Re: suggestions ?

2004-06-03 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, talk about the devil: http://news3.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-06/03/content_1506278.htm This is a potential target application. Erich ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send

qemu; emulators/rtc doesnt send SIGIO, is this patch right?

2004-06-03 Thread Juergen Lock
Hi! Is the following patch to the emulators/rtc port right? qemu (see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=67506) expects it to send SIGIO and i'm not that good at kernel hacking to know if the following is correct... it seems to work for me tho. (Anyone interested in helping fixing

Re: [HEADS-UP] mbuma is in the tree

2004-06-03 Thread Sam Leffler
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 02:49 am, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Bosko, On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 02:51:01PM -0700, Bosko Milekic wrote: B mbuma is an Mbuf Cluster allocator built on top of a number of B extensions to the UMA framework, all included herein. are you going to convert mbuf tag

Re: [HEADS-UP] mbuma is in the tree

2004-06-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: Sare you going to convert mbuf tag allocator to UMA? Now S tags are allocated with malloc(). AFAIK, tags are used heavily in pf, S and forthcoming ALTQ. Moving to UMA should affect their performance S positively. S S You probably

Re: suggestions ?

2004-06-03 Thread Saber Zrelli
thanks Erich , i knew that i was missing some thing :-) i got better idea about what you meant. Hi, talk about the devil: http://news3.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-06/03/content_1506278.htm This is a potential target application. Erich

FreeBSD vs Linux cpu usage measurements

2004-06-03 Thread Steven Hartland
I've been trying to do a direct comparison of game server cpu usages across various OS. Our current primary OS is FreeBSD 5.X running a 200HZ kernel. Initial tests on a dual boot opteron showed Linux using 0% CPU for 32 player servers so I got suspicious. From talking to people it appears that

Re: [HEADS-UP] mbuma is in the tree

2004-06-03 Thread Wes Peters
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 07:12, Bosko Milekic wrote: If you read the paper on mbuma, you'll notice that I point out that it would be worth investigating whether, in scenarios where an m_tag is ALWAYS required per packet (e.g., MAC), providing a secondary zone with pre-allocated

Re: Network config on FreeBSD 5.1 - Help!

2004-06-03 Thread aussie gal
Yeah - I have read it. when I do the ifconfig i get: vr0: flags=8843UP, BROADCAST, RUNNING, SIMPLEX, MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::20e:a6ff:..[hexidecimal ipv6 address]%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopid 0x1 inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff000 broadcast 255.255.255.255 ether 00:0e:a6:.. [hexidecimal ipv4

Re: Network config on FreeBSD 5.1 - Help!

2004-06-03 Thread zera holladay
How do you connect (or want to connect) to your network or to the internet? Do you have your own private network and you connect through a gateway or router, or do you have a DSL modem attached directly to your ethernet card? You are not getting an IP address and your netmask is for a very, very

Re: Network config on FreeBSD 5.1 - Help!

2004-06-03 Thread aussie gal
This is the set-up: I have a High-Speed Internet connection. What you would call a DSL modem connection. I have the main modem connection hooked up to a 4-port hub. Two ports are connected to WinXP boxes and the third one is connected to my freebsd box into the ethernet port supplied by the

Re: Network config on FreeBSD 5.1 - Help!

2004-06-03 Thread zera holladay
How do your Windows XP computers get their ip addresses: are they statically assigned ip addresses or do you have a DHCP server? If you have not configured your Windows XP computers with static ip addresses or you don't know what a static ip address is, then your hub is probably taking care of