Jesús Arnáiz wrote:
Hi!
I want to install a cyphred partition on my system. I use FreeBSD, and I
want to know what software is avaivle in order to do it.
I heard about CFS and TCFS (but this is not still supported by FreeBSD), is
there any better bet? If anyone know any good resource
Take charge of your career by utilizing www.marblejar.com. We offer IT
professionals like you all of the services you require to find the most
challenging positions in the IT industry. * $500 Signing bonus
when you get job through us* Dedicated recruiters to help you identify the
best job
I'm trying to implement wiping of freed swap pages inside swap_pager.
I'm using 2.2-branch, here is my thoughts and steps:
I have a (starting) block number of swapped page, i know page size, and i
know that i have to use some pool of buffers inside kernel. So i get
buffer with getpbuf(), then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there!
I've stumbled accross the following in sys/netinet/ip_input.c (v.1.173)
- --- lines 470-477 ---
if (m == NULL) {/* Packet discarded by firewall */
static int __debug=10;
if (__debug 0) {
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 October 2001 16:53, Alexey V.Neyman wrote:
What is the meaning of this construct? Isn't it functionally equivalent to
Oops, sorry for the post. I haven't noticed `static' there at first glance :\
Regards,
Alexey.
- --
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 04:53:12PM +0400, Alexey V . Neyman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello there!
I've stumbled accross the following in sys/netinet/ip_input.c (v.1.173)
- --- lines 470-477 ---
if (m == NULL) {/* Packet discarded by firewall */
Broken pipe generally means that your socket connection to the server
has either been torn down or hasn't been setup at all. Check to see if
this is really the case, and also check errno (you might get EBADF or
EPIPE depending upon the circumstances).
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
Well, the question is rather simple... i am running some experiments
on system with severe load on the PCI bus (basically a router with 4 interfaces
trying to forward 2..4 streams of 64-byte packets at 100Mbit/s (i.e. 144kpps
on each stream), and from low level timing i notice that the
time to
* Luigi Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011024 14:03] wrote:
Well, the question is rather simple... i am running some experiments
on system with severe load on the PCI bus (basically a router with 4 interfaces
trying to forward 2..4 streams of 64-byte packets at 100Mbit/s (i.e. 144kpps
on each
An updated fxp driver patch for bundling receive interrupts, thus saving
a noticeable amount of CPU overhead for interrupt processing, can be
found at http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/fxp/. New features include:
- control of microcode parameters through sysctl variables
- activation/deactivation of
I am trying to get two identical 3C589 pc cards working simultaneously on my
laptop. This was accomplished with FreeBSD 4.3 by adding lines like this to
/etc/defaults/pccard.conf :
config auto ep0 10
config auto ep1 15
(everything else for that cards entry is left the same)
However, this
I am not an official FreeBSD commiter, so I can't tell really...
Therefore jlemon was in cc: (he is the fxp driver maintainer), so it is
his call.
Nevertheless, I think this patch needs a little bit more testing - there
are many 8255* chipset revisions out there, and as the code is *very*
chipset
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Marko Zec wrote:
An updated fxp driver patch for bundling receive interrupts, thus saving
a noticeable amount of CPU overhead for interrupt processing, can be
found at http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/fxp/. New features include:
I haven't reviewed the code and don't have a
Mike Silbersack wrote:
That being said, I thought I should check on one thing: In your original
post, you mentioned that these techniques came from the linux drive for
these cards. In the process of writing this patch, did you copy any
section of code from the Linux driver? If possible,
Has anyone out there tried to get C++ code running in the freebsd kernel
(like as a .ko)? I have a piece of code that I got working in userland,
and would like to port it in the kernel (I had anecdotal evidence that
it worked). The major problem is that the library, when in kernel, uses
a
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 03:28:25PM -0700, Denis Serenyi wrote:
Has anyone out there tried to get C++ code running in the freebsd kernel
(like as a .ko)? I have a piece of code that I got working in userland,
have a look at what the Click team did
http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/click/
Well, the question is rather simple... i am running some experiments
on system with severe load on the PCI bus (basically a router with 4 interfac
es
trying to forward 2..4 streams of 64-byte packets at 100Mbit/s (i.e. 144kpps
on each stream), and from low level timing i notice that the
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Marko Zec wrote:
The microcode should work on many revisions - if not all - of
Intel 8255* chipset, but the BSD driver is currently tested only
on 82558-B0, so I would really appreciate any feedback on driver
functionality/stability on other chipset revisions.
Chalk up
In article local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
I am not an official FreeBSD commiter, so I can't tell really...
Therefore jlemon was in cc: (he is the fxp driver maintainer), so it is
his call.
Nevertheless, I think this patch needs a little bit more testing - there
are many
Has anyone enumerated the hardware platforms that the spkr(4)
device works on? And for those platforms where it doesn't work,
are there suggestions for (and documentation on) alternative
interfaces?
--lyndon
What about all the people who hoarded tonnes of spam in their bunkers?
I hoard spam
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:45:11PM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
I get the feeling this - inappropriate - setting of a _program
variable is due to my misguided suggestion in PR conf/20202
which verbatimly made it into the FreeBSD start scripts. If it
doesn't fit the usual rules feel free to
[ On a related somewhat anti-GNU thread ... ]
18 months ago we had a conversation on the mailing list about g77
vs. f77 as the canonical command name for the FORTRAN compiler.
The crux of the argument was that f77 was the canonical BSD name
for the command, and that's what it has been since.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Done. I tested on my -current (compiled on Oct 22) the patch you can
find at http://labs.gr/~charon/patches/diff.04.ipf-rc-U
It is functionally equivalent to our current rc.network behavior, but
it uses the variables you proposed, and it moves all the
i have the follow problem:
i use etinc in one FreeBSD box (4.2). it works fine.
this freebsd make bridge (one interface in switch), and another cross
over to router. in the conection to router, there are one colision led,
that are almost always up! i did put one rule for bridge only ip in rl0
24 matches
Mail list logo
