happy that FreeBSD is among the selected organization.
I am a third year student interested to work in the field of embedded
system. I applied last year and the title of my project was Kernel Size
why only in embedded system. smaller programs are always good :)
And yes FreeBSD kernel
On 4/9/2013 11:53 PM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
this host can run x11 apps! so 'Huge' is a relative matter, my first
PDP11/45 has 64K :-) danny
Bah. Real old farts ran munix on a 32k PDP 11/03- shell and apps in the
low 16k and the kernel in the upper. Or was it the other way around? At
Tektronix,
Hello, deeptech71.
You wrote 10 апреля 2013 г., 1:00:10:
d Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Is system version (system is snapshot from Mar 30) is external and
modern?
d Lev Serebryakov wrote:
It is very sad, that external compiler cannot be used with fresh
sources (when headers are different). We
On Monday, April 08, 2013 6:39:31 am Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Superpage promotion happens automatically when consecutive data are
accessed
according to the proper heuristic.
and in practice - unless there are only few processes, never really works.
this is a result of my own tests.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:09:35PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, deeptech71.
You wrote 10 2013 ??., 1:00:10:
d Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Is system version (system is snapshot from Mar 30) is external and
modern?
d Lev Serebryakov wrote:
It is very sad, that
On Tuesday, 9 April 2013 at 22:18, Joshua Isom wrote:
Would clang's LTO help for size? I know work's starting on the bsd
elftools ld, but I doubt it has any LTO support yet. Running -Os on the
kernel as a whole instead of object files could probably help a lot
also. I might try to set it up
Hello, Brooks.
You wrote 10 апреля 2013 г., 18:50:04:
BD The key is to pass the --sysroot option to the compiler. I've got a not
BD quite finished (mostly due to a complete lack of documentation) set of
BD patches to Makefile.inc1 to do this:
BD
Hello, Brooks.
You wrote 10 апреля 2013 г., 18:50:04:
BD The key is to pass the --sysroot option to the compiler. I've got a not
BD quite finished (mostly due to a complete lack of documentation) set of
BD patches to Makefile.inc1 to do this:
BD
How do your tests work? Do you examine PTEs directly to check for superpages
or are you relying on the vm.pmap.pde sysctls?
the later.
anyway - algorithm described on list - that heuristics detects consecutive
page access doesn't really help the urgent case - RANDOM access to large
amount
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
How do your tests work? Do you examine PTEs directly to check for
superpages
or are you relying on the vm.pmap.pde sysctls?
the later.
anyway - algorithm described on list - that heuristics detects consecutive
page access doesn't really help the
On 4/10/13 11:42 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
How do your tests work? Do you examine PTEs directly to check for
superpages
or are you relying on the vm.pmap.pde sysctls?
the later.
anyway - algorithm described on list - that heuristics detects
On 4/10/2013 9:43 AM, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
The last I heard, LTO on the kernel required something like 16 GB of RAM and
produced a not-quite-working image.
Jon
I upgraded my system with 32Gb for a reason.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
How do your tests work? Do you examine PTEs directly to check for
superpages
or are you relying on the vm.pmap.pde sysctls?
the later.
anyway - algorithm described on list - that heuristics detects
Like all performance items (especially VM), it depends on the hardware and
the load. On systems with small TLBs it helps more than with large TLBs. With
software that needs access to lots of different areas the TLB gets more traffic
so large ones help more. The answer for your firefox browser
On 4/10/13 1:09 PM, Andrew Duane wrote:
Like all performance items (especially VM), it depends on the hardware and
the load. On systems with small TLBs it helps more than with large TLBs. With software
that needs access to lots of different areas the TLB gets more traffic so large ones help
On 10 April 2013 13:06, Joshua Isom jri...@gmail.com wrote:
I upgraded my system with 32Gb for a reason.
Yes, yes you did.
TO force me to fix ath(4) and busdma. ;-)
Adrian
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
16 matches
Mail list logo
