On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
The thing I am not sure about is how ioctl's would get mangled on
the way through.
They get interpreted as linux ioctl, as they are handled by the
linuxulator. You could try to write a wrapper there...
Yeah..
Maybe an FS approach would be
I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as /mnt/camera
on /dev/da0s1.
Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
Now 'mount' command shows:
/dev/da0s1 on /mnt/camera (msdosfs, local)
'umount /dev/da0s1' command tells that device is not configured correctly.
Quoting Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Mon, 17 Dec 2007
16:26:58 +1030):
I am wondering if anyone has tried building such a beast?
ie a Lunux libusb that will be able to access devices in FreeBSD..
The reason I'd like it is that I want to use this
http://rmdir.de/~michael/xilinx/ in
Yuri wrote:
I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as /mnt/camera
on /dev/da0s1.
Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
I've understood that the only solution to this currently is don't do
that then. :)
___
Hi,
I am reading the code for boot0 (/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot0/boot0.S).
This is the part i am trying to understand:
/*
* Initialise segments and registers to known values.
* segments
Hi
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:07:02AM -0800, Yuri wrote :
I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as /mnt/camera
on /dev/da0s1.
Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
Personal recipe when this kind of things happens (generally caused by a
camera
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:16:02PM +0530, M.Girish Rao wrote:
Whats the memory location of start?
I'm going off of memory of my old x86 days, so be kind to me. :-) By
the look of it, it's BOOT_BOOT0_ORG, which is 0x600. I'm basing this on
the flags passed to cc (actually ld) during linktime.
Quoting Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Mon, 17 Dec 2007
21:39:39 +1030):
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
AFAIR HPS' USB stack has linux compatibility, maybe you should ask
him / have a look at it.
I had a look at the code but I can't see any Linux related code.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:58:27AM -0600, Sergey Babkin wrote :
Would not umount -f do the trick?
I tried it without particular care one time on a failing device and
experienced an instant system reboot (was it caused by the faulty disk
or by a limitation in the implementation of the system
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:07:02AM -0800, Yuri wrote :
I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as
/mnt/camera
on /dev/da0s1.
Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
Personal recipe when this kind of things happens (generally caused by a
camera switching
On 2007-12-17, Alejandro Pulver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote
- Some got hung in unmount issues are to be sorted out (these
appeared on Linux, and they might or might not appear on FreeBSD).
/quote
IIRC you are saying that any user could make umount hang. And you said
this is an
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:41:16 +0100
Csaba Henk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[This message has also been posted to gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers.]
On 2007-12-17, Alejandro Pulver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote
- Some got hung in unmount issues are to be sorted out (these
appeared on Linux,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:07:02AM -0800, Yuri wrote:
I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as /mnt/camera
on /dev/da0s1.
Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
This triggers known and extremely painful to fix bugs in FreeBSD.
Your best work-around is to
I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as
/mnt/camera
on /dev/da0s1.
Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
I submitted this late at night. Now in the morning another solution
came to my mind. I thought I will find it in replies but I didn't.
In case
Kip Macy wrote:
he's just plain misinforme
Until we know what he is referring to we can't actually say that.
-Kip
OK he said I could post from our private email so here goes. There were
bits in and around relating to the
Solaris /dev/poll support (and the mechanism's limitations) which
On Dec 17, 2007 1:25 PM, James Mansion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
he's just plain misinforme
Until we know what he is referring to we can't actually say that.
-Kip
OK he said I could post from our private email so here goes. There were
bits in and around relating to the
On Friday 07 December 2007 06:23:51 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:43:00AM +0100, Gerald Heinig wrote:
Hi Sonja,
Hi everyone.
I'm working on a kernel module that needs to maintain a large
structure
in memory. As this structure could grow too big to be
Kip Macy wrote:
Do you have a set of regression tests for libev? It sounds like they
would worth having to regression test kqueue.
I would have thought that libevent and libev should both the checked
against kqueue. Also APR
and everything else that has support. I'm not the author of libev
On 18/12/2007 5:09 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:07:02AM -0800, Yuri wrote:
I had USB camera connected and recognized as umass0 and mounted as /mnt/camera
on /dev/da0s1.
Camera was disconnected while it was still mounted.
This triggers known and extremely painful to fix
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:32:48AM -0800, Yuri wrote :
In case of USB device (which device in question in this problem
happens to be) usbd can be used to mount it.
If attach/detach events trigger mount/unmount commands this problem
shouldn't exist. I didn't try though.
The problem is that
Hi Antony,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:36:19AM +1100, Antony Mawer wrote :
Every time this comes up it's branded with the really hard to fix
message, but I seem to recall the last time this came up Matt Dillon
chimed in and said he'd managed to fix it in Dragonfly without too
much pain.
I
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:26:58 +1030 Daniel O'Connor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wondering if anyone has tried building such a beast?
ie a Lunux libusb that will be able to access devices in FreeBSD..
Well, the devel/libusb port builds out of the box
Hi,
i run command for kernel profiling purpose:
pmcstat -S instructions -O /tmp/sample.out
and i get error:
pmcstat: ERROR: Initialization of the pmc(3) library failed: No such file
or directory
I've compile my FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE kernel in i386 machine :
device hwpmc
options HWPMC_HOOKS
Check ports 'cpuid' -
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel; CPUID level 10
Intel-specific functions:
Version 06f6:
Type 0 - Original OEM
Family 6 - Pentium Pro
Model 15 -
Extended model 0
Stepping 6
Reserved 0
Odds are you have a post-P4 Intel processor.
-Kip
On Dec 17, 2007 7:47 PM, binto [EMAIL
check with cpuid:
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel; CPUID level 10
Intel-specific functions:
Version 06f7:
Type 0 - Original OEM
Family 6 - Pentium Pro
Model 15 -
Extended model 0
Stepping 7
Reserved 0
Extended brand string: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5335 @ 2.00GHz
CLFLUSH instruction cache
25 matches
Mail list logo
