on 31/03/2007 05:23 Daniel Eischen said the following:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, David E. Cross wrote:
I recently ran into a problem where the 32bit JVM won't run on a 64bit host.
I, and at least one other person in -java thinks it has to do with 32 bit
KSE
on a 64bit kernel (I have a vague
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 09:21:33PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
[...]
If we've started to delete the pattern space, we should print the
text in place of it because `c' is for `change'. BSD and GNU seds
have this bug, but Solaris sed doesn't have it.
[...]
By the way, I found myself w/o a Solaris
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 04:26:23 +0200
Pieter de Goeje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
I have these files:
--- loader.cpp ---
#include stdio.h
#include tls.h
int main() {
tls = 0;
printf(%d\n, tls);
}
--- tls.cpp ---
#include tls.h
int __thread tls;
--- tls.h
David E. Cross wrote:
I recently ran into a problem where the 32bit JVM won't run on a 64bit
host. I, and at least one other person in -java thinks it has to do
with 32 bit KSE on a 64bit kernel (I have a vague memory on this
somewheres WAY back). Is this still the issue? Could someone
On Saturday 31 March 2007 03:16, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 31/03/2007 05:23 Daniel Eischen said the following:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, David E. Cross wrote:
I recently ran into a problem where the 32bit JVM won't run on a 64bit
host.
I, and at least one other person in -java thinks it has
On 2007-03-31 15:02, Yar Tikhiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 09:21:33PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
[...]
If we've started to delete the pattern space, we should print the
text in place of it because `c' is for `change'. BSD and GNU seds
have this bug, but Solaris sed doesn't
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 31 March 2007 03:16, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 31/03/2007 05:23 Daniel Eischen said the following:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, David E. Cross wrote:
I recently ran into a problem where the 32bit JVM won't run on a 64bit host.
I, and at least one
Hi,
I'm trying to create sort of user-space access control system based on
allowing/denying syscalls. I was able (after a few problems) to start
ptracing program, stop at every enter/exit from system call, inspect
arguments etc. What I'm however trying to do, is denying access to
syscalls. In
On zaterdag 31 maart 2007, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
There is no reason whatsoever to compile main binary code with -f[pP]ic.
Executables are not shared libraries and stuffing position independent
code into them makes no sense.
You are right ofcourse. However it doesn't explain why it won't work.
On zaterdag 31 maart 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Hello List,
I have these files:
--- loader.cpp ---
#include stdio.h
#include tls.h
int main() {
tls = 0;
printf(%d\n, tls);
}
--- tls.cpp ---
#include tls.h
int __thread tls;
10 matches
Mail list logo
