2006/3/6, dima [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry my ignorance. Gleb Smirnoff pointed that out privately already. I
looked at the code
and it seems very much like OpenSolaris implementation to me. You can't
propagate
priority properly if you don't hold all the current lock holders
somewhere. I tried to
I just saw this slashdotted article:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the sort of thing that can be implemented
as a GEOM layer? The idea is bloody clever but sounds like a bit of a hack
right now.
Ashley
From: Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just saw this slashdotted article:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the sort of thing that can be implemented
as a GEOM layer? The idea is bloody clever but sounds like a bit of a hack
right now.
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 07:17:20AM -0600, Sergey Babkin wrote:
From: Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just saw this slashdotted article:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the sort of thing that can be
implemented
as a GEOM layer? The
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 14:43 +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 07:17:20AM -0600, Sergey Babkin wrote:
From: Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just saw this slashdotted article:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the
From: Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just saw this slashdotted article:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
Well, I've been running around with this kind of idea for
around 10 years now. Never actually implemented it though.
I can't
Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just saw this slashdotted article:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the sort of thing that can be
implemented as a GEOM layer? The idea is bloody clever but sounds
like a bit of a hack right now.
From: Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: NetBSD disk backup over network
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:33:37 -0600 (CST)
From: Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just saw this slashdotted article:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:33:37AM -0600 I heard the voice of
Sergey Babkin, and lo! it spake thus:
You can easily save the stream of updates as a redo log (well,
that's the idea I've been running around with).
Isn't that what the gjournal SoC thing was about?
--
Matthew Fuller
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
You can easily save the stream of updates as a redo log (well,
that's the idea I've been running around with).
Isn't that what the gjournal SoC thing was about?
No, not exactly. The idea was to make a journal of a GEOM device I/O
requests on a separate device in
Hey
Im not sure if this is the right list, but anyway, let me know if im wrong.
What im trying to do is, have a custom program run on a specific tty. Say like
ttyv4, or so. But I
would like to do this without having to login to this ttyv.
So instead of being presented with a login option, I
Hi,
I am a user of freebsd 6.0 box. I have couple jails on this box.
One of them are closed apache and mysql. Mysqld creates mysql.sock
for local connections in /tmp dir inside it's jail. Second jail
where i have apache runnig needs to connect to mysqld. Right now
it connect tru IP connection to
Cole wrote:
Hey
Im not sure if this is the right list, but anyway, let me know if im wrong.
What im trying to do is, have a custom program run on a specific tty. Say like
ttyv4, or so. But I would like to do this without having to login to this ttyv.
So instead of being presented with a login
Yeah.
That does help quite a lot. However, I did find something regarding this called
own-tty, but that
was for linux, and also written in like 1998.
http://www.canonical.org/~kragen/sw/usershell.html
I was actually hoping to do something similar. In that I was hoping to just
write a single
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 06:40:58PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
find(1)'s -prune primary does not work if depth-first traversal (-d,
-depth, also implied by -delete) is in effect. The reason is that it is
(obviously) not possible to prune a directory when visiting it after all
entries in it.
Le Tuesday 7 March 2006 15:46, Dag-Erling Smørgrav a écrit :
Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just saw this slashdotted article:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the sort of thing that can be
implemented as a GEOM layer? The
16 matches
Mail list logo
