On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
What is the file system that uses VT_TFS in vnode.h? Is it still available
on FreeBSD? Thanks.
This type of filesystem was used by netcon package
(http://www.netcon.com). However there is no new versions for FreeBSD
above 2.x, so it probably
Hello,
I checked out quakeforge (http://www.quakeforge.net/) from their cvs
tree, and tried building it on FreeBSD yesterday. It mostly worked,
but I ran into two odd problems.
Quakeforge uses plugins to handle sound; there is an OSS plugin for
the normal system sound libs, and an SDL plugin
As said below, modify usbdevs/umass.c to recognise your device and then
see whether it behaves. If not, try adding the quirks to scsi_da.c (no
READS_6 and no cache sync) and see whether that improves things.
If it is an ATAPI based device it might be more work to get this device
working.
Nick
Hi Hackers, et.al.
The PIM Evolution, http://www.ximian.com/products/ximian_evolution/,
does not run on FreeBSD. The authors have made a change so that it will.
However, we would like to know if FreeBSD is the odd-man-out, or if the
authors were lucky Evolution ran on Solaris and Linux.
-
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 03:11:46PM +, Kevin Way wrote:
I don't see any reason to force the boot order to be maintained. As long
as the dependancies are set correctly, i'd think the boot order would be
determined solely by the output of rcorder.
Correct.
What am I missing?
Nothing.
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 01:16:31AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Anyone else think this patch from NetBSD is worthwhile?
As JDP said, YES!.
--- /dev/null Sat Sep 1 01:13:34 2001
+++ zopen.c Sat Sep 1 01:10:14 2001
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Public domain stdio wrapper for libz, written
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 12:11:15AM -0400, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 08:33:36PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
Well, since it didn't, I might as well explain the problem here too.
There are at least two major problems with VIA chips:
[data curruption on VIA
It seems David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 12:11:15AM -0400, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 08:33:36PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
Well, since it didn't, I might as well explain the problem here too.
There are at least two major problems with VIA
Phil Kernick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has been kind enough (and brave enough)
to sit down and produce patches for the dc(4) driver to add support for
the Conexant LANfinity miniPCI fast ethernet controller. Those of you
that have laptops with this chipset can test the patches at:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new P4s are shipping with 800mhz RAMBUS memory modules. Wouldn't 2GB of
800mhz RAM go a long way to evening out the performance between a PC/FreeBSD
box and all but the most specialized, packet-pushing ASICs?
I doubt it.
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Deepak Jain wrote:
The new P4s are shipping with 800mhz RAMBUS memory modules. Wouldn't 2GB of
800mhz RAM go a long way to evening out the performance between a PC/FreeBSD
box and all but the most specialized, packet-pushing ASICs?
I was doing some rough figuring, and
Correcting myself ...
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is very little bulk copying in the IP forwarding path of the
kernel, so the higher bandwidth of RAMBUS would not provide much
benefit. I suppose it would speed up the DMA transfers between the
On a related topic, I wonder whether gcc 3.0 will improve Athon
compilations. I have a big number crunching program that runs just as
fast on Windows2000 on my laptop(1Ghz PPro), as on my monster 1.2G
Athlon DDR with FreeBSD. Rob.
Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems David O'Brien wrote:
On
Hi!
Here is sequence leading to page fault:
1. Make special file on NFS
2. Mount FFS from this file
3. Read or write special file (for attributes to change)
4. Unmount this special
5. Enjoy ``Fatal trap 12: ...''
Like this:
su-2.04# mount
192.168.5.1:/home/diskless_root on / (nfs, noatime)
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:34:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 11:21:09PM +0100, Steve Roome wrote:
ping http://www.myserver.wherever/
instead of telnet wherever 80, just to see if I get a connected or
not ?
Do you have *ANY* clue how ping works? Ping uses
Nick,
As said below, modify usbdevs/umass.c to recognise your device and then
see whether it behaves. If not, try adding the quirks to scsi_da.c (no
READS_6 and no cache sync) and see whether that improves things.
Since I started this, I ought to say that while I enjoy new challenges I
don't
* Andrew J Caines [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010902 22:12] wrote:
Nick,
As said below, modify usbdevs/umass.c to recognise your device and then
see whether it behaves. If not, try adding the quirks to scsi_da.c (no
READS_6 and no cache sync) and see whether that improves things.
Since I
17 matches
Mail list logo
