On Tuesday, 3 February 2004 at 11:55:42 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Sridhar Chellappa wrote:
>
>> How do we debug a freeBSD kernel ? Do we have something similar to
>> "KGDB" that linux offers ?
>
> there is a whole chapter in the handbook about this..
Unfortunately, it'
Bogdan TARU writes:
|
| Hi Hackers,
|
| Ok, now some more infos about my problem:
|
| We have 3 identical webservers (as hw configuration), and the same
| kernel and applications running on all three. They get mostly the same
| traffic (dns round-robined). They all run 4.9-RELEASE. I have
When using the PXE loader and a stock kernel you can specify the root
path as with "option root-path" with a path like
"/usr/diskless/5.2-CURRENT". The server is then derived from the value
of next-server (the siaddr entry in the dhcp packet). If you add
options BOOTP to your kernel this configur
Dear Hackers,
does anyone objects to the attached libusbhid(3) patch? unpatched library
gives me wrong HID page/usage values when i try to parse HID descriptor
from Microsoft Bluetooth keyboard. please see attached patched.txt and
unpatched.txt outputs.
thanks,
max
__
In the last episode (Feb 10), Wes Peters said:
> On Monday 09 February 2004 13:20, Juan Tumani wrote:
> > I have an Intel D845GE m/b w/ a P4 1.7 CPU and I have the box setup
> > to dual boot to either 4.9 or 5.2. Both OS are right off the
> > latest posted iso CD image, i.e., no updates, no kernel
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 11:38:46AM +0100 I heard the voice of
Harti Brandt, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> So if you restore a backup that is say, half a year old, you may
> well have files that belong to no known user, even if restoring to
> the same system.
>
> I suppose that mapping them to a well
On 10 Feb, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Ok looks like this has been spotted before and its a kernel issue
> described here:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bausg0%2416c5%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=13
If the kernel patch mentioned above fixes the problem, I'l
On Monday 09 February 2004 13:20, Juan Tumani wrote:
> I have an Intel D845GE m/b w/ a P4 1.7 CPU and I have the box setup
> to dual boot to either 4.9 or 5.2. Both OS are right off the latest
> posted iso CD image, i.e., no updates, no kernel tweaks, everything
> vanilla right out of the box. I
DFly has incorporated a new organizational structure for gcc3 and
binutils214 that FreeBSD might want to take a look at.
Basically it works like this:
* The vendor code in /usr/src/contrib is named after the major version
release, so e.g. we have /usr/src/contrib/gcc-3.3 (gc
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Andrew wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with sendto returning an error and setting errno to
> ENOBUFS however I am calling select first to make sure the fd is
> writeable (see below for code). s is a raw socket and the data I'm
> sending is 1492 bytes. I haven't changed th
Tim Kientzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) Convert RETURNS(s) into a function rather than a macro.
> 2) Use a ternary (someone else suggested this)
> 3) Remove the printf-like declaration (Yes, this is distasteful.)
> 4) Add an intermediate variable:
> [...]
> Good luck, (let us know what works!
Is vm.max_proc_mmap autotune by maxusers?
If maxusers=0, it determine proc_mmap from RAM size?
Could you please explain the use of net.inet.tcp.tcbhashsize?
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Yaoping Ruan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dung Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:45
Ok looks like this has been spotted before and its a kernel issue
described here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bausg0%2416c5%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=13
I've made a 5.1 and 5.2 patch available from:
ftp://ftp.multiplay.co.uk/pub/games/fps/battlefield1
Suggestions:
1) Convert RETURNS(s) into a function rather than a macro.
2) Use a ternary (someone else suggested this)
3) Remove the printf-like declaration (Yes, this is distasteful.)
4) Add an intermediate variable:
do {
const char *_t = (s) == NULL ? "NULL" : (s);
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 10:31:54AM +, Philip Reynolds wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 35 lines of wisdom included:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:39:45AM +, Philip Reynolds wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Does the magic number not then support multiple ABI's per system
> > > architecture
Thanks for comment.
> - don't use apm or acpi on 4.x
There will be no benefit in terms of performance using acpi on 4.x.
And apm is just unnecessary.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smrgrav)
To: Dung Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:27:
des wrote @ Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:09:03 +0100:
> Part of the patch declares openpam_log(3) as printf-like so gcc can
> check format strings etc. However, openpam_log(3) is also used in
> debugging macros such as this:
>
> #define RETURNS(s) do { \
> if ((s) == NULL) \
> op
While the AIX specific answer is below, what does it have to do with
OpenBSD?
In AIX the answer is a qualified YES -- qualified in that ultimately
there is a limit to the size of the volume group which varies based on
some key parameters (namely PP size and concurrent capability). For
proper opera
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Andrew wrote:
> I have a problem with sendto returning an error and setting errno to
> ENOBUFS however I am calling select first to make sure the fd is
> writeable (see below for code). s is a raw socket and the data I'm
I see something similar has actually been discussed b
Hi,
I have a problem with sendto returning an error and setting errno to
ENOBUFS however I am calling select first to make sure the fd is
writeable (see below for code). s is a raw socket and the data I'm
sending is 1492 bytes. I haven't changed the low water mark for the
socket.
This looks like
Hi,
I have an Intel D845GE m/b w/ a P4 1.7 CPU and I have the box setup to dual
boot
to either 4.9 or 5.2. Both OS are right off the latest posted iso CD image,
i.e., no updates,
no kernel tweaks, everything vanilla right out of the box. I compiled
flops.c on both 4.9
and 5.2 and the 5.2 perf
Hi,
first, this seems to be a good analysis of SVN and a good
starting point for thinking about moving away from CVS.
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Craig Boston wrote:
...
> Comments on importing: It's SLOOW. It took 43.9 hours just for
> src/sys, and this is a relatively speedy system! It starts
All DevX newsletters are now sent from the domain "internet.com." Please use this
domain
name (not the entire "from" address, which varies) when configuring e-mail or spam
filter
rules, if you use them.
DEVX OPEN SOURCE/LINUX UPDATE
Open Source Development News, Articles, and Information from De
On 10 Feb, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
If you don't minde a bit of bloat, maybe changing this:
> openpam_log(PAM_LOG_DEBUG, "returning '%s'", (s)); \
to this:
openpam_log(PAM_LOG_DEBUG, "returning '%s'", (s) != NULL ? (s) : "");
might quiet the warning.
Fill a GCC PR?
I am not expert in these but is it OK that it evaluates the parameter three
times?
Vaclav Haisman
- Original Message -
From: "Dag-Erling Smřrgrav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:09 AM
Subject: how to fool gcc?
I'm having t
Zajcev Evgeny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Maybe just have copy of `s' inside while statement? Something like:
>
>> #define RETURNS(s) do { \
>> if ((s) == NULL) \
>> openpam_log(PAM_LOG_DEBUG, "returning NULL"); \
>> else \
>> openpam_log(PAM_LO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling SmЬrgrav) writes:
> I'm having trouble with some uncommitted OpenPAM patches that I'd like
> to get into the tree. The problem actually doesn't occur with a
> normal build, but it prevents me from building a debugging version of
> libpam.
>
> Part of the patch declar
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Tim Kientzle wrote:
TK>Harti Brandt wrote:
TK>> On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Tim Kientzle wrote:
TK>>
TK>> TK>In this case, I'm considering:
TK>> TK> * If the username exists, use that.
TK>> TK> * If the username does not exist and the UID is not already in
TK>> TK> use, issue
Harish Mohanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> try compiling without optimisation i.e. without the -O flag to gcc.
That is not an option.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
try compiling without optimisation i.e. without the -O flag to gcc.
Harish
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
I'm having trouble with some uncommitted OpenPAM patches that I'd like
to get into the tree. The problem actually doesn't occur with a
normal build, but it prevents me from building a debugging
Danny Braniss wrote:
hi,
im running some experiments, and it seems to me that
setting net.inet.tcp.rfc1644 has the reverse effect.
with sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc1644 = 0, the transaction uses only 6 packets
and it's less than 1 sec, setting net.inet.tcp.rfc1644 to 1 uses
8 packets and takes m
I'm having trouble with some uncommitted OpenPAM patches that I'd like
to get into the tree. The problem actually doesn't occur with a
normal build, but it prevents me from building a debugging version of
libpam.
Part of the patch declares openpam_log(3) as printf-like so gcc can
check format str
hi,
im running some experiments, and it seems to me that
setting net.inet.tcp.rfc1644 has the reverse effect.
with sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc1644 = 0, the transaction uses only 6 packets
and it's less than 1 sec, setting net.inet.tcp.rfc1644 to 1 uses
8 packets and takes more than 1 sec.
with
> Beaver Challenge 2004 is coming!.
> Details in http://osuosl.org/benchmarks/bc/
> We are preparing the tuning guide. Definitely we need suggestions and
> comments.
does the sysctl 'machdep.cpu_idle_hlt' still have any effect? see:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=36729+40701+/usr/loc
Dear colleagues,
I found very strange bug. Actually, bug was introduced at running system with
vinum root, when I did not succeed in mounting explicit root via `boot -a'
prompt. I did a bit of research, and found that there is certainly a bug when
comconsole is enabled:
ad0: 7339MB [15907/15/63]
35 matches
Mail list logo
