All that's missing is a way to tell the RC system to use a different
rc.conf file (like rc.conf.mobile, or rc.conf.wireless or
rc.conf.whatever), and to run through the RC setup based on that file.
... and to be able to switch between two configurations at runtime,
without taking down services
Lets make a summary.
What functionality would be good to have in FreeBSD that doesn't exist:
1) runlevels with arbitrary names. runlevel change would start and stop
right services.
2) exploit startup parallelism.
What we do not want to change:
- file structure which is simple. one file in
ifconfig_em0=inet ... ( default (or unknown) runlevel )
ifconfig_em0_foolevel=inet ... ( foolevel runlevel )
ifconfig_em0_maintenance=inet ... ( maintanence runlevel )
too ?
well - possible BUT... but well.
this will not require only changing launcher script for rc.d/* things
but
Am 21.06.2012, 12:22 Uhr, schrieb Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
Lets make a summary.
What functionality would be good to have in FreeBSD that doesn't exist:
1) runlevels with arbitrary names. runlevel change would start and
stop right services.
2) exploit startup
Am 21.06.2012, 12:56 Uhr, schrieb Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
ifconfig_em0=inet ... ( default (or unknown) runlevel )
ifconfig_em0_foolevel=inet ... ( foolevel runlevel )
ifconfig_em0_maintenance=inet ... ( maintanence runlevel )
too ?
well - possible BUT... but
On Jun 20, 2012 11:03 PM, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
wrote:
scripts, i deleted most of it and put startup sequence in single file.
It was plain horror.
You would weep if you saw Solaris's SMF, then. Everything is
i don't really know what i've seen. i've installed
On Monday, June 18, 2012 4:46:32 pm Mike Meyer wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:42:27 -0500
Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/17/12 19:43, Mike Meyer wrote:
Eric McCorklee...@shadowsun.net wrote:
The -m32 flag seems to be the culprit; removing it fixes the problem.
On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:56:30 pm Daniil Cherednik wrote:
Hi!
I am trying to continue the work started by DavidXu on implemention of fast
syscalls via sysenter/sysexit.
http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/sysenter/kernel/
I have ported it on FreeBSD9. It looks like it works. Unfortunately
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 4:44:41 pm Ruslan Bukin wrote:
Hi.
I have the problem with different behavior of snd_hdspe(4) sound card
driver initialization.
If I load the driver by hand using kldload everything works fine,
but in case of loading driver at boot time (loader.conf) or
On 2012-Jun-18 19:18:57 -0400, Brandon Falk bfalk_...@brandonfa.lk wrote:
As the original poster of this thread, I can also say that Doug is
correct. The issue is not rc, it is the actual kernel boot process.
I've videoed my netbook rebooting and gone through the video in slow
motion and that
Hi all,
I m using libmagic for my application on FreeBSD. I have some problems.
libmagic doenst return properly mimetype of file. For example :
system is FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE .
file --mime-type example.7z application/octet-stream
file example.7z 7-zip archive data, version 0.3
file --mime-type example.7z application/x-7z-compressed
file example.7z 7-zip archive data, version 0.3
why does not FreeBSD behave like linux
you answered it yourself just below.
and if i need to update magic.mgc , how can i do that ? i need the
edit/update
no ideas?
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i am not sure if it is related at all to FreeBSD, but maybe someone here know
the solution. Anyway it is somewhat FreeBSD related for sure as you will see
from description.
I bought used IP 16 port KVM connected to few servers, in
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:10:06 +0200
Daniel Gerzo dan...@rulez.sk wrote:
Hello,
Just picking a random message related to this issue. Maybe Tom might
update us a bit with the status of his project ;-)
Oh, put me on the spot, thanks Daniel! :)
Citát Wojciech Puchar
Hello,
Just picking a random message related to this issue. Maybe Tom might
update us a bit with the status of his project ;-)
Citát Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
- monitor running services and restart them if they crash
should not be done, or at least not default.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:22:08PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Lets make a summary.
What functionality would be good to have in FreeBSD that doesn't exist:
1) runlevels with arbitrary names. runlevel change would start and stop
right services.
2) exploit startup parallelism.
Try something like the following...
service_runlevels=1 2 3 4 5
And provide a way to say...
Well - i agree with you.
just invent a syntax to define service runlevels as all except
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
On Jun 21, 2012 5:15 PM, Jason Hellenthal jhellent...@dataix.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:22:08PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Lets make a summary.
What functionality would be good to have in FreeBSD that doesn't exist:
1) runlevels with arbitrary names. runlevel change
should not be done, or at least not default.
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2010-10-2010-12.html#FreeBSD-Services-Control-(fsc)
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2012-01-2012-03.html#FreeBSD-Services-Control
separate and optional program.
that's acceptable, except i have no
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:19:27PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012 5:15 PM, Jason Hellenthal jhellent...@dataix.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:22:08PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Lets make a summary.
What functionality would be good to have in FreeBSD that
On 06/21/2012 05:28 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
32.0s - rc scripts (mounting root through VTY login prompt)
I think that there is some confusion about what I wrote originally, so
let me clarify. From the time that /etc/rc starts through the time that
the prompt appears almost all of the time is
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:22:08 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Lets make a summary.
What functionality would be good to have in FreeBSD that doesn't exist:
1) runlevels with arbitrary names. runlevel change would start and stop
right services.
With a
1) runlevels with arbitrary names. runlevel change would start and stop
right services.
With a couple of additions:
- it should be easy to see which services are on at a given runlevel.
already proposed in rc.conf
- it should be easy to see which runlevels a service is on at.
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:01:41 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
1) runlevels with arbitrary names. runlevel change would start and stop
right services.
With a couple of additions:
- it should be easy to see which services are on at a given runlevel.
z
my point is that if you put new startup system in place of old, nothing
will change with your existing rc.conf!
Also true in the counter proposal.
so i miss something about the counterproposal.
please point me out
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
Your arrogance is astounding.
Did you read man hier? Unfamiliarity does not make it incomprehensible.
There's more going on than just unfamiliarity. Earlier versions were
unfamiliar to someone used to Linux or BSD, but easy
manage if you're doing something pre-configured (like
starting/stopping an existing service), but if you want to do
something custom you have to do a *lot* of digging to figure out how
to make it work. Some of the new stuff (like NWAM network
configuration) is not even configurable without a
user.vdr writes:
Recording doesn't require any compression unless you are transcoding
in real-time. There's no difference between recording ATSC, NTSC, PAL,
etc, and it's actually irrelevant what the stream is.
This is incorrect. ATSC is compressed before broadcast, so
you receive the data
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 02:01:35 -0400
David Schultz d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
On Sat, 26 May 2012 22:45:37 +1200
Sam Lin sam.lin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi FreeBSD fellows,
Those who are using LaTeX on FreeBSD must know that tetex has been
On 21/06/2012 21:41, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
In portage, there is a knob package_provided meaning that the package
referenced as being provided is installed externally and that portage
does not need to resolve said dependancy, as it is already there.
I do not know of a similar
On 2012-Jun-21 10:09:01 -0700, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/21/2012 05:28 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
32.0s - rc scripts (mounting root through VTY login prompt)
I think that there is some confusion about what I wrote originally, so
let me clarify. From the time that /etc/rc starts
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:42:49PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
There's no need to do a wholesale replacement of the RC system in
FreeBSD to support this concept. What you are describing are service
profiles. And we already have a single file that describes the
default service profile for
On 2012-Jun-21 00:17:11 +0200, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
wrote:
- Lack of dependency handling for manual start/stop
which is not really a problem and often an adventage.
In your opinion. IMO, runlevels are a mostly a work-around to hide
the lack of proper dependency
On 06/21/2012 06:49 PM, Atte Peltomäki wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:42:49PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
There's no need to do a wholesale replacement of the RC system in
FreeBSD to support this concept. What you are describing are service
profiles. And we already have a single file that
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:20:44 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
should not be done, or at least not default.
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2010-10-2010-12.html#FreeBSD-Services-Control-(fsc)
35 matches
Mail list logo
