I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely deprecated. ps goes to great lengths to implement width
limitations, and any time I've seen people
/usr/src/sys/modules/vesa/../../i386/isa/vesa.c: In function
'vesa_set_mode':
/usr/src/sys/modules/vesa/../../i386/isa/vesa.c:1117: error: duplicate
case value
anyone seeing this as well or is this a local f***up ?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Am 25.08.2009 um 13:23 schrieb Marc Balmer:
/usr/src/sys/modules/vesa/../../i386/isa/vesa.c: In function
'vesa_set_mode':
/usr/src/sys/modules/vesa/../../i386/isa/vesa.c:1117: error:
duplicate case value
anyone seeing this as well or is this a local f***up ?
fwiw, problem is still there
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:40:54AM -0700, Brian Somers wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely deprecated. ps goes to great
* Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely deprecated. ps goes to great lengths to implement
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 15:44:47 Ed Schouten wrote:
* Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be
* Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch wrote:
Am 25.08.2009 um 13:23 schrieb Marc Balmer:
/usr/src/sys/modules/vesa/../../i386/isa/vesa.c: In function
'vesa_set_mode':
/usr/src/sys/modules/vesa/../../i386/isa/vesa.c:1117: error:
duplicate case value
anyone seeing this as well or is this a local
Ed Schouten napisa:
* Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely deprecated. ps goes to great
* Adrian Penisoara a...@freebsd.ady.ro wrote:
Maybe we should also think about compatibility with System V Unix / Linux
-- I have encountered quite a lot of scripts expecting ps -ef to give an
all processes output. It would not hurt to review what the Linux folks did
with their ps(1) -- it
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Ivan Radovanovic riv...@gmail.com wrote:
Ed Schouten napisa:
* Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 15:44:47 Ed Schouten wrote:
* Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 08:48 -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 15:44:47 Ed Schouten wrote:
* Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing
I have become to own Gigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H motherboard:
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Motherboard/Products_Spec.aspx?ClassValue=MotherboardProductID=3004ProductName=GA-MA780G-UD3H
It is based on AMD 780G + SB700.
BTW, CPU I am using is Athlon II X2 250.
Sorry for the broadcast
Anybody has any code for AMD SB700 watchdog driver?
I see that there is none in FreeBSD and I'd like to write one.
So I could re-use anything that you have for a faster start.
In any case, I expect the driver to be rather simple.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
According to SB700 specifications its SMBus controller is very similar to one in
PIIX4.
The differences that I see so far:
1. Interrupt Line/Interrupt Pin PCI configuration registers (0x3c, 0x3d) do not
specify interrupt number that the controller could use:
This register specifies which
Does anybody know if Gigabyte provides special ACPI interfaces for HWM on their
motherboards? Maybe something like ASUS does (acpi_aiboost)?
Or do they access HWM chip directly?
They have this EasyTune software, so they must be doing something.
DSDT of GA-MA780G-UD3H doesn't even provide TZ.
Brian Somers wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely deprecated. ps goes to great lengths to implement width
limitations, and any
Brian Somers wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely deprecated. ps goes to great lengths to implement width
limitations, and
Doug Barton napisa:
Brian Somers wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely deprecated. ps goes to great lengths to implement
Ivan Radovanovic wrote:
So, if the developer is presented with a task of developing utility to
list running processes on the machine the right way to solve this
problem is to implement it exactly the way the ps is implemented (ie, to
please some aesthetic criteria (ie to format output to some
Doug Barton napisa:
If you're developing your own app to display running processes
implement it any way you wish. That's totally unrelated to the
question at hand.
Doug
I totally disagree with you - being against change means that you
believe it is done the best way it could be done.
Ivan Radovanovic wrote:
Doug Barton napisa:
If you're developing your own app to display running processes
implement it any way you wish. That's totally unrelated to the
question at hand.
Doug
I totally disagree with you - being against change means that you
believe it is done the best
Meanwhile, if you interested in any information about this motherboard - data
dumps, outputs from tools, etc - please let me know, I will try my best to
provide
that.
it would be interesting to see a dmesg as a starting point.
Sam Fourman Jr.
___
Doug Barton napisa:
Ivan Radovanovic wrote:
I totally disagree with you - being against change means that you
believe it is done the best way it could be done.
This argument is so non-sequitur that I'm tempted not to respond, but
no, that's not what I'm saying at all. What I'm saying
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 21:27 +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Le Tuesday 25 August 2009, Sam Fourman Jr. a écrit :
Meanwhile, if you interested in any information about this motherboard -
data dumps, outputs from tools, etc - please let me know, I will try my
best to provide that.
it
,--- You/Ivan (Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:02:56 +0200) *
| Feel free to take a crack at this and send the results to the list for
| review. Improving the documentation is always a worthy goal.
|
| I would do that for sure if everyone thinks this ps behavior is
| something that should be kept
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 4:02:56 pm Ivan Radovanovic wrote:
Doug Barton napisa:
Ivan Radovanovic wrote:
I totally disagree with you - being against change means that you
believe it is done the best way it could be done.
This argument is so non-sequitur that I'm tempted not to
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 04:09:09PM +0200, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
I usually want to see ps(1) output in easily-read columns. Without width
limits, this can't be guaranteed.
I would strongly object to the complete removal of any option to limit the
output width of ps(1) and make it easily
Le Tuesday 25 August 2009, Sam Fourman Jr. a écrit :
Meanwhile, if you interested in any information about this motherboard -
data dumps, outputs from tools, etc - please let me know, I will try my
best to provide that.
it would be interesting to see a dmesg as a starting point.
here you
Le Tuesday 25 August 2009, Robert Noland a écrit :
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 21:27 +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Le Tuesday 25 August 2009, Sam Fourman Jr. a écrit :
Meanwhile, if you interested in any information about this
motherboard - data dumps, outputs from tools, etc - please let me
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 22:14 +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Le Tuesday 25 August 2009, Robert Noland a écrit :
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 21:27 +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Le Tuesday 25 August 2009, Sam Fourman Jr. a écrit :
Meanwhile, if you interested in any information about this
Alex Goncharov napisa:
,--- You/Ivan (Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:02:56 +0200) *
| Feel free to take a crack at this and send the results to the list for
| review. Improving the documentation is always a worthy goal.
|
| I would do that for sure if everyone thinks this ps behavior is
|
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Andriy Gapona...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have become to own Gigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H motherboard:
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Motherboard/Products_Spec.aspx?ClassValue=MotherboardProductID=3004ProductName=GA-MA780G-UD3H
It is based on AMD 780G + SB700.
Andriy Gapon said the following on 2009-08-25 18:35:
I have become to own Gigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H motherboard:
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Motherboard/Products_Spec.aspx?ClassValue=MotherboardProductID=3004ProductName=GA-MA780G-UD3H
It is based on AMD 780G + SB700.
BTW, CPU I am using is
Could you please forward me the patch to make it work in polling mode ? I'd
like to test it as I've been trying to make intpm work with a SB400 (which
should be quite the same as yours) but system hangs when I try to force
polling mode (didn't have the specs nor all the differences you just
Ivan Radovanovic wrote:
Doug Barton napisa:
Ivan Radovanovic wrote:
I totally disagree with you - being against change means that you
believe it is done the best way it could be done.
This argument is so non-sequitur that I'm tempted not to respond, but
no, that's not what I'm saying
Le Tuesday 25 August 2009, Bernt Hansson a écrit :
Andriy Gapon said the following on 2009-08-25 18:35:
I have become to own Gigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H motherboard:
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Motherboard/Products_Spec.aspx?ClassV
alue=MotherboardProductID=3004ProductName=GA-MA780G-UD3H
At 11:50 AM -0700 8/25/09, Doug Barton wrote:
Brian Somers wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely deprecated. ps goes to
38 matches
Mail list logo
