[dropped stable@ since I'm not on it and
I suspect it may not accept non-member posts]
BTW, can someone knowledgeable tell me if watchdog better
be firing SMI or NMI when it runs down?
My bet is on NMI, but who knows.
It may depend on whether you want the BIOS, or FreeBSD, handling
the
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Ed Schouten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the idea was to ensure that kbd-kb_locked variable only takes values
0 (zero) and 1 (one).
I often use constructs like these to do that:
foo = bar ? 1 : 0;
Maybe !!bar
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[dropped stable@ since I'm not on it and
I suspect it may not accept non-member posts]
BTW, can someone knowledgeable tell me if watchdog better
be firing SMI or NMI when it runs down?
My bet is on NMI, but who knows.
It may
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:35:31AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Ed Schouten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the idea was to ensure that kbd-kb_locked variable only takes values
0 (zero) and 1 (one).
I often use
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:35:31AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Ed Schouten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the idea was to ensure that kbd-kb_locked
Garrett Cooper schrieb:
(I feel like I'm getting off on a bikeshed topic, but...)
1. What dialect of C was it defined in? Is it still used in the
standard dialect (honestly, this is the first time I've ever seen it
before, but then again I am a younger generation user)?
Dialect? The !
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:50:38AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:35:31AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Ed Schouten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Maksim Yevmenkin
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Christoph Mallon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Cooper schrieb:
(I feel like I'm getting off on a bikeshed topic, but...)
1. What dialect of C was it defined in? Is it still used in the
standard dialect (honestly, this is the first time I've ever seen it
Garrett Cooper schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Christoph Mallon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Cooper schrieb:
(I feel like I'm getting off on a bikeshed topic, but...)
1. What dialect of C was it defined in? Is it still used in the
standard dialect (honestly, this is the first
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you really want to split hairs, ! only negates the logic value,
whereas ~ actually negates the bits. So technically, you're not
flipping 0 to make 1 and vice versa, but instead flipping 0 to make
non-zero, etc. There is a clear distinction in
Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I start watchdogd I see the following messages:
timer enabled
timeout set to 28 ticks
and then a flow of messages:
timer reloaded
Then I kill -9 watchdogd.
timer reloded messages are no longer produced.
And there are no other messages.
But
Christoph Mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't try to argue about style(9). IMO it's horribly outdated, but
there are conservative forces, which would prefer to cling to KR. At
least we got function prototypes!
If there's something specific in style(9) you don't like, you are
welcome to
on 05/12/2008 10:50 Garrett Cooper said the following:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:35:31AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Ed Schouten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL
Nate Eldredge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 4 Dec 2008 14:43:
...
pain to clean up. '-net tap' works fine, but requires root privileges and
No.
is more work to set up.
Yes, and this must be as root, but you can use later the tap device
as unprivileged user. (Isn't it a virtual network jack,
Garret,
Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:50:38AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
1. What dialect of C was it defined in? Is it still used in the
standard dialect (honestly, this is the first time I've ever seen it
before, but then again I am a younger generation user)?
It is the standard negation
I posted here a month or two ago about being amazed that some system
management cards can share a physical ethernet port. Some of you responded
that it doesn't always work.
Well... I've encountered this and I'm wondering if I can work around it
somehow.
The ones that work are in Dell 1950-III
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Christoph Mallon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Cooper schrieb:
(I feel like I'm getting off on a bikeshed topic, but...)
1. What dialect of C was it defined in? Is it still used in the
standard dialect (honestly,
Nate Eldredge wrote:
int bangbang(int x) { return !!x; }
int ternary(int x) { return x ? 1 : 0; }
Stylewise, I prefer
int notzero(int x) { return x!=0; }
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Nate Eldredge wrote:
int bangbang(int x) { return !!x; }
int ternary(int x) { return x ? 1 : 0; }
Stylewise, I prefer
int notzero(int x) { return x!=0; }
icc -O0 compiles notzero the same as bangbang (better than ternary). tcc
Hello everyone,
In the process of migrating the last of a few Linux servers to FreeBSD, we
ran in to a bit of a snag with one of our scripts when BSD wc didn't have an
equivalent to the Linux -L. This flag tells wc to keep track of the longest
line in the input.
Here's a little diff to add this
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Sheldon Givens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
In the process of migrating the last of a few Linux servers to FreeBSD, we
ran in to a bit of a snag with one of our scripts when BSD wc didn't have an
equivalent to the Linux -L. This flag tells wc to keep
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Sheldon Givens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
In the process of migrating the last of a few Linux servers to FreeBSD, we
ran in to a bit of a snag with one of our scripts when BSD
What's the problem having it? The total code is mere bytes and it eases the
transition for others who are migrating from Linux.
You're absolutely right in that it can be done with awk (fairly simply, too)
but it doesn't hurt to explore options. Additionally, with awk, you can't
get other figures
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 03:10:56PM -0800, Sheldon Givens wrote:
What's the problem having it? The total code is mere bytes and it eases the
transition for others who are migrating from Linux.
You're absolutely right in that it can be done with awk (fairly simply, too)
but it doesn't hurt to
Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Sheldon Givens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
In the process of migrating the last of a few Linux servers to FreeBSD, we
ran in to a bit of a snag with one of our scripts when BSD wc didn't have an
equivalent to the Linux -L. This
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 03:10:56PM -0800, Sheldon Givens wrote:
What's the problem having it? The total code is mere bytes and it eases the
transition for others who are migrating from Linux.
You're absolutely right in
I've successfully built it in multiple circumstances. The only thing I'm
worried about (I'm on the road now and can't test) is what will occur if wc
is fed a zero-length input... ie, a touched file or a echo | wc -L.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 01:14:58 +0200
Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 03:10:56PM -0800, Sheldon Givens wrote:
What's the problem having it? The total code is mere bytes and it eases the
transition for others who are migrating from Linux.
You're absolutely right
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 14:14:32 -0800, Sheldon Givens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
In the process of migrating the last of a few Linux servers to
FreeBSD, we ran in to a bit of a snag with one of our scripts when BSD
wc didn't have an equivalent to the Linux -L. This flag tells wc to
New diff -u:
--- /usr/src/usr.bin/wc/wc.c2004-12-27 14:27:56.0 -0800
+++ wc/wc.c 2008-12-05 14:33:21.0 -0800
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@
#include wchar.h
#include wctype.h
-uintmax_t tlinect, twordct, tcharct;
-int doline, doword, dochar, domulti;
+uintmax_t tlinect, twordct,
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Sheldon Givens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've successfully built it in multiple circumstances. The only thing I'm
worried about (I'm on the road now and can't test) is what will occur if wc
is fed a zero-length input... ie, a touched file or a echo | wc -L.
On
31 matches
Mail list logo
