This would be awesome, please do it.
Scott
Benno Rice wrote:
One of the things that I found useful both in starting the PowerPC port
and in doing the XScale stuff I'm working on is making the SYSINIT stuff
done by mi_startup() verbose. This generally requires hacking your own
code into
L4Linux exists, but it seems to be more of a means for testing out
and developing the L4 microkernel, but would there be any practical
reason to sandbox the FreeBSD kernel and force it to run as a user-
land service on top of the L4::Pistachio kernel? (for example)
Well, you could do neat stuff
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 11:49 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (May 10), Iasen Kostov said:
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 11:18 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (May 10), Iasen Kostov said:
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:32 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at
This would be awesome, please do it.
I agree, I've done something like this in a much more hackishly-way for
the XBox port as well, but your code is much cleaner than mine was :-)
Go for it, may others benefit from it!
--
Rink P.W. Springer- http://rink.nu
John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 16:34, Eric Anderson wrote:
I have a Core Duo system (2 2GHz CPUs), that continually locks up (I
believe it panics) when exiting xorg with both CPU's enabled. If I have:
hint.apic.0.disabled=1
in device.hints, I only use one CPU, however it exits
Hi guys:
To access sg_table in kernel address, I need to map the starting physical
address of a segment into a kernel address. As I know that, we can use
phystovirt()/bustovirt(), or kmap()/kmap_atomic() to map a bus/physical
address or a physical page into a kernel address in Linux, but I did
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:36:24PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
In my environment non-atomic updates of NFS export lists are not
acceptable. So, I decided to correct this problem. As the result
mountd, kern/vfs_export.c were completely rewritten, mount.h,
vfs_mount.c and nfs_srvsubs.c also got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this message on Thu, May 11, 2006 at 17:45 +0800:
To access sg_table in kernel address, I need to map the starting physical
address of a segment into a kernel address. As I know that, we can use
phystovirt()/bustovirt(), or kmap()/kmap_atomic() to map a bus/physical
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:43 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:32 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:28 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote:
Hello
I (probably) have some problem with a hosting server machine halting
about once a 30 to minute (probably when the
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:43 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:32 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:28 +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote:
Hello
I (probably) have some problem with a hosting server machine halting
about once a 30 to minute (probably when the
hi!
i just bought an Intel Pentium D-930 (3ghz dual-core)
and wonder why i just only have CPU0 and CPU1, when i compile with SMP...
sysctl says:
machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 0
is it right or i should see CPU 2 and 3 starting during the boot?
thanks for your help!
ps: i even compiled this option in
I think intel chips with dual core don't have hyperthreading. The
operating system sees the second core like it would with
hyperthreading only.
On May 11, 2006, at 12:00 PM, OxY wrote:
hi!
i just bought an Intel Pentium D-930 (3ghz dual-core)
and wonder why i just only have CPU0 and
thanks a lot for your help!
- Original Message -
From: Shane Ambler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeBSD Mailing Lists freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: enabling hyper-threading on intel dual-core
On 12/5/2006 1:30, OxY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
A few months ago I pointed out a problem with AMD64
dualcore, and I even tracked the problem down to a few
commits at a particular date and time... Now that 6.1
is finally released, I tried it, and the problem is
still there... the boot process will crash when
detecting the second SATA
930 is perfect, fast enough, no need to spend more money, thanks :)
- Original Message -
From: Achim Patzner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OxY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: enabling
i just bought an Intel Pentium D-930 (3ghz dual-core)
and wonder why i just only have CPU0 and CPU1, when i compile with
SMP...
You would need a Pentium Extreme (840, 955 or 965) for this. And
quite a bit of cash.
Achim
___
Eric Anderson wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 16:34, Eric Anderson wrote:
I have a Core Duo system (2 2GHz CPUs), that continually locks up (I
believe it panics) when exiting xorg with both CPU's enabled. If I
have:
hint.apic.0.disabled=1
in device.hints, I only use one
On Thursday 11 May 2006 16:45, Eric Anderson wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 16:34, Eric Anderson wrote:
I have a Core Duo system (2 2GHz CPUs), that continually locks up (I
believe it panics) when exiting xorg with both CPU's enabled. If I
have:
On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
[...]
the above points to a filel that says 6.0 errata
Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't
tell me these will be shoved under the rug.
Send patches.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
On Thursday 11 May 2006 07:41, Eric Anderson wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 16:34, Eric Anderson wrote:
I have a Core Duo system (2 2GHz CPUs), that continually locks up (I
believe it panics) when exiting xorg with both CPU's enabled. If I
have:
On 2006.05.11 20:53:42 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
[...]
the above points to a filel that says 6.0 errata
Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems?
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 11 May 2006 16:45, Eric Anderson wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 16:34, Eric Anderson wrote:
I have a Core Duo system (2 2GHz CPUs), that continually locks up (I
believe it panics) when exiting xorg with both CPU's
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Patches? For what? It's too late now, 6.1 has been released. I sent
reminders to the RE team and i made it quite clear on the lists that the
quota issue should be described in the relnotes/errata before the
release. If the RE team chooses to ignore major bugs and pretend
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
[...]
the above points to a filel that says 6.0 errata
Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't
tell me these will be shoved under the rug.
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 11 May 2006 16:45, Eric Anderson wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 16:34, Eric Anderson wrote:
I have a Core Duo system (2 2GHz CPUs), that continually locks up (I
believe it panics) when exiting xorg with both CPU's
I hope you had a great Earth Day!
I thought you'd want to try this:
Adopt your earth and get a free screensaver!
Click here to get started:
http://friends.earthscreen.com/?r=kTFUNzQgFBdWBmINASkCi=gmail[EMAIL
PROTECTED]p=1z=1tc=11
___
I hope you had a great Earth Day!
I thought you'd want to try this:
I'm getting a $25 gift card for Vivavi earth-friendly products. Get yours too.
Click here to get started:
http://friends.earthscreen.com/?r=MTFUNzQgFBdWBmINASkCi=gmail[EMAIL
PROTECTED]p=8z=1tc=11
On 05/11/06 20:53, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
[...]
the above points to a filel that says 6.0 errata
Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems?
Don't tell me these will be
Jonathan Noack wrote:
The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't
some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues
thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est
la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Jonathan Noack wrote:
The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't
some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues
thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est
la vie. It's always a good idea to check
30 matches
Mail list logo
