On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
This is an implementation of dup3 for FreeBSD:
man page here (with a FreeBSD patch coming soon):
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/dup.2.html
Is this implementation correct? If so any objection to
On 12 Jan 2012, at 06:03, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 11 January 2012 15:26, Gerald McNulty gmn...@gmail.com wrote:
Using IP_BINDANY to facilitate transparent proxying works as specified.
According the ip(4) man page and sys/netinet/ip_output.c, the
PRIV_NETINET_BINDANY privilege is required in
Hello Eitan,
* Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com, 20120112 06:01:
This is an implementation of dup3 for FreeBSD:
man page here (with a FreeBSD patch coming soon):
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/dup.2.html
Is this implementation correct? If so any objection to adding
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:01:29AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
This is an implementation of dup3 for FreeBSD:
man page here (with a FreeBSD patch coming soon):
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/dup.2.html
Is this implementation correct? If so any objection to adding this
* Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl, 20120112 10:56:
I suspect that not long after we add dup3(), some random person asks us
to implement F_DUP3FD. Any chance you can implement this without using a
system call, but through fcntl()?
Never mind. This seems to be non-trivial, as fcntl() just takes
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:08:40PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:01:29AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
This is an implementation of dup3 for FreeBSD:
man page here (with a FreeBSD patch coming soon):
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/dup.2.html
Hi Kostik,
* Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com, 20120112 11:08:
+int
+sys_dup3(struct thread * const td, struct dup3_args * const uap) {
The td and uap are not constant in the prototypes generated by
makesyscalls.sh. This makes me seriosly wonder was the patch compiled at
all
Thank you for your comments. I will hopefully have version 2 of the
diff tonight.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote:
I suspect that not long after we add dup3(), some random person asks us
to implement F_DUP3FD. Any chance you can implement this without using a
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote:
I'm currently looking at the source code of ps, but adding
a field for the FIB isn't as trivial as I thought because
ps only sees struct kinfo_proc (via sysctl kern.proc.*)
which doesn't contain the FIB. procstat
Okay - here is version 2 (compile and run tested)
Index: sys/kern/kern_descrip.c
===
--- sys/kern/kern_descrip.c (revision 229830)
+++ sys/kern/kern_descrip.c (working copy)
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
/* Flags for do_dup() */
On 1/12/12 6:04 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote:
I'm currently looking at the source code of ps, but adding
a field for the FIB isn't as trivial as I thought because
ps only sees struct kinfo_proc (via sysctl
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:07:58 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
Okay - here is version 2 (compile and run tested)
Index: sys/kern/kern_descrip.c
===
--- sys/kern/kern_descrip.c (revision 229830)
+++ sys/kern/kern_descrip.c (working
12 matches
Mail list logo
