On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:40:54 -0700 Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely deprecated. ps goes
Brian Somers wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:40:54 -0700 Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely
Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org writes:
To clarify, my proposal is to silently ignore the -w switch (any/all of them)
and to remove the code that reads the terminal width and truncates some
columns based on the result (or based on 132).
The pros:
- ps's code becomes simpler. It was
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:40:09PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Brian Somers, and lo! it spake thus:
I think this is a shame as I find the pros more compelling than the
cons, and I'm sure there are more than a few supporters out there on
hackers@ that will stay silent.
FWIW, I'm in favor of at
Dag-Erling Smørgrav napisa:
Actually, ls does pretty much the same thing (use a different layout
when run on a tty), and it's far from the only Unix utility to do so.
Usually, the tty layout is pretty while the non-tty layout is easier
to work with in scripts.
Actually ls doesn't work the
Matthew D. Fuller fulle...@over-yonder.net writes:
FWIW, I'm in favor of at least carefully examining whether the cons
really disqualify the change.
They do. Breaking scripts is not acceptable under any circumstances.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
Hi,
On 27 August 2009 am 06:53:36 Steve Watt wrote:
In 4a954a35.4030...@icyb.net.ua, a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
Assuming that ECC data lanes are connected between the two on
motherboard, and given that BIOS doesn't perform any ECC
setup (nor there is any option to control that) - would it be
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:30:15AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
how should it be done at OS level at all when the OS is loaded
into RAM?
Copy the kernel to the video RAM, jump to it, enable ECC, copy back.
Joerg
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de writes:
Erich Dollansky er...@apsara.com.sg writes:
how should it be done at OS level at all when the OS is loaded
into RAM?
Copy the kernel to the video RAM, jump to it, enable ECC, copy back.
Not just the kernel - you have to copy all the memory
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 5:07:16 pm remodeler wrote:
I am hoping for input on a patch I want to apply to the MBR of a FreeBSD
8-BETA3 AMD64 server. I need a serial console on this server. The ASUS
motherboard (amibios) has PCI and PCI-e expansion slots, and a Moschip MCS9820
UART (serial
In 200908271130.18073.er...@apsara.com.sg, er...@apsara.com.sg wrote:
Hi,
On 27 August 2009 am 06:53:36 Steve Watt wrote:
In 4a954a35.4030...@icyb.net.ua, a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
Assuming that ECC data lanes are connected between the two on
motherboard, and given that BIOS doesn't perform any
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:42 PM, John Baldwinj...@freebsd.org wrote:
One thing to note is that ktrace only logs voluntary context switches (i.e.
call to tsleep or waiting on a condition variable). It specifically does not
log preemptions or blocking on a mutex,
I was not aware, thanks.
so
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 04:14:39PM -0400, Linda Messerschmidt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:42 PM, John Baldwinj...@freebsd.org wrote:
One thing to note is that ktrace only logs voluntary context switches (i.e.
call to tsleep or waiting on a condition variable). It specifically does
13 matches
Mail list logo
