hi,
this board (WRAP) has no keyboard, and there is a fix in boot1.S
to take into account such case, but i can't compile a -current a kernel
without kbd (4.x is ok without kbd*), i solved the problem
with a quick hack, just to see if im on the correct track, and a return
with a
Kevin Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I humbly suggest that /bin contain csh and tcsh. Is that too hard?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ll /bin/*csh
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 699446 Nov 5 18:12 /bin/csh*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 699446 Nov 5 18:12 /bin/tcsh*
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:37:57 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ll /bin/*csh
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 699446 Nov 5 18:12 /bin/csh*
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 699446 Nov 5 18:12 /bin/tcsh*
He meant both shells, not a hardlink. csh and tcsh are
Hello? anybody? So how come IPDIVERT option is outright ignored in
system build here?? The system isn't even connected to internet, nor to
any other net anyway!
And as if I don't know how to compile kernel? And it is stock
4.10-RELEASE, too (and 4-STABLE has same problem). The process is
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-11-12 04:11:22 +0100:
The only real problem with having bash as /bin/sh is that people tend
to write scripts using bash-specific features and forget that such
scripts are not portable to systems using a less powerful /bin/sh.
Or the other way around. Bash (at
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: so, Q1: is it possible to compile a 5.3 kernel without kbd,
Doesn't removing atkbd and atkbdc from the kernel do the job?
Warner
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I tried to install Windows XP SP2 on qemu over FreeBSD 6-current
like following command, but failed.
# qemu -boot d -cdrom /dev/cd0 windows.img
Because find_image_format on qemu/block.c is failed. This
problem can be confirmed like following program.
- -
Here are the results of the brief benchmarks that I ran. I posted the
best and worse results out of running each test 5 times.
-
System:
Dual Opteron 244s
RAM 1GB
3 x 36GB U320 SCSI RAID-5 on Adaptec 2120s
-
OS:
FreeBSD snip 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE
you missed the rest of the thread. /bin/csh is not /bin/tcsh. i have
run into a fairly important compatibility problem brought on by this. later.
.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:11:22AM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
Personally I am of the opinion that csh (all versions) should be
removed completely from the base system and relegated entirely to the
ports system. Other than historical reasons there is not much point in
having it in the base system.
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: so, Q1: is it possible to compile a 5.3 kernel without kbd,
Doesn't removing atkbd and atkbdc from the kernel do the job?
this is waht i get if i remove atkbd and atkbdc:
...
MAKE=make sh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: kbd.o(.text+0x30e): In function `kbd_register':
: : undefined reference to `__stop_set_kbddriver_set'
dev/kbd/kbd.c optionalatkbd
dev/kbd/kbd.c optionalkbd
It appears that we have a leftover line in our conf/files lines. None
of the ports appear to have a 'device kbd' in their config files.
There only appears to be one place where it is used, and it appears to
be unnecessary. I'd like to commit the following, but thought I'd ask
here first to make
13 matches
Mail list logo
