* Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011208 19:43] wrote:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Yes, but afaik without a way to differenciate between two opens. Being
able to notice whether a file is being operated on via which open is the
important part.
This would probably
for cancellation
(and other things) before returning to the threads interrupted
context.
No way to work around this? Shouldn't the thread exit library
know which stack exactly to clean up even in the context of a
signal handler?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011204 11:45] wrote:
* Dan Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011204 06:26] wrote:
There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads
whose contexts are not saved as a result of a signal interrupt
(ctxtype != CTX_UC). You shouldn't test
* Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011204 12:32] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Dan Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011204 06:26] wrote:
There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads
whose contexts are not saved as a result of a signal interrupt
(ctxtype != CTX_UC
to take a shot at porting it though, let us know
when you're done.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
http://www.morons.org
with the EXT2FS filesystem.
This is pretty much how they all work, on netbsd the LFS filesystem
has its own suite of seperate utilities as well. Don't be discouraged,
get hacking! :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start
* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011211 00:48] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
[ ... Hiten wants someone to GPLify FreeBSD ... ]
I'm glad you took the time to read the marketting literature.
The problem is that porting it is going to be a bit more complicated
than just dumping
-cancelflags PTHREAD_CANCEL_ASYNCHRONOUS) != 0))
+ cfl = curthread-cancelflags;
+ cfl = (PTHREAD_CANCEL_ASYNCHRONOUS|PTHREAD_AT_CANCEL_POINT);
+ if (cfl != 0)
pthread_testcancel();
/*
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL
* void [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011213 11:00] wrote:
Has anyone brought this code to the attention of the NetBSD people?
I imagine that they would be interested. If not, I will forward it
along myself, as soon as I determine the appropriate list. (List
recommendations from the dual citizens here
making the
UIO as you go, making the additional copy is just stupid.
It should be trivial to convert the routine and I strongly suggest
doing so.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring
on.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
http://www.morons.org/rants/gpl-harmful.php3
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
freebsd install and do a make world?
The point is we can do this dynamically, in fact we don't even need
to teach the linker how to do it, we can do it via the startup
scripts by checking a sysctl and providing the subdir to ldconfig.
:)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why
kern.ipc.shmseg: 1024
kern.ipc.shmall: 31251
kern.ipc.shm_use_phys: 1 - This wires the mem right?
Yes postgres shows to be 119M via top, but is this mem wired?
As long as you set the sysctl before starting postgresql, then
yes.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking
that I was seeing did
not involve VLAN tags.
You're probably incorrect, it doesn't matter if vlan tags are active
or not, it's most likely wheather or not the firmware is being asked
to handle them at all.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using
need fsck: for example, if VXFS crashes at a particularly
bad moment, it will require you to do fsck -o full which is as slow
as the fsck on traditional UFS.
Yeah, but that's not mentioned in the whitepaper! :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software
assume it's
PEBKAC.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
http://www.morons.org/rants/gpl-harmful.php3
To Unsubscribe: send
://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSD/fsstress-1.00.tgz
ports/regression ?
This would be really nifty, it could be a depot for various test
programs, unless of course we want it to be in src/ ?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking
* Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011221 15:11] wrote:
Hi,
One of my tasks is to add oplock support to FreeBSD so that we (Panasas)
can allow correct caching of files by Windows clients in the presence of
NFS clients using the same files.
We have a preliminary implementation, based
the problem is.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductable donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
* Wayne Pascoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011222 17:13] wrote:
Chad David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The issue that I am having is detecting valid filesystems to do
further checks on. I am only interested in checking local filesystems
such as UFS.
Check for the MNT_LOCAL flag in f_flags.
for you,
or let me know if I can.
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductable donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org
stack trace from this
crash please?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated
.
Problem seems to be in the vm section of the kernel.
I the most recent backtrace would be the most helpful, so would
program source, please provide it directly, I don't have time
to search the archives, remeber who is asking for help, eh? :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking
print:
*mp, *sp, *p, *((struct vnode *)fp-f_data)
Can you tell me what filesystem this is over? Do you have
any special tunables set in your kernel? Anything you can
divulge about how this program operates?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software
* Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011227 15:11] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
ok
0xffbee000-0xffbeefff irq 11 at device 13.0 on pci0
The fact that your card doesn't have a memory map concerns me that
it's not what we're expecting. Where is the vendor's website?
Can you ask them for more info?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece
)
Arch = $(shell arch)
cc .. -DArch .
and inside the program
#ifdef i686
But arch doesn't exist on FreeBSD.
Isn't this somewhat trivial?
ARCH=i686
CFLAGS+=-D${ARCH}
?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology
socket *)fp-f_data;
TAILQ_REMOVE(so-so_aiojobq, aiocbe, list);
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductable donations
;
/*
* A kludge for Kensington device!
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480-4684
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
be automated[1], perhaps by setting
the boot partition to the swap partition and setting it up temporarily
as a ufs filesystem and then... oh... well...
[1] http://www.jerkcity.com/jerkcity1426.html
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480-4684
* Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031201 00:27] wrote:
At 00:18 01/12/2003 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Then type these commands into the loader:
unload kernel
load /ikernel
load -t mfs_root /mfsroot
set vfs.root.mountfrom
boot ^^
Surely that should
How do I get __thread to work for me?
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread-Local.html
it seems the assembler chokes on it?
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480-4684
___
[EMAIL
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 02:47] wrote:
How do I get __thread to work for me?
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread-Local.html
it seems the assembler chokes on it?
Taking this code:
#include stdio.h
__thread int x;
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
printf(duh
* Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 12:08] wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 02:47] wrote:
How do I get __thread to work for me?
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread-Local.html
it seems the assembler
* Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 14:31] wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 12:08] wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031221 02:47] wrote:
How do I get
= ENOTCONN;
- goto done;
- }
if (uap-offset 0) {
error = EINVAL;
goto done;
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480-4684
___
[EMAIL
not to? The one reason I
figured was that sometimes blocking sigpipe can be hairy inside
libraries. Now that we can selectively disable SIGPIPE using
the setsockopt using Apple's code this is less of an issue.
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL
of an issue.
Yes, I think checking for SS_CATSENDMORE (and returning EPIPE) prior to
checking SS_ISCONNECTED (and returning ENOTCONN as it does now) is the right
thing to do.
Last question (I hope)... :)
Why not call sosend?
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email
Is there a way to turn a .so into a .o? I would like to link
something statically, and I'm doing a bunch of work on the
symbol table and would like to avoid a mess with using ar(1).
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480-4684
after I combine the object files.
Any hints?
--
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 408-480-4684
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
* Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040110 03:17] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm having a hell of a time doing this so I can produce a static
.o or .a with most of the symbols stripped. Two problems seem to be
that even if I use ld -r -o main.o obj1.o obj2.c
* Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040113 15:41] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
It will refuse to strip symbols if:
foo.o:func1() references bar.o:func2().
But I need it to.
I suppose there are good reasons why you
cannot compile everything into a single
.o file for distribution
* Andrew R. Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020805 09:15] wrote:
On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
:Can anyone point out or provide me with a suite to regression test
:sysv_ipc, specifically semaphores, message queues and shared memory?
:
:I'm working on SMP locking those subsystems
that did the sem_init?
Or am I going to have to do some nastyness to record the memory
location where the semaphore is and track that page's allocation?
little help here... :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking
* Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020918 18:40] wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Ok, any of you guys have a copy of the standards documents that
describe the sem_* API?
I have a question...
What are the semantics of the sem_init when pshared is set to true
have a problem with it unless it's not necessary,
I'll see if I can get access to solaris to figure out wth they
do. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020920 14:46] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 09:37:21PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
libfetch seems to have a bug such that if a disconnect happens at
a particular point it spins in a tight loop.
I tracked it down to this fix:
I'm still seeing
* Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021114 15:42] wrote:
Please see earlier threads on hackers@ about bloat in libc and dynamic
linking of /[s]bin. Tim Kientzle submitted a patch that breaks exit's
dependency on malloc which saves space in the programs that don't
otherwise use malloc.
I don't
(finally!).
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body
* Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021115 12:17] wrote:
:Will the knobs allow one to link /bin and /sbin against full blown
:libc? That would be nice as we can then start using pam and user
:management in / with dynamic modules (finally!).
:
:--
:-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED
case to uma_zalloc, but who knows...
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd
the refcount on the fdesc is still 0 we leave it
alone and leak lock structures.
p1 exits
Does this make sense as a problem area? I think we should only
allow filedesc sharing if RFTHREAD is set. RFTHREAD seems to get
it right because of the peers/leader mechanism.
thanks,
--
-Alfred
to set either RFPROC or RFTHREAD.
Yes, the manpage is out of date. What the hell is a sigact anyhow?
Can someone please fixup the manpage? :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years
.
thank you,
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body
I'm asking is...
Can anyone state ahead of time why they would object to this?
(please reply publically)
Who will test it?
(privately plz)
Thanks!
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software
.
I think you want fstatfs(2).
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductable donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org
* Leo Bicknell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020110 12:26] wrote:
I have a few machines configured for serial consoles (my first),
and have found an oddity.
Basically I did the -P boot.config thing, and the 'set
console=comconsole' in loader.rc. This works fine. I then run a
getty on the
, before I dig in code to patch/fix it. :-)
No dammit, tell your stupid serial console device thingy to ignore
carrier detection :P
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years
* Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020113 16:20] wrote:
the threads package doesn't do file IO asynchronoulsy
in fact there ahve been several people threatenning to use AIO
to make the threads package to that asychronously too.
;)
SIGFAULT as well. :)
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
* Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020116 10:40] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, K S Sreeram wrote:
Hi
My name is K.S.Sreeram, and i am very much interested in contributing to
the
[...]
Sounds like you are ideally suited to this:-)
here are some starting tips.
Tip 1:
* Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020116 10:51] wrote:
:
:In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon wri
:tes:
:Ok, cool. I'll get the commit gears started for the
:first part of the patch.
:
:FYI, I was able to reproduce this and confirm that the first part
:of your patch
* Robert Thoelen III [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020116 11:29] wrote:
Sorry about the previous empty post. I am trying
create a filesystem on a server running FreeBSD at
work. I would like to create a floppy that would
mount the filesystem by NFS. This way, on any given
machine at work, I could
* David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020116 14:30] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:18:25PM -0800, Josef Grosch wrote:
I have a mysql database that seems slow and when looking at it in top it
always seems to be in a state of biord
What the heck is biord I can't find this anywere
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductable donations
CPUs in it so this is a potential concern.
--
Any statement of the form X is the one, true Y is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start
* Thierry Herbelot [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020123 14:24] wrote:
Hello,
I've got an SCSI CD-Writer, which only gives errors when I try to use
cd-record (see full log at the end of the message)
As the problem is identical on a fresh 4.4-Rel (with cd-record installed
from the CD as a binary
* Are Bryne [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020123 21:13] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get PostgreSQL 7.1.3 compiled on a FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE
system (that will hopefully be upgraded in not too long, just not yet :).
I am having problems with the linker not supporting -export-dynamic, and
the
by open) on a file, the kernel must allocate vnode
corresponding to that file right? Assuming the file is not memory-mapped
by any other process, would the vnode still have a valid v_object field?
If it is VMIO then yes.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece
, will
it crash and burn? Also are clusters allocated out of the VM_KMEM_SIZE or out
of remaining memory?
Most of the nmbclusters are borrowed from banned AOL users with too much
time on their hands.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using
* Luigi Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020201 00:25] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 04:59:31PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
You will get a factor of 6 (approximately) improvement in
throughput vs. overhead if you process packets to completion
at interrupt, and process writes to completion at
* Michal Mertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020203 08:17] wrote:
I wrote a simple program which does this:
gettimeofday
something (takes several seconds)
gettimeofday
print time elapsed
Several runs of the program take about the same time but the time
changes wildly when the executable is called
to get at it via the vfs lookup cache
entries hung off the vnode. Paul Saab showed me a delta that
did something nasty like this, but I've got no clue as to where
it is now.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking
the initial stack, the chance that gcc will have
auto-alignment added sounds to be about zero. You might as well go ahead
with your patch when you get a chance.
I agree, either way we should try to optimized the current situation,
especially if it seems to give a 2x perf boost!
--
-Alfred Perlstein
they watch for and try to fix this sort of thing?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductable donations for FreeBSD: http
* Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020205 12:28] wrote:
I've been forced to add -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 to critical code
in certain projects to get rid of the crap GCC adds to the assembly.
I don't mind if GCC aligns the stack for routines that actually need
it, but
* Henk Wevers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020207 11:58] wrote:
Hi,
Just to try the thing out i did put vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck to 1.
My active memory use was in 30 minutes 75 MB lower, and the io is
faster, the load is lower.
The OS is FreeBSD 4.5-REL with 1250MB ram on a PIII 733, it runs 30+
: version has today.
Would a 'C' hacker do :-)
Heh, I wish someone would add some extra regex and seperator type
stuff to our 'sh' that became available when running it under
another name or with a special flag...
any takers on that one? :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead
* M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020212 10:46] wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: * M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020212 10:35] wrote:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
* David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020212 14:33] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:23:31PM -0500, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: * M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020212 10:35] wrote:
Well, we
* Robert Withrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020217 08:13] wrote:
Hi:
I was wondering if there was anyone working on getting ClearCase working
on FreeBSD?
It seems that if we can get the Linux version of VmWare to run on FreeBSD
it should be possible to get the Linux version of ClearCase to run
problem is that most of the generic web servers available
(as well as most commercial ones) just suck for handling IO and
events. A well thought out design can give you quite a perf
boost without needing to stick the _entire_ thing into the kernel.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED
, any clues?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail
subclass;
u_int8_tprotocol;
u_int8_tconfig;
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations
* Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020219 00:12] wrote:
http://web.netapp.com/engineering/projects/raidv2/testing/global/
uh, yeah it's not my header.
Oh duh, sorry...
If you do that then you have to modify all the files including it
correspondingly. Will putting an extern C { ... }
* Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020219 01:06] wrote:
One potential problem is that 'make' on different platforms can differ
in many details.
Some of the features of BSD make that are used by the portmakefiles for
example are not supported by GNU make (which is used on Linux) GNU make
into another
process context via kernel threads, posix aio or kses.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http
to maintain source compatiblity with NetBSD
so let's come to some sort of agreement please? I can even
do the delta for NetBSD if it will be accepted.
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software
other.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
, which requires a lot
of math and memory operations.
--- with bzero ---
Linux$ time ./malloc_test
Could you explain what malloc_test actually does and/or share the
code?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start
, which requires a lot
of math and memory operations.
Also, which version of FreeBSD?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations
* Jan Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020307 08:12] wrote:
Something odd seems to be happening; I'd appreciate look here
suggestions. I suspect mmapped pages aren't being flushed but gawd alone
knows why.
Situation: vmware2, with a fake disk, files in the /external FS
(/external/vmware1/nt1.*).
associated
with one object. see src/sys/vm/vm_page.h
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020307 22:24] wrote:
If it were just the pcbhash, I think I'd go with a btree...
or to make Alfred happy... a skiplist... ;^).
Argh, someone hand me the firehose, Terry seems really thirsty...
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send
* Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020307 22:35] wrote:
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020307 22:24] wrote:
If it were just the pcbhash, I think I'd go with a btree...
or to make Alfred happy... a skiplist... ;^).
Argh, someone
* Farooq Mela [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020312 13:01] wrote:
Rather than the usual recv() to a fixed size buffer, write() to the
file descriptor, loop, etc. However when I try to do this recv gives
me back an EFAULT (bad address). Is there a limitation of the
architecture which does not allows
* Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020312 16:35] wrote:
Can someone tell me how I can detect if these functions are available
on a system at compile time? I cannot use an autoconf type of test,
and need to use a preprocessor macro type of test.
__FreeBSD__version.
-Alfred
To
* Farooq Mela [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020312 21:56] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Farooq Mela [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020312 13:01] wrote:
Rather than the usual recv() to a fixed size buffer, write() to the
file descriptor, loop, etc. However when I try to do this recv gives
me back
, though, given
the time at which i wrote the message :-)
Why should we hide the fact that you are on a brain dead archetecture?
:)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years
sharing for
allocation of data structures in smp.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
601 - 700 of 913 matches
Mail list logo
