On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:40:44 -0800
Avleen Vig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 01:30:59PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
It seems to me that building kernel with icc is currently broken, at
least in 5-STABLE. Could somebody investigate this?
I don't have a problem
Robert
which would generally explain the issues. However, the my.file case is a
bit concerning. Could you confirm that the file descriptor in that case
is definitely pointed at a vnode?
Indeed does not work. It only happens when my.file is a file newly created by
the
shell. If one
hi guys
it's my first post here, BTW i was a linux hacker and linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
and i've a comment here , i think the freebsd kernel source files
aren't well organized as linux ones.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
mohamed aslan wrote this message on Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 10:01 -0800:
it's my first post here, BTW i was a linux hacker and linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
and i've a comment here , i think the freebsd kernel source files
aren't well organized as linux ones.
If you are going
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, mohamed aslan wrote:
hi guys
it's my first post here, BTW i was a Linux hacker and Linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
and I've a comment here , i think the freebsd kernel source files
aren't well organized as Linux ones.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 01:42:16PM -0500, c0ldbyte wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, mohamed aslan wrote:
hi guys
it's my first post here, BTW i was a Linux hacker and Linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
and I've a comment here , i
mohamed aslan wrote:
hi guys
it's my first post here, BTW i was a linux hacker and linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
and i've a comment here , i think the freebsd kernel source files
aren't well organized as linux ones.
You are in some ways correct..
Unfortunatly, as our project
c0ldbyte wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, mohamed aslan wrote:
hi guys
it's my first post here, BTW i was a Linux hacker and Linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
and I've a comment here , i think the freebsd kernel source files
aren't well
Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 01:42:16PM -0500, c0ldbyte wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, mohamed aslan wrote:
hi guys
it's my first post here, BTW i was a Linux hacker and Linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
and I've a comment here , i think the freebsd
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 11:05:30AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
As things have changed, some of the original layout decisions have
become rather
outdated. For a slightly better example, check out the layout of the
DragonflyBSD kernel
sources. Matt took the oportunity to re-arange the
Maybe you are just more familiar to Linux kernel.
I am not a kernel hacker, like you and many people here. But I usually
read source codes, FreeBSD and also NetBSD and Linux, specially the
areas where I am a particular curious. FreeBSD code organization is
close to BSD's roots (you can get
Hello All,
I have a co-located HP DL360 G3 server to which I do not have physical
access. It has 2 x 2.8GHz Xeon CPUs with HTT. One of the ISP's
engineers has confirmed that both CPUs are detected when the BIOS
POSTs.
I have cvsup'd to the latest 5.3R security release and successfully
it's my first post here, BTW i was a linux hacker and linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
Oh, a Linux list member for 3 years. Wow!
and i've a comment here , i think the freebsd kernel source files
aren't well organized as linux ones.
And I think you are wrong and that the Linux
The user mohamed aslan wrote this strange object...:
hi guys
it's my first post here, BTW i was a linux hacker and linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
and i've a comment here , i think the freebsd kernel source files
aren't well organized as linux ones.
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:49:25 +0200 (CEST), Webmaster Shizukana.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The user mohamed aslan wrote this strange object...:
hi guys
it's my first post here, BTW i was a linux hacker and linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
and i've a comment here , i think
The user David Leimbach
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:49:25 +0200 (CEST), Webmaster Shizukana.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The user mohamed aslan wrote this strange object...:
hi guys
it's my first post here, BTW i was a linux hacker and linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
and
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 09:51:23PM +0100, Greg Eden wrote:
Hello All,
I have a co-located HP DL360 G3 server to which I do not have physical
access. It has 2 x 2.8GHz Xeon CPUs with HTT. One of the ISP's
engineers has confirmed that both CPUs are detected when the BIOS
POSTs.
I
On Monday 28 March 2005 03:51 pm, Greg Eden wrote:
Hello All,
I have a co-located HP DL360 G3 server to which I do not have physical
access. It has 2 x 2.8GHz Xeon CPUs with HTT. One of the ISP's
engineers has confirmed that both CPUs are detected when the BIOS
POSTs.
I have cvsup'd to the
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:48:55PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2005 03:51 pm, Greg Eden wrote:
Hello All,
I have a co-located HP DL360 G3 server to which I do not have physical
access. It has 2 x 2.8GHz Xeon CPUs with HTT. One of the ISP's
engineers has confirmed that
Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
I have a DL380 g3 with dual P4-3.2GHz 1MB L3 cache, the kern conf has
just options SMP to make it work. Here is the top part and bottom part
of dmesg from boot:
...
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
...
kern.smp.active: 1
kern.smp.disabled: 0
kern.smp.cpus: 2
you should see 4 cpus
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 03:02:02AM +0400, Rojer wrote:
Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
I have a DL380 g3 with dual P4-3.2GHz 1MB L3 cache, the kern conf has
just options SMP to make it work. Here is the top part and bottom part
of dmesg from boot:
...
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
...
mohamed aslan wrote:
hi guys
it's my first post here, BTW i was a linux hacker and linux kernel
mailing list member for 3 years.
and i've a comment here , i think the freebsd kernel source files
aren't well organized as linux ones.
I left a job last year where I developed linux kernel code
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:42:52PM +0400, Igor Shmukler wrote:
For my purposes the Linux/DragonFly functionality is needed.
Is there a way to know that once a patch that correctly resolves corner cases
for
vn_fullpath() (including name cache changes) exists it will be committed to
the
Bruce,
Thank you for your reply. If you could email me a tarball, I would appreciate
it.
I don't have that much practical experience with FreeBSD name cache. However, I
had
some expeirence with other systems.
I think the big question here do other developers agree that name cache could
use
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:40:44 -0800
Avleen Vig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 01:30:59PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
It seems to me that building kernel with icc is currently broken, at
least in 5-STABLE. Could somebody investigate this?
meant to send this to the list too... sorry
Are you implying DragonFly uses FPU/SIMD? For that matter does any kernel?
I believe it does use SIMD for some of it's fast memcopy stuff for
it's messaging system
actually. I remember Matt saying he was working on it.
On 2005-03-28 21:17, Joerg Sonnenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 11:05:30AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
As things have changed, some of the original layout decisions have
become rather outdated. For a slightly better example, check out the
layout of the DragonflyBSD
27 matches
Mail list logo
