Hi,
I want to encrypt some disk on my server with Zfs encryption property but it is
not available.
Are there anybody have got an experience about this?
[url]http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1448/gkkih.html#scrolltoc[/url]
Le 03/09/2013 14:14, Emre Çamalan a écrit :
Hi,
I want to encrypt some disk on my server with Zfs encryption property but it
is not available.
That would require ZFS v30. As far as I am aware Oracle has not
released the code under CDDL.
From http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=30036
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
against
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Florent Peterschmitt
flor...@peterschmitt.fr wrote:
Le 03/09/2013 14:14, Emre Çamalan a écrit :
Hi,
I want to encrypt some disk on my server with Zfs encryption property but it
is not available.
That would require ZFS v30. As far as I am aware Oracle has not
Le 03/09/2013 16:53, Alan Somers a écrit :
GELI is full-disk encryption. It's far superior to ZFS encryption.
Yup, but is there a possibility to encrypt a ZFS volume (not a whole
pool) with a separate GELI partition?
Also, in-ZFS encryption would be a nice thing if it could work like an
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Florent Peterschmitt
flor...@peterschmitt.fr wrote:
Le 03/09/2013 16:53, Alan Somers a écrit :
GELI is full-disk encryption. It's far superior to ZFS encryption.
Yup, but is there a possibility to encrypt a ZFS volume (not a whole
pool) with a separate GELI
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
see
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 12:40:15 pm Ivan Voras wrote:
On 28 August 2013 18:12, Gary Jennejohn gljennj...@googlemail.com wrote:
So, if I understand this correctly, a normal desktop user won't
notice any real change, except that buildworld might get faster,
and big servers will
On Friday, August 23, 2013 9:23:51 am Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
Hello!
I am using FreeBSD-9-STABLE on the following hardware:
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 24 CPUs
FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 6 core(s) x 2 SMT threads
So I have 2 physical CPUs with 6 core each.
# cpuset
Does anyone know if work on booting FreeBSD on modern Apple hardware
was ever completed? I have looked on the wiki, forums, and email archives
but I don't see anything definitive.
I would like to have a GPT partitioned disk with a freebsd-boot, freebsd-swap,
and multiple freebsd-ufs partitions
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:10:32PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
help further it.
Just checking to see how widely its been tested,
I've
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé oliv...@cochard.mewrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:24:26PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:10:32PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I would
14 matches
Mail list logo
