Desmond Chapman wrote:
It's dependent upon kbuild. Since the developers have no intention of fixing
the issue, I would like a tutorial on converting the kmk file to a normal
Makefile.
What is kmk? Google only shows it's used with VirtualBox and nowhere
else. If it's something the authors of
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:11:37 +0200
Subject: Re: need help with vbox
Desmond Chapman wrote:
It's dependent upon kbuild. Since the developers have no intention of fixing
the issue, I would
Gentleman, I agree with both of you.
Thanks for everything.
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:32:48 +0200
Subject: Re: need help with vbox
Bruce Cran wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Desmond Chapman wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Desmond Chapman wrote:
It's dependent upon kbuild. Since the developers have no intention of fixing
the issue, I would like a tutorial on converting the kmk file to a normal
Makefile.
What is kmk? Google only shows it's used with VirtualBox and nowhere
else. If
Bruce Cran wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Desmond Chapman wrote:
It's dependent upon kbuild. Since the developers have no intention of
fixing the issue, I would like a tutorial on converting the kmk file
to a normal Makefile.
What is kmk? Google only shows it's used with VirtualBox and
-On [20081016 16:43], Srinivas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have a theoretical understanding of the PC architecture and the
details but have no idea of how things go under the hood(for a real
computer).
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0123706068/ - Computer Organization and Design: The
Hardware/Software
Hello,
I have a theoretical understanding of the PC architecture and the
details but have no idea of how things go under the hood(for a real
computer). I think it would be very useful for me(as well as
beginners) to know how things work real-time. Even though it is not a
correct mailing list, I
Desmond Chapman wrote:
Gentleman, I agree with both of you.
Thanks for everything.
Sorry if it seemed terse - I wasn't trying to discourage you.
Translating from one Makefile type into another is similar to
translating from one programming language to another - you need someone
who knows both
Srinivas wrote:
Hello,
I have a theoretical understanding of the PC architecture and the
details but have no idea of how things go under the hood(for a real
computer). I think it would be very useful for me(as well as
beginners) to know how things work real-time. Even though it is not a
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:17:47 -, Desmond Chapman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's dependent upon kbuild. Since the developers have no intention of
fixing the issue, I would like a tutorial on converting the kmk file to
a normal Makefile.
I think you are barking at the wrong tree. :-) I
I'm doing a large transfer from an SMB mounted drive, about 2TB of
files. After about 250G, it hanging. Of course any process that
tries to access that drive hangs as well.
Is there anyway to get those processes killed off and remount the
drive without rebooting? I haven't had much luck so
2008/10/16, Chris Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm doing a large transfer from an SMB mounted drive, about 2TB of
files. After about 250G, it hanging. Of course any process that
tries to access that drive hangs as well.
Is there anyway to get those processes killed off and remount the
I think a PCI device can communicate with another PCI device directly
without the intervention of the CPU.
Excerpt from PCI Express System Architecture
...
PCI Transaction Model - Peer-to-Peer
A Peer-to-peer transaction shown as Transaction 3 in Figure 1-5 on
page 20 is the direct transfer of
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a PCI device can communicate with another PCI device directly
without the intervention of the CPU.
Absolutely. Happens a fair amount in embedded networking systems (among
others).
The host is responsible for enumeration and resource
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering, for FreeBSD images, is there a symbol that one could look for,
to indicate if image had debug symbols? I know you could destroy that by just
stripping, I just wanted to know if there is any way to definitely tell, short
of firing up
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Chuck Robey wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering, for FreeBSD images, is there a symbol that one could look for,
to indicate if image had debug symbols? I know you could destroy that by just
stripping, I just wanted to know if there is any
I've been getting a lot of recurring questions about the status of Xen
support in FreeBSD and Xen configuration issues - the answers to which
are changing frequently enough that simply adding a FAQ wouldn't make
sense. I expect that initially the mailing list will be the
Dailykip, consisting of
17 matches
Mail list logo
