it eventually
breaks.)
Get a better job. Skilled IT workers are rare enough that they
shouldn't need to put up with such crap, and shouldn't have any
trouble getting a new job when the crap starts flying.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
doing I/O,
and if you're already doing I/O as fast as you can there's no room for
improvement. On a machine with a slower CPU or a faster I/O system,
you'd see improvement.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
, not the old 486DX33 you have
lying in a corner.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...] That implies to me, at least, that after a certain
point the CPU is going to be the bottleneck.
More likely RAM bandwidth. Those 133 Mhz FSBs ought to help, though.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe
. Stuff on disk has to be read into memory, and this
is generally done by DMAing it off the disk, which locks the memroy
bus, then copying it out into userland. With an MFS you skip the first
part, unless MFS is stupider than I thought.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe
by the kernel make process.
Of course not. It's not part of the kernel. There's a duplicate of
this file in /usr/src/sys/netinet which need to be kept in synch.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
Robin Cutshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any ideas as to why it would take almost three times longer to build
on FreeBSD?
Yup: 4.x sucks at SMP. Try the comparison again with uniprocessor
kernels - I expect you'll see a much smaller difference.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
, my experience is that unless you're paying Sun significant
amounts of $$, their reaction to bug reports is to close their eyes,
hum real loud and hope they go away.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
other, you can also just specify that one file on the
command line.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ethod uses a
compile directory in /usr/src.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
, but it takes some
hand-holding.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
d segfault.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
of memory that's already mapped and you'll be fine, but
sometimes (when allocating beyond what was previously used) it won't.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Seebach) writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
Malloc() does not overcommit - the kernel does. Malloc() doesn't know
and doesn't care.
But it could still probably force the behavior.
Barring kernel changes, not easily, and only for single
allocated.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Kenneth Wayne Culver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 24 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Kenneth Wayne Culver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FreeBSD supports cardbus in -CURRENT, but I wouldn't expect it to ever
support cardbus in 4.x. If you are daring you can get -CURRENT, but from
what
"Daniel C. Sobral" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It doesn't work. The application killed by reason of insufficient
resources is not (necessarily) the one that causes the page fault
leading to that.
This is arguably a bug which needs to be fixed.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What about setrlimit(RLIMIMT_DATA)?
Yep, I'd forgotten about that. Malloc() will return NULL if you hit
your data size limit.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
it nevertheless does.
OK, doing a stat and checking the mtime should give you
the info at the expense of polling, I can't think of another way.
Won't help. You'll get the same mtime no matter whether the file is
actually written to disk or not.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
Anton Berezin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So is there a way, or is not?
No. If there was a way to tell it'd be a bug.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Peter Dufault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Won't help. You'll get the same mtime no matter whether the file is
actually written to disk or not.
No, the spec says: [...]
Oops, I was thinking "regular file with softupdates", not "mmapped
file" (note to self: get more sleep)
vmstat showing 100% busy and iostat showing 10% busy..
No, -vmstat and -iostat are showing 13 and 12 tps (transactions per
second), respectively. -iostat doesn't show a "busy percentage".
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
ons PNPBIOS' to your
kernel. If that doesn't solve your problem, we have a bug.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
--- 1,7
! three
! ducks
! swim
! in
! a
little
! pond
des@flood ~% diff -u old new
--- old Sun Mar 11 03:07:31 2001
+++ new Sun Mar 11 03:08:08 2001
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-the
+three
+ducks
+swim
+in
+a
little
-horse
-jumped
-over
-the
-fence
+pond
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was at the time - socketpair(2) had totally slipped my mind ;)
Umm, you want pipe(2), not socketpair(2).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" i
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 04:53:34PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was at the time - socketpair(2) had totally slipped my mind ;)
Umm, you want pipe(2), not socketpair(2).
Actually, I want
way around, actually (we increased KVM space from 256 MB to
1 GB - not 2 GB as you claim). And the problem with legacy BSDI
binaries (newer ones don't have this problem) was fixed a long time
ago, in 3.0 (before 3.0-RELEASE).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
and committing them.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You could take a look at www.FreeBSD.org/handbook/kerneldebug.html
and provide a bit more details about that crash; at the very least,
a 'where' or 'bt' would be useful.
That, and a dmesg, or at least uname -a.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
|## 2446
22 |## 500
23 |## 326
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*
* Copyright (c) 2001 ThinkSec AS. All rights reserved.
*
* $ThinkSec$
*/
#include err.h
#include time.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
static int accepted
and libfetch, and
it seems like there's some stub code that hasn't been flushed out
completely. Anyone know of any plans to finish this up?
Feel free to send patches :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
of the instruction which caused
this exception, right ?
Possibly. I'm not very familiar with the FPU.
3. If yes, how do I translate this 48 bit address in a linear address
which gdb can understand ?
You don't. FreeBSD uses a flat address space, you can disregard the
segment descriptor.
DES
--
Dag-Erling
-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
no
longer root.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
a message when it omits printing an opaque variable.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a good reason why sysctl(8) won't display _any_ output for
opaque MIB entries named as arguments?
Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an
option to make it display
Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an
option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't
print a message when it omits printing an opaque
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's?
At least on ref5 as of this very moment..
Yes, because '-a' means 'show all non-opaque' and 'hw' is ignored.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:52:15PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's?
Yes, because '-a' means 'show all non-opaque' and 'hw' is ignored.
OK, so I
- you'd
see the kernel stack getting smashed, not an FPU exception.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
intuitive to me and Peter at
least. :-)
Maybe so, but I've always thought -A and -X were *counter*intuitive,
and the current behaviour of 'sysctl foo' where foo is the name of an
opaque variable is, to say the least, surprising. Adding the -x
option makes it slightly less so.
DES
--
Dag-Erling
Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSD/tuning.html
In the kernel config tuning section, you've misspelt NSFBUFS as
NFSBUFS, which doesn't exist.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Every time I tease my housemate's cat with a laser pointer, I am
violating a US patent. (No, really.)
I need to get a laser pointer...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
Kevin Way [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just ordered a spare machine a few days ago. I'll install
-CURRENT on it, and start the integration. I've been
needing something to keep myself out of trouble.
That's our new slogan: FreeBSD - keeping kids off the street
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Urban Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another strange thing is that when I try to use tcpdump it doesn´t show all
packets. No packets are dropped by kernel but tcpdump have received
packets but don´t show them. Could this in some way be related.
Use the -n option.
DES
--
Dag-Erling
. They are set by the submitter
and rarely if ever changed by committers, and are usually far more
indicative of the submitter's state of mind than of the PR's
importance.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body
it back on. If you're not happy with that, put 'hw.ata.wc=0'
in your /boot/loader.conf and they'll be off after the next reboot.
Or get real disks.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body
or fold.
Talk about bait-and-switch! It's for this reason, by the way, that
the LGPL has been renamed from Library GPL to Lesser GPL.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
David Preece [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is anyone close enough to drive round and have a quiet word?
Netiquette for instance. Or asking for trouble.
Or lookity shiny new baseball bat?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
effectively got a
{BSD,MIT,Apache} license (except for a few details about attributions
and the naming of derivative software), and you might as well make the
change in name as well as in function.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Mike's patch is a style cleanup with no functional impact except
plugging a memory leak, I feel it's better to commit it first, and
merge in Alexey's patch later, after it's been reviewed by this forum.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
at the kernel level, and as others have stated before in
a different context, driver source does not constitute adequate
documentation. It helps, but it's neither sufficient nor necessary.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
.
A 3.x driver *could* be ported forward to 4.x and 5.x, but the
required changes are not trivial (newbus, SMPng...) and you'd still
need sample boards for testing and debugging, and docs for reference
when you don't understand what the existing driver is trying to do.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
'. You'll be surprised...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
of nasty bugs and problems.
There was one in FreeBSD too. It's been fixed; accept(2) will return
-1 and set errno to ECONNABORTED, which you'd know if you'd RTFM.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
queue.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
. The packet flows
directly from one layer2 input routine directly to the opposing
layer2 output routine without traversing the IP layer.
And more importantly, without traversing ipfw or ipfilter. In other
words, don't use this on a firewall.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
to NetBSD native system call.
What is the difference between PEACE and WINE?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
that, the only ugliness is
the need to fondle syscons' privates.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Marc Tardif [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How can I find the source to specific functions in /usr/src/sys?
URL:http://lxr.linux.no/freebsd/source
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" i
has paid off :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
expect 4.2 will as well.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
---
#0 0xc0132df8 in boot ()
(kgdb) where
#0 0xc0132df8 in boot ()
Cannot access memory at address 0xce51d9b8.
(kgdb)
This probably means the panic was in a KLD.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
somewhere?).
You might want to look at src/sys/i386/isa/if_rdp.c instead.
And yes, dl is available, though there's a header file called if_dl.h;
if your driver needs its own header file, call it if_dlreg.h.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
FengYue [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 3 Oct 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
- panic messages:
- ---
- Where are the panic messages?
Unfortunately, there is no panic messages. I compiled the kernel with
-g (without DDB), and set the dumpdev in rc.conf. Did I do anything
wrong
Will someone please inform the gcc developers of the last decade's
advances in C standardization? Yes, Virginia, ISO C (it's not ISO C
any more, and hasn't been since 1989) does support 'long long' and the
'll' format.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
) on December 16th,
1999, but gcc still seems to live in 1989-land.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
James Housley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe a correct and true statement is "FreeBSD is a direct decendant
of Unix(TM). Based on the BSD sources"
I don't think there's all that much left of the original BSD
sources... at least not in the kernel.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgra
(2)
returned 2, which is ENOENT, i.e. the file didn't exist). If it
succeeded, the value returned is the result (a file descriptor in
open(2)'s case).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" i
Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# load -t md /filesystemfile
Shouldn't that be 'load -t md_root'?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ch a state?
It has several, depending on the type of I/O the process is waiting
for: biord (waiting for a read operation to complete), biowr (waiting
for a write operation to complete), select (waiting for descriptors to
become readable / writable), etc.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
void [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any reason top couldn't add these up and report a %iowait
like Solaris'?
Yes. It would conceal valuable information. Do the adding up in your
head.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Jessem.
Amazing what people will do to evade killfiles. Plonk.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
r messages, with timestamps, to various log
files located in /var/log (most prominently /var/log/messages) as
specified in /etc/syslogd.conf.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
this case, the hype
that an Internet year is only a few weeks of wallclock time.
I'm sure there must be some meaning to what you write, but it keeps
eluding me.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
an address to the
function. I don't get it... What address? I want it to allocate memory
for me and tell me its address. How am I supposed to know what address
is available???
Did you even read the man page?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Brandon Fosdick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
"Recently"? nslookup has been officially deprecated for about a year
and a half, I believe.
Will a replacement be added to the base distro? When?
1) nslookup is still in the base FreeBSD distribution, and will
"G. Adam Stanislav" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 04:32:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Did you even read the man page?
Many times, actually. And on different days, too. :)
No, you didn't. You probably read the first line, then your eyes
glazed over and y
"G. Adam Stanislav" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 06:11:06PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
The second and third sentences of the second paragraph (the one that
starts on line 23), as well as the entire eighth paragraph (that
starts on line 45), address the
(or was it /dev/null?)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remy Nonnenmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I may think using this solution if it remains portable between
Unixes.
It's perfectly portable, with one small variation - on BSD systems,
you pass -1 instead of a file descriptor, while on SysV
if a user logged on?
I'm pretty unsure about this..
Why don't you tell us what you want to do, instead of how you think it
must be done?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
is called to do its dance..
kern.* is not the right place for this. It should go in user.*, unless
that is reserved for userland, in which case a subtree of kern.* is
probably the Right Thing.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
s/sysctl.h.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
(724 in your case -
closest primes are 719 and 727), create that many bucket directories,
and place each user in bucket ID mod K.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
an odd (and
preferably prime) stripe size on RAIDs to (amongst other reasons)
avoid having all the superblock backups end up on the same disk.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" i
ta0-master: ata_command: identify failed
ad2: 39082MB Maxtor 54098U8 [79406/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA66
snip
I bet your CD-ROM is incorrectly configured as master.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
Netscape and StarOffice at the same time, 128MB
isn't enough. Sigh.
Avoid StarOffice like the plague. It's neat, but it leaks like a
sieve, and barely crawls along on my 450 MHz K6-2.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubs
ctly sets cpu_vendor to "ConnectixCPU"
(rather than e.g. "GenuineIntel" or "AuthenticAMD") you can just check
against that. It's declared in machine/md_var.h.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
cpu_is_vpc;
#endif
and not break anyone's heart?
No. Check cpu_vendor at probe/attach time and set a flag in the
interface's softc that indicates that it needs to be treated as a VPC
emulated interface.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
can write a program
exactly like another, if you can prove you never saw the other
program. If you saw the similar program you are dirty.
ATT (or Novell, don't remember if it was before or after the sale of
USL) tried to use that argument against UCB. It was rejected.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgra
if the directory exists; make sure to differentiate between
"somebody already holds the lock" and "the lock can't be created due
to permission errors or some other problem" by examining $!)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Volker Stolz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:35:08PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
What are you guys smoking?
*shrug* Can you spell "event-driven"? There are ways to do things much
more elegantly today (see all the references to kevent()).
I cho
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:44:34PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Volker Stolz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:35:08PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
What are you guys smoking?
*shrug* Can you spell "event-d
and 3.2-RELEASE CD
sets had the "waiter beastie" graphic (the one on 3.1 had no tail!),
but by 3.3 WC had reverted to Hosokawa-san's "beastie coming out of a
CD" artwork.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
told me to store these limits (above) in
a etc/sysctl.conf file but when I went to etc that
file wasn't in there .. do I have to newly create the
file or should it already be there?
'man sysctl.conf'
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
"Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Penguin mascot has enough advantages over Chuck already !
Then why do I get this urge to go bowling every time I see Tux?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
101 - 200 of 436 matches
Mail list logo
