On 10 June 2010 05:21, Max Laier m...@love2party.net wrote:
Is there something that can be done to speedup the call to
if_indextoname(), or would it be worthwhile for me to submit a patch that
adds the ability to skip the interface lookup as an arp(8) option?
how about the attached:
This
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:12:54 -0700
Garrett Cooper yaneurab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2010, at 6:25 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:13:56AM -0400, jhell wrote:
On 06/09/2010 04:14, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
Hi hackers!
While discussing my project's implementation
Hi all,
I would like to share with you my work in Summer of Code for Producing a
New FreeBSD Kernel Theme in the field of Reducing Size of Kernel for
Embedded and I will be glad to receive your comments. Download the attached
file please and I will be happy to connect with you
or download it
Currently, the defaults are:
kern.ipc.semmni: 10
kern.ipc.semmns: 60
but there are several nontrivial pieces of software that would use much
more; two examples are PostgreSQL (the database) and Mono (the .net clone).
I'd like to increase these defaults to:
kern.ipc.semmni: 50
kern.ipc.semmns:
On 06/10/10 13:30, Mohammed Farrag wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to share with you my work in Summer of Code for Producing a
New FreeBSD Kernel Theme in the field of Reducing Size of Kernel for
Embedded and I will be glad to receive your comments. Download the attached
file please and I
On Thursday 10 June 2010 10:05:24 Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 10 June 2010 05:21, Max Laier m...@love2party.net wrote:
Is there something that can be done to speedup the call to
if_indextoname(), or would it be worthwhile for me to submit a patch
that adds the ability to skip the interface
exactly and I explained with an example how I would do that practically.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 01:35:47PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
kern.ipc.semmni: 10 - 50
kern.ipc.semmns: 60 - 300
Looks like a good idea.
This change is not as critical as before [...] but increasing the
defaults would be a convenience move, to save some
reconfiguration-and-reboot hassle when
Quoting jhell jh...@dataix.net (from Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:54:16 -0400):
That would lead me to believe that the elimination of this sysctl would
be better suited to solve the outcome of cases like this.
And leads me to believe that it still rests on the end-user to tell
whether or not they have
Quoting Gary Jennejohn gljennj...@googlemail.com (from Thu, 10 Jun
2010 10:18:01 +0200):
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:12:54 -0700
Garrett Cooper yaneurab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2010, at 6:25 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:13:56AM -0400, jhell wrote:
On 06/09/2010
I'm looking for some technical docs about FreeBSD's network stac virt. I saw a
paper from the wiki and little else. The paper seems to focus mostly on the
paralielization of the network stack more than the framework for a virtualized
network.
I want to compare it against OpenSolaris' crossbow,
On 6/10/10 3:07 PM, Fernando Gleiser wrote:
I'm looking for some technical docs about FreeBSD's network stac virt. I saw a
paper from the wiki and little else. The paper seems to focus mostly on the
paralielization of the network stack more than the framework for a virtualized
network.
I
How about exposing a simple userspace API for doing this, rather than
doing it via sysctl?
That way you could simply tie alternative overrides in as needed for
builds (eg, environment variables setting overrides; and/or pointing
to a configuration file with such) but not affect any runtime
13 matches
Mail list logo
