Hi,
On 2010-07-20, Garrett Cooper wrote:
I ran into an issue last night where apparently several apps make
faulty assumptions w.r.t. whether or not access(2) returns functional
data when running as a superuser.
New implementations are discouraged from returning X_OK unless at
least
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
...
This seems wrong for directories. It should say ... unless the file
is 'executable'. 'executable' means searchable for directories, and
the above shouldn't apply.
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
On 2010-07-20, Garrett Cooper wrote:
I ran into an issue last night where apparently several apps make
faulty assumptions w.r.t. whether or not access(2) returns functional
data when running as a superuser.
New implementations are
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi Hackers,
I ran into an issue last night where apparently several apps make
faulty assumptions w.r.t. whether or not access(2) returns functional
data when running as a superuser.
POSIX says:
In early proposals, some inadequacies in the
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
- See a recent PR about unifdefed CAPABILITIES code in vaccess(). ?(The
?comment says that the code is always ifdefed out, but it now always
?unifdefed in.) ? I don't quite
5 matches
Mail list logo