will th gx driver be MFC'ed any time soon? I have a box and a card
sitting around, and was wondering ...
thanks,
danny
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
hi,
I need to set up a packet tunnel for
two win boxes connected to the same
localnetwork which is terorized by
firewall.
Someone recommends me cipe
is there something like it for freebsd?
How could I tell the two win boxes
to send all their traffic to bsdbox?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
* Paul Saab [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03 03:32] wrote:
I believe the driver in -current will compile under stable.
It requires some minor hacking which I haven't tested, this
basically disables the hardware checksum offloading because
I'm too tired to figure out the difference at (what the hell
It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any planes to support
VIA 82231 south bridge
for UDMA33/66/100 ?
OK, support has been added to -current, MFC will follow later...
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 11:08:17PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
I'm trying to test and tune speed of freebsd's filesystem in many aspects.
I run recent FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE with new dirprefs code, read tuning(7),
newfs'd my FS, turned softupdates on, have UFS_DIRHASH kernel option.
Also, I've
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:19:48AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
will th gx driver be MFC'ed any time soon? I have a box and a card
sitting around, and was wondering ...
You could use the wx driver (which is in -stable and should work)
until the gx driver is merged.
David.
To
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 03:13:29PM +, David Malone wrote:
I'm trying to test and tune speed of freebsd's filesystem in many aspects.
I run recent FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE with new dirprefs code, read tuning(7),
newfs'd my FS, turned softupdates on, have UFS_DIRHASH kernel option.
Also,
Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WOL only requires a few things of the machine to be woken up:
1. The motherboard must support WOL.
2. The LAN card must support WOL.
3. You must have connected the special WOL cable between the LAN card
and the motherboard.
4.
* PSI, Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03 13:51] wrote:
Have a tricky problem. I am developing code to transfer data over AF_ISO
family sockets. Standard stuff, socket, bind, etc. Nothing tricky. Being
a good little boy I am using C++ (gpp delivered with OS) for
transportability (read make
Sorry - I'm not looking for someone to debug my code (I am actually a
fairly experienced C++ programmer on *gasp* SVR4 which means I create
errors only God can figure out). I apologize if my earlier request
appeared that way (got a few choice comments from some hackers).
All I want to know is if
All I want to know is if anyone else has had problems using C++ (in
general) crashing the kernel during subsequent initialization of the
same program or specifically with AF_ISO family (-liso) sockets. Nothing
more than that.
I suspect that the ISO socket code is woefully under-tested, and
Hi All,
I need to build a statically-linked version of cvs so that I can run
it in a jail. I was hoping someone out there could describe the steps
necessary to build cvs static on 4.4-stable.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox Boucher's Observation:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He who
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hellmuth Michaelis) wrote:
6. The LAN card driver must support waking up of the card and/or the
LAN card driver must not disable waking up of the card.
[ I think we're in violent agreement here, and that we're now quibbling
over subtle differences in the English
In the last episode (Nov 13), Bob Willcox said:
I need to build a statically-linked version of cvs so that I can run
it in a jail. I was hoping someone out there could describe the steps
necessary to build cvs static on 4.4-stable.
Add NOSHARED=YES to the top of
Thanks for the reply, Dan. For some reason adding NOSHARED=YES to the
Makefile didn't seem to work. I wound up explicitly adding:
LDFLAGS+= -static
to the Makefile and that did it. This is strange because from the looks
of it the bsd.prog.mk file should have done this with NOSHARED=YES.
Oh,
Hi,
I have a number of older FreeBSD boxes (running 2.2.8-STABLE) and
I am not able to upgrade beyond 2.2.8 due to some custom software.
Has anyone managed to get a newer version of OpenSSH running on
a 2.2.8 box? I'm not a C programer but I have ported some programs in
the
I've had -STABLE run fine, but of late have had a lot of trouble with
-current. Userland processes during the boot sequence seem to spend a lot
of time just spinning -- it's not clear to me what the cause is, and I
haven't had time to debug.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:16:36PM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
Koster, K.J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am fully aware that -hackers is not the right forum for this discussion,
and I apologise for the noise. I tried the appropriate mailing lists first
and got ignored. You are the second
* Kirk Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03 15:58] wrote:
Hi,
I have a number of older FreeBSD boxes (running 2.2.8-STABLE) and
I am not able to upgrade beyond 2.2.8 due to some custom software.
Has anyone managed to get a newer version of OpenSSH running on
a 2.2.8 box? I'm not
PSI, Mike Smith wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 3.2 (no comments please - I've given plenty of
comments to the powers that be without results). I am currently
rewriting it in C to determine if C++ may be the problem.
Any clues??
The GCC in FreeBSD 3.2 does not support per thread exception
* Kirk Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03 15:58] wrote:
Hi,
I have a number of older FreeBSD boxes (running 2.2.8-STABLE) and
I am not able to upgrade beyond 2.2.8 due to some custom software.
Has anyone managed to get a newer version of OpenSSH running on
a 2.2.8 box? I'm
I now have 4.3 running under VMware on my laptop and main desktop machine
(Asus CVU4X-D) systemI am trying to recompile current on my desktop
system now (Current hangs badly on my laptop)I will try and investigate
the cause of this a little later tonight
--
Glenn Gombert
[EMAIL
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 11:16:08AM +0100, Martin Vana wrote:
| hi,
| I need to set up a packet tunnel for
| two win boxes connected to the same
| localnetwork which is terorized by
| firewall.
| Someone recommends me cipe
| is there something like it for freebsd?
tunneling and ipsec
[ Note reply-to ]
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 12:45:20PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
All I want to know is if anyone else has had problems using C++ (in
general) crashing the kernel during subsequent initialization of the
same program or specifically with AF_ISO family (-liso) sockets. Nothing
On Sunday, 11 November 2001 at 22:37:58 +0100, Paul van der Zwan wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Smith wrote:
These cheap controllers don't have any algorithms at all to speak of;
they're just ATA controllers with BIOS code that supposedly understands
striping/mirroring.
There is
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:56:24PM -0700, Kirk Davis wrote:
I have a number of older FreeBSD boxes (running 2.2.8-STABLE) and
I am not able to upgrade beyond 2.2.8 due to some custom software.
Has anyone managed to get a newer version of OpenSSH running on
a 2.2.8 box? I'm not
26 matches
Mail list logo
