To resurrect a fairly old thread...
On Mon, 2006-Mar-27 11:23:42 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 26 March 2006 at 19:17:19 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
My work system runs separate X servers on two heads (rather than
ximerama) and I have problems with windows occasionally refusing to
On Thu, 2006-Jul-20 06:31:08 -0500, Sergey Babkin wrote:
This is likely an fvwm1 problem. I use it too (without
2 monitors) and after some time something gets broken in
its focus handling, and the windows stop getting focus.
Restarting fvwm clears up the problem.
I've seen that as well and I'm
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Tue, 2006-Jul-18 22:11:45 -0300, Charles A. Landemaine wrote:
Aside from the fact that some vendors don't cooperate to release
hardware specifications, is there something we could do to revert this
situation?
I suspect the major problems are lack of interface
FWIW;
I went on to check that Embedded C++ that David Nugent mentioned, and I found
this:
http://www.caravan.net/ec2plus/
Acording to the QA section:
The goal of EC++ is to provide embedded systems programmers with a subset of
C++ that is easy for the average C programmer to understand and
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
From your dmesg excerpt it seems that you have at least
three USB controllers in that machine. Depending on your
requirements, it might make sense to disable all of them
_except_ one, and then connect your USB devices to that
one
From: Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To resurrect a fairly old thread...
On Mon, 2006-Mar-27 11:23:42 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 26 March 2006 at 19:17:19 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
My work system runs separate X servers on two heads (rather than
ximerama) and I have problems
Intron wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Getting action from vendors has been unsuccessful in the past - the
Free OS community (Linux + *BSD) is too small for vendors to be
concerned about.
I cannot agree with you. Linux has achieved much more support from
hardware vendors than FreeBSD.
On 7/20/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW;
I went on to check that Embedded C++ that David Nugent mentioned, and I found
this:
http://www.caravan.net/ec2plus/
Acording to the QA section:
The goal of EC++ is to provide embedded systems programmers with a subset of
C++ that
From: Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, I've promised Greg a script to dump the X protocol
from binary log, then I was busy and and forgot about it.
Is there still any interest in this tool?
What does your script do? I've used xmon in the (distant) past but
it is designed to sit in the
Intron wrote this message on Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 19:25 +0800:
On the other hand, so many hardware vendors (especially some small
enterprises, which are eager to obtain software support)
have publicized data sheets of their integrated circuit products,
but so few people would write hardware
New motd-welcome message for FreeBSD.
http://www.cwt.uz/motd
best regards
--
Timur Yuldashev
Technical Administrator, IT Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carlson Wagonlit Travel
5,Center-2 street, Mirzo-Ulugbek region
70,Tashkent,Uzbekistan
Reception: +998 71 1326267(68,69,70)
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Oliver Fromme wrote:
PS: I think this thread might be inappropriate for the -hackers list.
How about moving it to either -hardware or -chat? (I watch them all, so
either is fine with me.)
The problem with -hardware or -chat, and, even to a certain extent,
-hackers is
On Thursday, 20 July 2006 at 18:37:08 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
To resurrect a fairly old thread...
On Mon, 2006-Mar-27 11:23:42 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 26 March 2006 at 19:17:19 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
My work system runs separate X servers on two heads (rather than
On Thursday, 20 July 2006 at 6:31:08 -0500, Sergey Babkin wrote:
From: Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To resurrect a fairly old thread...
On Mon, 2006-Mar-27 11:23:42 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 26 March 2006 at 19:17:19 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
My work system runs
14 matches
Mail list logo
