp; */ \
{ \
register struct in_ifaddr *ia;
Modified files:
gnu/lib/libdialogchecklist.c menubox.c radiolist.c
textbox.c tree.c yesno.c
Log:
Improve the interface provided by libdialog. Move a cursor around over
the components and trigger actions based on its position. This reduces
the
32 matches
Mail list logo
