wanna.
I have a user that belong to shell shell login classes, but he is not
disconnected after 1 minute of idle time?
Not all of the login class items work the way they are supposed to. You
should probably look at 'idled' in the ports collection.
Good luck,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send
I'm confused about this script. How does it differ from 'apropos'?
Feeling a little dense,
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter
what it does.
-- Will Rogers
not looked at the motd, because if they had they
wouldn't need the script.
Honestly, while this is one of those things that sounds good when
you first start talking about it, in practice I don't see what we gain
from it.
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we
to be able to put some of these !*#@$* Cobalt Raqs we
have round here to a wholesome purpose. :) Of course doing the install
would be a lot of fun with no floppy disk
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep
On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Doug wrote:
I'd just like to offer a hearty hi-ho for a MIPS version of
freebsd. I'd love to be able to put some of these !*#@$* Cobalt Raqs we
have round here to a wholesome purpose. :) Of course doing the install
would
t with anything that had
known exploits.
HTH,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Doug wrote:
In my continuing efforts to get this freebsd box into shape for
web hosting at my company (where it relies exclusively on NFS for
retrieving customer data) I've been making progress thanks to some recent
commits by Peter. Now I can run the heavy duty NFS
.
HTH,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
that _start() is the culprit. (Please everyone, stop laughing,
thanks. :)
Comments or suggestions welcome.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Ladavac Marino wrote:
I don't know if your diagnosis was in jest,
Yes it was, but thank you for asking. :) I should have known
better than to attempt subtle humor at the end of a long, tiring day.
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run
osix in this respect. Someone more familiar with the spec than I could
tell you for sure, however I can say with relative security that subshell
processes should not taint parent shell variables.
Exercising my firm grasp of the obvious,
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the peo
to a regular file, and that also worked like a charm. After
:turning syslog style logging back on, it locked up cold, with a very
:similar traceback.
:
: If anyone wants to work on this, let me know.
:
:Doug
Are you syslogging to the console by any chance?
Here is syslog.conf
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
After pounding on this some more with today's -current (prior to
the MNT_ASYNC flag change) I got a lot more lockups that looked like
this:
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Doug wrote:
Ok, got another hang in "siobi" state (this
e current ident options all suck, so it
would be nice to have a freebsd version that we know will work, and once
we have that then people won't need the port, but they can install it if
they want to."
Frankly I don't see why we're still discussing this, but then
again, I do.
Ho
it, the linux box had no free cpu and a load average of
8. :) I also (finally) got the approval to install freebsd on the fourth
box (there are already two linux machines up) so A) I'm making progress in
the office, and B) I should have a chance to pound on the syslog stuff
tomorrow.
Happy,
Doug
Soaking it in,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
output (like boot/bios
messages, etc.) to a serial console. It comes with a built in Etherexpress
Pro 100+ as well.
I have an Asus P2B at home that I've run my Celeron 300A
overclocked to 450 since the first of the year with no problems (and BIG
fans).
HTH,
Doug
--
On account of being
you reach a point of stability? Assuming you have enough physical ram you
could do 15k mbufs on -Stable without a problem. Check LINT for the
nmbclusters option if you need help with it.
Good luck,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hacke
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 10:59:26 MST, Doug wrote:
No answer on -current, any help appreciated.
We're probably all sitting here thinking "I'm sure this was asked and
answered recently. He can read his CURRENT mail like the rest of us."
I have i
Vincent Poy wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Doug wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Vincent Poy wrote:
Greetings everyone,
What are the current good motherboards for FreeBSD for the pentium
II and III? I know on the Pentium, it was the ASUS board but for the
PII/PIII
if the error resurfaces.
Thanks,
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter
what it does.
-- Will Rogers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubs
it is on wcarchive, so I just pulled down all the bits
and installed it the "hard" way, however I know I'm going to run into
trouble down the road when ports start looking for the X stuff in
/var/db/pkg.
Any comments or suggestions welcome,
Doug
--
On account of being a democra
t properly registering the X install. If the port depending on the
existence of /var/db/pkg/X* is actually an error I'll report what I find to
the -ports list.
Thanks,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
a misconception; this isn't actually a sysinstall
problem.
Okey dokey. As long as y'all are aware of it I'm happy, I just
hadn't seen it mentioned.
Thanks for clarifying,
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep
uot;Hmmm.. I
wasn't aware of that, I'll have to pass that on." So perhaps there is
hope, but I'm still not holding my breath.
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter
what it does.
this a try.
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter
what it does.
-- Will Rogers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" i
multiple patterns and it never
occured to me that anyone would want to do this.
Ah, well, if the world were limited to just what I could imagine,
how boring would that be? The more complete the feature set, the better
off we are for my money.
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, James Howard wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Doug wrote:
Ah, well, if the world were limited to just what I could imagine,
how boring would that be? The more complete the feature set, the better
off we are for my money.
You misinterpretted, I didn't know you
of the code, I
am one, have been for years, and deploy it in many different environments
(including natd, basic security, etc.). These would be very welcome
additions assuming that the performance hit is negligible.
Thanks,
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we
format back when I was playing around with it.
This is not something to be tampered with lightly.
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter
what it does.
-- Will Rogers
because the IANA specifies them that way. I think that they
try to keep both UDP and TCP ports the same, "just in case". There
might be a better explanation in rfc1700 (assigned numbers)
Nope, that is the official reason. Cheesy-poofs for you. :)
Doug
To Unsubscribe:
, but IIRC it boils down to dealing
properly with an address of 255.255.255.255. Whoever it was that mentioned
it recently on this list clearly had the right idea.
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years,
to
:place this kind of information in the man page that you suggest below? As
:often as /etc/services gets read, do we really want to bloat it with
:non-functional information?
:...
:Doug
I kinda like the idea of putting the RFC numbers in comments in
/etc/services. It makes
entries for /etc/services that make more sense than the
defaults, especially for the ports 1023.
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter
what it does.
-- Will Rogers
reading of the man pages and other documentation, and a lot of
experimentation. Any comments or suggestions for improvements would be
welcome.
Thanks,
Doug
amd.conf:
[ global ]
map_type = file
search_path =/etc
auto_dir = /usr/amd/realmounts
is that there are so
MANY options, and my knowledged about potential side effects is very
limited.
Thanks for your response,
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter
what it does
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 15:05:14 MST, Doug wrote:
I still haven't heard anyone answer the two key (IMO) questions.
Your questions are easier answered in reverse order:
and how do you justify the additional cost to parse the file for every
single system call
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 15:10:18 MST, Doug wrote:
On some of the machines I administer I have some custom entries for
/etc/services that make more sense than the defaults, especially for
the ports 1023.
Would you need these entries if inetd let you specify port
Hrrmmm... I'm not sure where the concern about loopback stuff
comes from. Does amd use the loopback interface to communicate with
anything?
Thanks,
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years
appreciate the
confirmation. We have a pretty good relationship with the vendor so I'll
take that route first.
Thanks,
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter
wh
ss doesn't want to mess with it.
Thanks,
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter
what it does.
-- Will Rogers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with &q
.)
But seriously folks, this kind of thing happens all the time in
the computer business. The best way to handle it is to keep smiling and
talk to the ones who will listen, and report accurately. The word is
getting out slowly.
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is kinda different from what the original poster received.
Keep badgering!
But ONLY if you ARE willing to pay for it if they make one. We
don't need a repeat of the CDE debacle.
Doug
Hi John,
Thank you for the interest in our
these instructions and both have been successful. I
cobbled together the information from various posts to the lists over the
last year and my experience doing the two upgrades. Some of the
recommendations may seem overly paranoid, but please keep the target
audience in mind.
TIA,
Doug
http://home.san.rr.com
. The freebsd machines are NFS clients to the sun servers doing
most of the web processing. Overall performance on the reads seems to be
best with nfs v3 over udp, which is what I'm using now. All of the web
server directories are soft mounted directly, with no amd currently in use.
thanks,
Doug
is what I'm using now. All of the web
:server directories are soft mounted directly, with no amd currently in use.
:
:thanks,
:
:Doug
Well, NFS buffers are usually sent over the network the moment they
are full. If you are not running any nfsiod's
I should have mentioned, I
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Doug wrote:
Matthew Dillon wrote:
: So, the big question is whether there is anything we can tune to speed up
:the writes. The freebsd machines are NFS clients to the sun servers doing
:most of the web processing. Overall
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, the 'boolean' option is essentially undocumented in the
login.conf man page. It's mentioned once, but there is no example of how
it works or the fact that the @ sign is the symbol for it. The info is in
login_cap(3
on the global internet are letters, numbers and the
dash character, "-". Underscores are not valid, at all, period. I realize
that the RFC's don't seem to be clear on this point, however you can rest
assured that such is the case.
Good luck,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
What do I know; I was just the first chair of the domain name working group
in the IETF so many years ago before it got fashionable.
Well, things change. :)
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government f
Tony Finch wrote:
Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
[lost attribution]
That IS a violation of the standard, since A records are not valid
for hosts in in-addr.arpa.
And next I suppose you'll tell me that PTR records are not valid
outsize of the IN-ADDR.ARPA
ultra-paranoid environment you could set an option that requires that the
uid matchup is for the actual person, similar to the way an ssh public
key/private key pair works.
Hope this is useful,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in th
is fundamentally different in BIND 8.2.x. This is not to
say that fixing this now is not a good thing, just that it's not worth a
whole LOT of time since things will be changing whenever the new BIND is
imported.
HTH,
Doug
--
"My mama told me, my mama said, 'don't cry.' 'She said you're too young
answer to the question in your subject line, I would say "More so than
they are now." Comments and suggestions are welcome, preferably accompanied
by unified diffs. :)
Good luck with your project,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
seem to remember it being one of those "religious"
issues...
3. Anything else I should be looking at in this phase of the game?
Thanks,
Doug
--- /etc/rc Thu Aug 26 21:02:19 1999
+++ rc Thu Aug 26 22:57:06 1999
@@ -8,24 +8,25 @@
# and the console is the controlling terminal.
to a
different value, and I couldn't even C-A-D to reboot clean, I had to do a
soft reset.
Obviously this is a "... well don't do that" case, but I'm not sure it
should be fatal. Hopefully this is of use to someone.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with &q
Chris Costello wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999, Doug wrote:
Greetings,
As previously discussed, here is a first draft of the rc* script mods. I
consider the first step in this process to be Jordan's cleanup of the
variable syntax. This is step 2, which most notably converts test's
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999, Doug wrote:
2. value ) instead of value) for case statements
Why? What's wrong with `value)'?
Nothing functionally, but I find case statements much easier to read with
the extra whitespace.
Would
Doug wrote:
Greetings,
As previously discussed, here is a first draft of the rc* script mods. I
consider the first step in this process to be Jordan's cleanup of the
variable syntax. This is step 2, which most notably converts test's dealing
with variables to case wherever
concerned about getting _my_ way on a lot of these things, so long as we
get a style that is consistent and that everyone can live with.
Doug--- /usr/src/etc/rc Thu Aug 26 20:56:36 1999
+++ rc Fri Aug 27 09:52:39 1999
@@ -8,24 +8,25 @@
# and the console is the controllin
Nik Clayton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 11:23:06AM -0700, Doug wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Nate Williams wrote:
Sentences are supposed to have two spaces before you start the next
sentence.
Well, that was definitely the old typographical convention, but in
the digital
Matthew Dillon wrote:
I guess they don't teach manual typewriting classes any more :-)
Actually I took that class in Jr. High School, way back in '77. It was the
only good advice my Jr. High guidance counselor gave me.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
I see this as step 3. of the project, and will go ahead with it
after step 2. is done if there is no objection.
3. Anything else I should be looking at in this phase of the game?
Doug
--- /usr/src/etc/rc Sat Aug 28 13:51:10 1999
+++ rc Sat Aug 28 14:08:25 1999
@@ -8,24 +8,25 @@
# and the consol
Ben Smithurst wrote:
Doug wrote:
Okey dokey, I can take a hint. :)
Can you take another one, regarding the unnecessary spaces after the
values in your "case"s? i.e., that they should be taken out and shot?
:-)
*sigh* I am constantly flabbergasted by what pe
/etc/motd
/usr/src/etc/namedb/named.root
/usr/src/etc/rc.diskless1
/usr/src/etc/rc.diskless2
/usr/src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc
/usr/src/etc/termcap.small
Having the tags in the files helps mergemaster, if nothing else. :)
Thanks,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
I've seen quite a few reports of this lately, and while this fixes it, it
shouldn't be necessary, should it? Has something changed in the 'make
upgrade' target recently?
Doug
"Andy V. Oleynik" wrote:
Crist, I had latly same sort of things.
Fix is to define in ur /etc
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, John Birrell wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 09:13:58AM -0700, Doug wrote:
I've seen quite a few reports of this lately, and while this fixes it, it
shouldn't be necessary, should it? Has something changed in the 'make
upgrade' target recently?
`make' has
m. Maybe I'm missing something
though... Also, keep in mind that it's not just case sensitivity that
we're working with here. It's also the fact that case is a sh builtin, as
opposed to test which is not.
If you want to see what I've got so far check out
http://gorean.org/rcfiles/
Doug
--
"
John Birrell wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 03:55:42PM -0700, Doug wrote:
`make' has changed.
Ok, that's the cause then, so what's the solution? :) And
meanwhile is it going to hurt anything if I put a suggestion on my 'make
upgrade' web page that users do 'make -DMACHINE_ARCH
add a vote for this since
we have multiple machines with 16k user password files. I had intended to
start looking at the code and offer a solution instead of a me too, but it
sounds like others are already on the right track, so I'll be glad to test
something if someone comes up with patches.
Doug
--
&qu
of the port itself, ala majordomo? That
works just fine and is completely non-controversial because you don't get
it unless you ask for it.
Doug
--
"My mama told me, my mama said, 'don't cry.' She said, 'you're too young a man
to have as many women you got.' I looked at my mother dear and didn't even
is the responsibility
of the port maintainers. There is no point in adding something to the base
system that will only benefit a few people when a mechanism to solve the
problem which does not affect people who don't want the port(s) is already
available.
Doug
--
"My mama told me, my mama said, '
why it's a
bad idea.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
freebsd-hacking time tomorrow if there are any more nits to be picked.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Present in -Stable and -Current. If you go to Configure | Distributions |
src and attempt to choose All, the src distribution never gets selected and
nothing gets installed. I can send a PR if needed, but it's such a small
thing I didn't think it would be worth it.
Doug
To Unsubscribe
than just panic().
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
of reasons. Completely beyond me to code, but very nice from the design
standpoint.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ombo,
just wondering if it's duplicating existing technology.
Doug
--
"My mama told me, my mama said, 'don't cry.' She said, 'you're too young a man
to have as many women you got.' I looked at my mother dear and didn't even
crack a smile. I said, 'If women kill me, I don't mind dyin!'"
ations I tried.
Well, I'm finally in a position where I have a third computer to try, and
lo and behold my workstation machine can run a serial console just fine,
but the server machine was all scrambled. So, last night I bought a serial
port card and voila, FINALLY I have a serial console.
TIA for
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Doug wrote:
I know that someone will be tempted to warn me about the evils of
overclocking, but please don't. :) However, just in case anyone is
interested either the overclocking or the overdrive chip seems to have
fried the on-board serial ports on this machine
.
Why do you want to specify the port? If you have no need to do
that, just leave the option out.
Good luck,
Doug
--
"My mama told me, my mama said, 'don't cry.' She said, 'you're too young a man
to have as many women you got.' I looked at my mother dear and didn't even
crack a smile. I
like :
pkg_delete /var/db/pkg/netscape-communicator-4.61/
A hearty "Me too" for this option. It's something I've often wished
for. I can 'cd /var/db/pkg' a lot easier than I can reprogram zsh, but
it'd still be nice to have this option.
Thanks,
Doug
--
"Stop it, I'm
will see in there are instructions for new
users who want to contribute to the project.
Good luck,
Doug
--
"Stop it, I'm gettin' misty."
- Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Doug wrote:
Takanori Watanabe wrote:
Not necessary. The mainboards of the ASUS P2B series have
everything onboard that you need. We have it working with
the intpm0 driver and a tool called "lm" that I donwloaded
from somewhere in Japan (forgot the URL, sorry).
dumps when the machine comes back.
Thanks,
Doug
--
"Stop it, I'm gettin' misty."
- Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
it's just bad luck. In any case, here is the latest data. Any
input would be appreciated. I can resend the pertinent details to anyone
who needs them.
Thanks,
Doug
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
mp_lock = 0005; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 0100
fault virtual address
lp mail me and let me know.
Doug
--
"Stop it, I'm gettin' misty."
- Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
now and haven't found
anything that will give me this information on a running process. Any
pointers would be welcome.
Thanks,
Doug
--
"Stop it, I'm gettin' misty."
- Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
need to do is
remove the world rx permissions on the parent directory, and make sure
that they don't have access via the group permissions. You might also
want to look at chroot.
Good luck,
Doug
--
"Stop it, I'm gettin' misty."
- Mel Gibson as Porter, "Payback"
To Un
n some IBM DeskStar drives on
us, and they've been no end of trouble. He _may_ live to regret his
"mistake." The good news is that the first machine rebuilt with the SCSI
drives and using ncr0 + fxp0 is not showing any signs of trouble.
Crossing fingers,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail
to look at just about
anything at this point.
Just thought you might have missed the obvious.
*Nod* That's always a possibility, NFS is definitely not my thing,
although I'm learning more and more about it as I go along. :-/
Thanks,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord
, and
then disable one service with a -d for don't wrap, and vv.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Since y'all are discussing inetd.conf, here is something else to
consider.
Doug
Original Message
Subject: Re: misc/11796: Bad lines in 3.2-RELEASE inetd.conf
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 12:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Studded stud...@gorean.org
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav d
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:02:14 MST, Doug wrote:
The service-name entry is the name of a valid service in the file
/etc/services. For ``internal'' services (discussed below), the
service name must be the official name of the service
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:12:26 MST, Doug wrote:
Can you point out exactly what part of the man page that you are
referring to that contradicts what the inetd man page says? Have you
checked the actual code for inetd to verify that it will work
On 21 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Doug d...@gorean.org writes:
You are really really missing my point here, so I will state it
again. If you have carefully examined the code for *every* case of *every*
internal service, and you have tested it thoroughly, and you are 100% sure
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:42:46 MST, Doug wrote:
[...] there is an outstanding PR that shows it
doesn't work for everybody, and there is absolutely no justification for
leaving an example in the conf file that conflicts with the man page
should ship with per service toggles,
and all of them toggled off, with a hosts.allow with nothing but ALL :
ALL in it. But then again I've been called overcautious.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
and more common (and they will be, fast and
furious) multi-processor and NFS are for all practical purposes already
the reality now, and will only be more so in the future.
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 10:54:37AM -0700, Doug wrote:
In short, increasing SMP efficiency should really be a priority
for N2 systems.
Agreed. But this is a BIG job, because to do that you have to solve the
one big kernel lock problem
1 - 100 of 1133 matches
Mail list logo
