Re: What tty changes - question on porting ltmdm and hcfmdm to FreeBSD 8

2010-04-24 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:27:12 -0700 Ted Mittelstaedt t...@mittelstaedt.us wrote: Setting aside the question of why do we break software that a lot of people use (these chips are in use on a lot of laptops) is there a document somewhere that explains what changes need to be made in code

Re: How to change vnode operations ?

2010-04-24 Thread Lukáš Czerner
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:22:57 +0300 From: Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com To: Lukáš Czerner czerner.lu...@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to change vnode operations ? On (23/04/2010 08:10), Lukáš Czerner wrote: On

Re: Keyboard scancodes

2010-04-24 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:20:50 +0200, Michael Cardell Widerkrantz m...@hack.org a écrit : I was recently given an original Happy Hacking Keyboard. As I sometimes work in the FreeBSD console, I wanted to have my usual console keymap adjusted to the new keyboard, but didn't know the scancode for

Re: Distributed SSH attack

2010-04-24 Thread jhell
On 04/16/2010 05:18, krad wrote: On 16 April 2010 09:39, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote: Jeremy Lea wrote: Hi, This is off topic to this list, but I dont want to subscribe to -chat just to post there... Someone is currently running a distributed SSH attack against one of my boxes -

Re: What tty changes - question on porting ltmdm and hcfmdm to FreeBSD 8

2010-04-24 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: 20100424102255.12d78...@ernst.jennejohn.org Gary Jennejohn gljennj...@googlemail.com writes: : On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:27:12 -0700 : Ted Mittelstaedt t...@mittelstaedt.us wrote: : :Setting aside the question of why do we break software that a lot of : people use :

kern+world / ports make options

2010-04-24 Thread Pegasus Mc Cleaft
Hello Hackers Current, I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a separate set of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel independently of a ports build? Right now, I use the base GCC to compile the world and kernel, and GCC44 for

Re: kern+world / ports make options

2010-04-24 Thread Tom Evans
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft k...@mthelicon.com wrote: Hello Hackers Current,        I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a separate set of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel independently of a ports build?        

Re: What tty changes - question on porting ltmdm and hcfmdm to FreeBSD 8

2010-04-24 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
On 4/24/2010 8:29 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message:20100424102255.12d78...@ernst.jennejohn.org Gary Jennejohngljennj...@googlemail.com writes: : On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:27:12 -0700 : Ted Mittelstaedtt...@mittelstaedt.us wrote: : :Setting aside the question of why do we

Re: kern+world / ports make options

2010-04-24 Thread Doug Barton
On 04/24/10 09:42, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote: Hello Hackers Current, Please don't crosspost. If you're not what list to post to, the algorithm is: If the question is about a port, or the ports in general, use freebsd-ports@, otherwise use freebsd-questi...@. This post should have gone to -ports.

Re: Distributed SSH attack

2010-04-24 Thread krad
On 24 April 2010 14:46, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: On 04/16/2010 05:18, krad wrote: On 16 April 2010 09:39, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote: Jeremy Lea wrote: Hi, This is off topic to this list, but I dont want to subscribe to -chat just to post there... Someone is

BIO_FLUSH and ips(4)

2010-04-24 Thread YONETANI Tomokazu
Hello. The ServeRAID driver, or ips(4), seems to distinguish read or write requests with a macro called ips_read_request(), which is defined as #define ips_read_request(iobuf) ((iobuf)-bio_cmd == BIO_READ) in its strategy routine and a few other places. So when the request is

Re: BIO_FLUSH and ips(4)

2010-04-24 Thread Xin LI
Hi, On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:20 PM, YONETANI Tomokazu qhwt+f...@les.ath.cx wrote: Hello. The ServeRAID driver, or ips(4), seems to distinguish read or write requests with a macro called ips_read_request(), which is defined as  #define ips_read_request(iobuf)               ((iobuf)-bio_cmd