Lajos Zaccomer (ETH) wrote:
You may be interested with my results, thus I summarize briefly what
I am very much surprised of. You were absolutely right with the order
of negotiation messages (not surprised of this). I may not know in
English good (or bad? :-) enough for an RFC. What I was
Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
does anyone know if a simple priority disk scheduler exists for a
recent (4.X) FreeBSD? I don't need anything fancy, basically the POSIX
rtprio equivalent for disks.
The Eclipse people (at Bell) have something like that, but it's based
on an
I'm hoping there is an easy answer to this one...
Is there some way vinum can be tickled such that it writes to all disks
in a plex at once? For instance, say I have a 6 disk RAID5 array
that I'm writing a 200MB file to. Is there some way I can make
vinum attempt to write data to all of the
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Andrew Boothman wrote:
...
appendices is all about FreeBSD and its internals. It's 48 pages long
and is available from
http://www.wiley.com/college/silberschatz6e/0471417432/pdf/bsd.pdf
I like it. The dinosaur book has been a clasic forever. The
appendix
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jason Andresen writes:
I'm hoping there is an easy answer to this one...
Is there some way vinum can be tickled such that it writes to all disks
in a plex at once? For instance, say I have a 6 disk RAID5 array
that I'm writing a 200MB file to. Is there some way I
Dan Langille wrote:
Folks: have a look at this FreshPorts shell script and let me know if
there is a better way to do this.
This script waits for a file to arrive in a directory, then runs a scipt
to process it. It's part of FreshPorts. the procmail script spools the
incoming cvs-all
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 16:46:35
Engine/Pattern = 5.630-1025/212
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 16:49:31
Engine/Pattern = 5.630-1025/212
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 17:27:46
Engine/Pattern = 5.630-1025/212
Message details and virus information
To help identify the email:
The message was titled: freebsd-hackers-digest V5 #371
The message date was: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:27:51
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 17:35:35
Engine/Pattern = 5.630-1025/212
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = new photos from my party!
Scanning Time = 01/28/2002 17:40:03
Engine/Pattern = 5.630-1025/212
Thank you Jason. Yes, it would be helpful. And I had wondered if that
was possible. Cheers.
FWIW: I am now testing the script using the ports/sysutils/daemontools
utilities. That seems to be working well so far. I will be writing a
daemontools article for the Diary and will post the URL
On 27 Jan 2002 at 20:18, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 27), Dan Langille said:
Folks: have a look at this FreshPorts shell script and let me know if
there is a better way to do this.
Apart from maybe using echo instead of forking 'ls', and caching the
list:
while : ; do
Hi,
My name is Lorene
Ledingham and I am a professional recruiter. A client of mine is looking
for a programmer with background in Assembly Language, C++, Unix, etc. and if
anyone on this list can help me with names of people I can network with I would
greatly appreciate it.
Please respond
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:49:59AM -0500, Jason Andresen wrote:
I'm hoping there is an easy answer to this one...
Is there some way vinum can be tickled such that it writes to all disks
in a plex at once? For instance, say I have a 6 disk RAID5 array
that I'm writing a 200MB file to. Is
[Thread moved to -jobs]
On Monday, January 28, 2002, Lorene Ledingham wrote:
Hi,
My name is Lorene Ledingham and I am a professional recruiter. A client of mine is
looking for a programmer with background in Assembly Language, C++, Unix, etc. and if
anyone on this list can help me with
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Thierry Herbelot [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020123 14:24] wrote:
Hello,
I've got an SCSI CD-Writer, which only gives errors when I try to use
cd-record (see full log at the end of the message)
As the problem is identical on a fresh 4.4-Rel
It looks like the TCP recieve checksum issues weren't the only ones we
had to contend with. I've got a couple of new iXsystems 2650's with
3Com 3C996-T's in them and while running cvsup I get long hangs usually
resulting in a lost connection. When the machines recover I see
watchdog timeout
It looks like the TCP recieve checksum issues weren't the only ones we
had to contend with. I've got a couple of new iXsystems 2650's with
3Com 3C996-T's in them and while running cvsup I get long hangs usually
resulting in a lost connection. When the machines recover I see
watchdog timeout
Message details and virus information
To help identify the email:
The message was titled: freebsd-hackers-digest V5 #372
The message date was: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:28:08
I've took a brief look on Unix presentation and was wondering, why author
says that ...most Unix systems have not permitted shared memory because
the PDP-11 hardware did not encourage it...?
Well, it wasn't so obvious deal with PDP-11 MMU, but why you have to tell to
your
students about it
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, DOROVSKOY,IGOR (A-Portsmouth,ex1) wrote:
I've took a brief look on Unix presentation and was wondering, why author
says that ...most Unix systems have not permitted shared memory because
the PDP-11 hardware did not encourage it...?
where'd they get this? that's an odd
On Monday, 28 January 2002 at 18:34:10 +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:49:59AM -0500, Jason Andresen wrote:
I'm hoping there is an easy answer to this one...
Is there some way vinum can be tickled such that it writes to all disks
in a plex at once? For instance, say I
On Monday, January 28, 2002, at 02:49 PM, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, DOROVSKOY,IGOR (A-Portsmouth,ex1) wrote:
I've took a brief look on Unix presentation and was wondering, why
author
says that ...most Unix systems have not permitted shared memory
because
the PDP-11
Is the kernel smart enough to know if there is enough memory available if you
allocate too many nmbclusters? For example, if you have a disk with a kernel
compiled with 25000 clusters and you pop it on a machine with only 64M, will
it crash and burn? Also are clusters allocated out of the
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020128 16:35] wrote:
Is the kernel smart enough to know if there is enough memory available if you
allocate too many nmbclusters? For example, if you have a disk with a kernel
compiled with 25000 clusters and you pop it on a machine with only 64M,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the kernel smart enough to know if there is enough memory available if you
allocate too many nmbclusters?
No.
For example, if you have a disk with a kernel compiled with 25000
clusters and you pop it on a machine with only 64M, will it crash
and burn?
For those
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Justin C.Walker wrote:
It is and it is :-}. At least, Stevens discusses it in Unix Network
Programming, v1, 2e (sec. 20.3). Different systems, alas, treat this
case differently.
My section 20.3 is on UDP Datagram Trunctation...did you mean 17.3
(Routing Sockets:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Justin C.Walker cleopede:
I've took a brief look on Unix presentation and was wondering, why
author says that ...most Unix systems have not permitted shared
memory because the PDP-11 hardware did not encourage it...?
where'd they get this? that's an odd
On Monday, January 28, 2002, at 05:10 PM, Greg Shenaut wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Justin
C.Walker cleopede:
I've took a brief look on Unix presentation and was wondering, why
author says that ...most Unix systems have not permitted shared
memory because the PDP-11 hardware did
On Monday, January 28, 2002, at 05:03 PM, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Justin C.Walker wrote:
It is and it is :-}. At least, Stevens discusses it in Unix Network
Programming, v1, 2e (sec. 20.3). Different systems, alas, treat this
case differently.
My section 20.3 is on UDP
37 matches
Mail list logo
