On 8 May 2011 01:22, Damjan Marion damjan.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to implement support for embedded switch on WRT350Nv2 router
which is based on 88F5181L SoC (ARM). FreeBSD already have support for
embedded gigabit card (if_mge) but in case if this router MAC is connected
On May 8, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 8 May 2011 01:22, Damjan Marion damjan.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to implement support for embedded switch on WRT350Nv2 router
which is based on 88F5181L SoC (ARM). FreeBSD already have support for
embedded gigabit card
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 07:22:23PM +0200, Damjan Marion wrote:
Hi,
I would like to implement support for embedded switch on WRT350Nv2 router
which is based on 88F5181L SoC (ARM). FreeBSD already have support for
embedded gigabit card (if_mge) but in case if this router MAC is connected
On May 8, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 07:22:23PM +0200, Damjan Marion wrote:
Hi,
I would like to implement support for embedded switch on WRT350Nv2 router
which is based on 88F5181L SoC (ARM). FreeBSD already have support for
embedded gigabit card
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 03:52:29PM +0200, Damjan Marion wrote:
On May 8, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 07:22:23PM +0200, Damjan Marion wrote:
Hi,
I would like to implement support for embedded switch on WRT350Nv2 router
which is based on
On May 7, 2011, at 8:24 PM, 兰清 wrote:
Hi Devin,
Hi Lan,
This loader menu is awesome!
Thank you.
But as I opinion, items (1,6,7) and (2,3,4,5) are two different thing.
Hmmm. You're right.
1.Boot[Enter]
6.Escape to loader prompt
7.Reboot
These options are
hackers,
Test
--
Regards, (jhell)
Jason Hellenthal
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
hackers,
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:54:18PM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
hackers,
Test
My appologies. this message was never supposed to leave the outbox.
Instead of hitting one key I hit another. Please disregard.
Thanks.
--
Regards, (jhell)
Jason Hellenthal
List, - Please reply-to freebsd...@freebsd.org
Recently I have been going over some changes in the configurations that
are possible with the rc subsystem and to my dismay I have found some
inconsistencies with in particular the way rc.conf.d directory is
processed and the arguments that are
On May 8, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sun, 8 May 2011 10:48:55 -0700 Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com wrote:
I would like to see general consensus from the community for
separating the items before moving ahead with such a non-trivial
change.
IMO:
- I agree that there
On Sun, 8 May 2011 10:48:55 -0700 Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com wrote:
I would like to see general consensus from the community for
separating the items before moving ahead with such a non-trivial
change.
IMO:
- I agree that there are two different types of actions
- having 2 distinct blocks
There's really only room for one or two more menu items.
Perhaps some items could be moved to a 2nd level menu?
1) boot multiuser mode ( default )
2) boot single user mode
3) menu to set boot options
4) help
Would be nice: a fix for having to lean on a key autorepeating
for a couple seconds.
Hi Folks,
I've been given the opportunity to work in GSoC 2011 to replace our base
regex library with a more modern one and given that the regex code is
something essential probably there are lots of interested parties so I
decided to open a thread here about my plans and the approach that I
Hello;
Thanks Gabor for this cool project!
--- On Sun, 5/8/11, Gabor Kovesdan ga...@kovesdan.org wrote:
...
- It doesn't provide the REG_STARTEND macro, which is our
non-POSIX extension. Still, it is useful and easy to
implement so it is not a problem either.
Our sed requires REG_STARTEND
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
http://lh3lh3.users.sourceforge.net/reb.shtml
http://sljit.sourceforge.net/regex_perf.html
re2 is in C++ has a PCRE API, while TRE is in C has a
POSIX API. Both have BSD copyright. Is it worth considering
Em 09-05-2011 02:17, Bakul Shah escreveu:
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
http://lh3lh3.users.sourceforge.net/reb.shtml
http://sljit.sourceforge.net/regex_perf.html
re2 is in C++ has a PCRE API, while TRE is in C has a
POSIX API. Both have
On Mon, 09 May 2011 02:37:10 BST Gabor Kovesdan ga...@kovesdan.org wrote:
Em 09-05-2011 02:17, Bakul Shah escreveu:
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
http://lh3lh3.users.sourceforge.net/reb.shtml
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Bakul Shah ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
On Mon, 09 May 2011 02:37:10 BST Gabor Kovesdan ga...@kovesdan.org wrote:
Em 09-05-2011 02:17, Bakul Shah escreveu:
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
Hello, Bakul.
You wrote 9 мая 2011 г., 5:17:09:
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
http://lh3lh3.users.sourceforge.net/reb.shtml
http://sljit.sourceforge.net/regex_perf.html
re2 is much faster at price of memory. I don't remember details
On Mon, 09 May 2011 08:30:57 +0400 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello, Bakul.
You wrote 9 =EC=E0=FF 2011 =E3., 5:17:09:
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
http://lh3lh3.users.sourceforge.net/reb.shtml
20 matches
Mail list logo
