check how the modules do this..
also, look at the example device driver in -current
/usr/share/examples/drivers/make_device_driver.sh
that makes and then compiles a driver.
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Kreider, Carl wrote:
I've been tasked with a driver for a video capture card. I've been
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 04:25:00PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
This was actually discussed a while back (a month or two ago).
It got really bogged down when someone pointed out that
they were running CPUs with different clock rates in their
nice idea.. procmail for packets.
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Here is something I miss a lot:
I would like a small program which can listen to a specified divert(4)
socket and act on the incoming packets.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you are no doubt aware there are significant infrastructural
changes in -current relating to SMP scalability. It's in a very
interim state at the moment, and one of the downsides is increased
I remember someone saying that they were going to make a repository
for patches for releases.
In particular I[m looking at teh TCP patches that fixed the slow transfers
in some situations. Thes changes were put in before 4.5
so I want to find them to upgrade some production 4.4 machines.
I
sure I can get them,
I'm just trying to find who it was that said they were compiling a set of
good patches for 4.4
Ken
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
I remember someone saying that they were going to make a repository
for patches for releases.
In particular I[m looking
yes, thanks.. he recognised it too :-)
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/freebsd-backports.html
Is that what you're thinking of?
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Programmer or [EMAIL
YES!
Thanks
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I remember someone saying that they were going to make a repository
for patches for releases.
In particular I[m looking at teh TCP patches that fixed the slow
what would be even nicer is if ipfw found the cached entry and passed it
back to ip_input so it didn't need to :-)
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 05:07:55PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
There are redundant calls to the in_pcblookup_hash() in the
he said -stable..
what are the malloc options on -stable?
maybe we should make sure that they are null
ln -s /etc/malloc.conf
(I hope that helps) :)
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Dimitar Peikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020307 00:45] wrote:
I start some performance tests on
which one does the data come from?
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
Is there any fundamental reason why a page can not be owned by more than
one VM object? If that was the case, the bogus page stuff in vfs_bio.c
could be made cleaner IMHO.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail
The coding style guide for freebsd says that a blank line shalll be above
the code and below teh variable declarations..
most peopple take this to read that the blank line still appears if there
are no variables.
I'm sorry if this offends your personal style, but a group has to have SME
style
disks don't work in 512 byte blocks.
they work inTRACKS these days..
if you ask for an entire track to be written,
that is almost certainly quicker than if you ask for every 2ns block in
that track to be written because the second option requires that it read
the track first. ALso the seek may
sounds good..
can you send us a patch to look at?
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
There are redundant calls to the in_pcblookup_hash() in the
ip_fw_chk() function called via (*ip_fw_chk_ptr)() in the
ip_input path.
Would it be useful to modify the (*pr_input) function pointer
It actually did a jmp 0
(or call 0)
do you have any out-of date modules loaded?
maybe an out of date firewall module?
(it happens when you are doing some firewall code)
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, ICA Canada Online wrote:
Running FreeBSD 4.5 and it keeps rebooting around the same time late during
more writes fit in the disk's write cache?
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
I am doing some raw I/O test on a seagate SCSI disk running FreeBSD 4.5.
This situation is like this:
+-++++++++++---+--
| ||||||
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Read the man page to try and decide if you should write if (x) or
if (x != 0).
Fix:
Apply the attached page to the style(9) man page.
[...]
the one that I stop to think about is:
if (!(flags FLAGSET))
or should that be
if
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Lars Eggert wrote:
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
Several times slower! The point is that writing less data performs
worse. So I call it weird.
Huh? You originally said:
(1) Write each block fully and sequentially, ie. 8192 bytes.
(2) I still write these blocks
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
If its actually a Realtek clone with a few differences it wouldn't make
sense to add a whole new driver to the system.
Just a side note; the Realtek driver isn't entirely up to date. The
chip
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
Zap 'ptrace(PT_READ_U, ...)' and 'ptrace(PT_WRITE_U, ...)' since they
are a really nasty interface that should have been killed long ago
when 'ptrace(PT_[SG]ETREGS' etc came along. The entity that they
operate on (struct user) will not be around
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
Zap 'ptrace(PT_READ_U, ...)' and 'ptrace(PT_WRITE_U, ...)' since they
are a really nasty interface that should have been killed long ago
when 'ptrace(PT_[SG]ETREGS' etc came along. The entity that they
operate on (struct user) will not be around
Is it possible that by adding the correct PCI ID teh realtek driver might
handle them?
(I'm just wondering if we alreay have a driver that is equivalent to
the myson driver...?)
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
did you say
I was suggesting this at the kernel meeting
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
there were no changes needed for network drivers resulting from KSE
(or maybe a single word change)
What errors do you get?
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:49:07AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my0@pci0:11:0:
class=0x02 card=0x08031516
I have been speaking with the author.
he is adding a BSD copyright.
also he says we can KNFify (style(9)ify?) as it doesn't have to remain
compatible with anything else.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:49:07AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
I have been speaking with the author.
he is adding a BSD copyright.
also he says we can KNFify (style(9)ify?) as it doesn't have to remain
compatible with anything else.
It might be nice
www.myson.com.tw: Unable to reolve.
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found:
http://www.myson.com.tw/mtd/driver/803/mtd80x-freebsd.tgz.TGZ
to work splendidly with 4.5. Would be nice to see them rolled in.
Dw
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
The value of network debugging to me is not that I can
avoid buying a serial cable (big deal), it's that I can
do the debugging remotely.
Agreed.
If I'm going to ssh into a local machine and debug from
there, then I can use a serial cable.
did you say that there are other cards apparently OEM'd from these?
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found:
http://www.myson.com.tw/mtd/driver/803/mtd80x-freebsd.tgz.TGZ
to work splendidly with 4.5. Would be nice to see them rolled in.
Dw
To Unsubscribe:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
Without TCP, you have to implement your own version of
retry and ack (equivalent to negotiating a window size
of 1), and so you have to redo what's already there.
Would be nice to have a reliable channel but in our
experience not having this was
try
man pciconf
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Frost, Stephen C wrote:
Oh FreeBSD Gurus...
I tried throwing this out to the 'Questions' listserver and got zero reply.
So
Is there some quick, down dirty way of assessing the bus-speeds of PCI
slots/busses on a given box? I have a whole
This is cool.
As people talk about this it seems that more and more of the needed parts
are already available from one source or another..
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Michael Smith wrote:
1) Easy to write a very minimal, outside the stack, IP/UDP layer.
One (very nasty) already exists in
Ok, so now George has so many choices to choose from
that I'm expecting 3 different implementations from him, with no common
components :-)
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Benedikt Schmidt wrote:
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Michael Smith wrote
using tcp for this is I think wrong..
Use UDP or maybe even an special protocol on IP.
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
Now that Luigi has put in polling support for some ethernet drivers
I was wondering how much work it would be to make the
1/
can you say whay you want to do this?
2/
check the code that creates kernel threads, (kthread_create())
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Jonathan BENSAMOUN wrote:
Hi
I coded a syscall which fork inside kernel and launch a new process.
The unique problem I got is when the father is waiting the
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Bakul Shah wrote:
I may have forgotten a few things but this is the gist of how
it worked. Credit for all this work goes to someone else.
We had meant to give this back to the FreeBSD community but
didn't get around to it in time and now it is not possible.
Why
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
FWIW, Julian had to fix a similar problem by programming
the heck out of a Cyrix MediaGX chipset via a custom
BIOS.
*snort* (wakes up)..
wha? wha?
what is the problem?
The one I had to program around was bad DMA for transfers not on a 16 byte
basically yes.
there is a CRC on the disk block right?
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Terry Lambert writes:
So.. Is PIO safe? Is there any sort of CRC being done on PIO data?
He just said: if your chipset is programmed correctly
by the BIOS, then there will not
yes but we might as well be protocol compatible if possible :-)
If only to re-use what they did in gdb :-)
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
I was talking to Louis Gerbarg about this topic at the BSDCon last
week. Apparently Darwin already has this functionality, so I
you mean they use the same protocol?
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 16:52:48 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
I was talking to Louis Gerbarg about this topic at the BSDCon last
week. Apparently
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Danny J. Zerkel wrote:
Maybe cvs is an academic toy. Most real development requires a real
configuration management system. Why do you think there is work being done
on FreeBSD in Perforce? The sooner FreeBSD and Linux can escape the clutches
of cvs, the better.
define a task activation delay and maybe we can discuss it..
it's a rather broad definition.
and is that RTlinux? (which is a completly differnt kettle of fish..)
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Eugene Panchenko wrote:
gretings.
As seen on kerneltrap.org:
---
Andrew Morton: Ingo Molnar broke the
Hi George.
There was someone recently that posted that they had some sort of
remote debuging working over an ethernet (or at least that they ALMOST
had it working.). I remember thinking Cool. I have however had good
success with the serial crossover cables needed for the curren serial
debugger.
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi George.
There was someone recently that posted that they had some sort of
remote debuging working over an ethernet (or at least that they ALMOST
had it working.). I remember thinking Cool. I have however had good
success with the serial
will it be able to send pages from the filesystem or just preloaded pages?
How will you configure it?
I can suggest using a netgraph module for the work as it can be connected
to a netgraph ksocket node to receive the requests (jdp made all the
changes needed to allow this to be done).
It also
that patch is an MFC of a fix that went into -current.
it allows teh 'fwd' ing of packets from the 'input' filter to
external machines..
i.e.
this doesn't work without this patch:
ipfw add 100 fwd 1.2.3.4 tcp from any to 1.2.3.5 80 in recv fxp0
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On
there is one.
Written by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it's proprietary but maybe not..
(CC'd)
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Dominic Marks wrote:
Hey,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 06:33:43AM -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
hi all,
[ I am not currently subscribed to -questions, please CC a copy to
me,
now all we need is to connnect it to sysctl
remote configuration of your kernel via web interface
(runs screaming from room)
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, John Polstra wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is one.
Written by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
the netgraph ng_ksocket is the basis of how it was done.
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 11:05:04AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
Yes, I wrote one. Yes, it's proprietary.
One obvious example is as part of a testbed for performance
testing various kinds
there is a netgraph module in standard systems
(ng_ksocket) that does the socket part but youstill need to
write the http node.. John Polstra's one is proprietary.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Rogier R. Mulhuijzen wrote:
At 14:59 17-2-2002 +, Dominic Marks wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Fourth, I think the reason he made the joke about MSCE's
was that there are ways of doing true zero copy, using
DMA directly between devices. There are a couple of
people that have done this by, for example, rewriting
the Tigon II firmware to
try
daemon(args..);
.
(man 3 daemon)
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Magdalinin Kirill wrote:
Hello,
can anyone, please, point out a C skeleton for FreeBSD daemon.
Is the following simple example correct for FreeBSD?
if (getppid() != 1)
{
signal(SIGTTOU, SIG_IGN);
check out 'jail'
start the daemon within the startup script of the jail.
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Walter Hop wrote:
Hi all,
just like many people, I want to run my dangerous daemons as a
non-root user in a chroot environment. Now, I would usually use the
``su'', or ``chroot'' tools from
well he may speak for only himself..
as for me I have no idea what a 'zone' is in Linux..
timezone?
memory zone allocator in the kernel?
routing zones?
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
Thanks for your reminder. I guess I didnt realize they would consider
simple and easy beneath
Network Interface Card
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Vladislav V. Anikiev wrote:
Hello Brian,
The MAC address - I meen The Media Access Control address (i.e., ethernet
hardware address, not IP address). I want to use the default hardware (not
current physical ) address in my license
he infrastructure needed for a new driver can be taken from
the sample driver in /usr/share/examples/drivers/make_device_driver.sh
IN -CURRENT. (use cvdweb on the website to get it)
that will at least get rid of the 'shims' stuff.
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, John wrote:
*** Please reply directly,
use the linuxthreads port..
that will give you exact linux-threads compatibility..
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Umesh Krishnaswamy wrote:
Hi Folks,
Are there any gotchas about porting over from Linux a multi-threaded
application? FreeBSD version that I am using is 4.2.
Thanks.
Umesh.
To
check where init is called from..
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Jonathan BENSAMOUN wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add a new syscall in my kernel which execute an execve in a
forked process.
I call the fork1 function and hook inside it to execute my execve.
Has anyone an example of calling execve
says it all.
If you know of a touch screen that can be interfaced to FreeBSD let me
know..
thanks..
Julian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
that showed up at
FreeBSDCon 99 (I think). My memory fails me on the name of the person
that brought it but I'm sure he's on -hackers (maybe) :)
-Bill
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 10:12:01AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
says it all.
If you know of a touch screen that can be interfaced
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Skye Poier wrote:
Word on the street is that Julian Elischer said:
My confusion is around splitting/concatenating -
When splitting an mbuf chain, the two resultant chains must be as above
(heads have M_PKTHDR and mbuf.m_pkthdr.len set) right
if you make your incoming Write-only then they will hav elottle point in
puting stuff there..
We do this, in several places, and have a script move the incoming stuff
elsewhere at regular intervals too.
(not that I disagree with your patch but I often mode 'dot files'
e.g. .cshrc, or even CVS #
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Skye Poier wrote:
What are the rules around mbuf chain construction?
(I've read man mbuf, doesnt go into much detail)
In particular, I'm assuming:
- all mbufs must be same type
- the head mbuf must have M_PKTHDR set
- the head mbuf.m_pkthdr.len must be the len of
start with the * -current *** version of
/usr/share/examples/drivers/make_device_driver.sh
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Fook Sheng Chan wrote:
Hi
I wish to learn to write a device driver for toshiba
satellite 1800-A500. How do i go about doing it?
Do i need info from Toshiba? i don't seem
He's talking about the different 'group' setting.. I think.
it's different because SYSV (linux is based on the semantics of sysV) and
BSD have a differnt semantic on this and always have..
BSD makes the file get the same group as the directory.
Linux gives it the primary group of the creator.
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, K S Sreeram wrote:
Hi
My name is K.S.Sreeram, and i am very much interested in contributing to
the
[...]
Sounds like you are ideally suited to this:-)
here are some starting tips.
Tip 1: no-one is going to ask you to do some particular thing. We are
all
yes.
man ppp
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Matthew wrote:
is ADSL virtual dialing, ie, pppoe protocol supported in FreeBSD 4.3?
I need to use my FreeBSD box to dial through ADSL to the net.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the
the threads package doesn't do file IO asynchronoulsy
in fact there ahve been several people threatenning to use AIO
to make the threads package to that asychronously too.
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Doug White wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, k Macy wrote:
Has anybody used AIO in conjunction with
the driver should return ENOBUFS
and TCP should repect that..
I think it already does in fact..
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:I'm talking about capping the maximum negotiable window size
:over the USB adapter...
:
:How can this cause problems, since (1) the only thing we are
my stupid :-)
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:the driver should return ENOBUFS
:and TCP should repect that..
:I think it already does in fact..
How does the client's driver returning ENOBUFS prevent the server from
sending too many packets?
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:the driver should return ENOBUFS
:and TCP should repect that..
:I think it already does in fact..
How does the client's driver returning ENOBUFS prevent the server from
sending too many packets?
Matt:
unfortunatly Bill, he wants to combile it with bridging
(policy bridging?) and luigi never installed fwd or divert
on the bridge ipfw hook..
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 04:36:25PM -0300, Joao Carlos wrote:
Is there any way to create routes using only
man queue
man TAILQ_FIRST
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Aleksander Rozman wrote:
Hi !
I have finally started with my work on that protocol I was telling you about
(ax.25), but now I have come to a problem. Some of old structs for
networking were changed and now they use TAILQ macros. There is
On Tue, 25 Dec 2001, Barak Enat wrote:
Hi all,
Note: Please reply to this mail as well because I'm not subscribed to
this mailing list.
I have two questions regarding FreeBSD virtual memory and
paging/swapping system:
1. When a page fault occurs does the entire system stalls, or
I think both mpd and the normal ppp can do this.
Certainly mpd can, (check with archie) but i doubrt that many ISPs can.
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Ted Sikora wrote:
Anyone know how or a link for setting up MP 'multilink' PPPoe DSL on
FreeBSD. I have PPPoe on FreeBSD-STABLE with 2 cards and DSL
It is possible that Kirk may be thinking about doing this. He mumbled
something about a new FS a while ago but it wasn't clear whether he was
thinking of doing it, or he was just saying someone will eventually do
it.
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Dave Reyenga wrote:
How about writing a new filesystem
also look at (in current
only!) /usr/share/examples/drivers/make_device_driver.sh
is makes a driver with ISA, and PCI-based interfaces.
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Chuck T. wrote:
I'm trying to write an ISA device driver from scratch and I'm also trying to
make it a kernel loadable to make my
If you were using PPPoE for the DSL, then you could
possibly use multilink ppp.
The trick would be to see if the ppp server at the other end
can recognise multilink PPP when it's getting it's ppp off ATM/PPPoE..
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Lars Eggert wrote:
rick norman wrote:
What would be
Your first task would be to show that it is a generally useful
and expected behaviour to end up in a login with a different username to
that which you started out with.
If you can prove that there are other useful reasons to do this,
in addition to your own app, then certainly it would make
in 4.4 or 5.x you can set the flags in /boot/device.hints
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
While compiling a debug kernel, I forgot to set the flag of sio0 to
0x80. Is there anyway I can fix this quickly without recompiling
the kernel? Thanks,
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send
thanks.. That's quite amazing..
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
I've tried getting information about our (FreeBSD) mail
system by mailing to postmaster but no-one answers..
so, who IS the postmaster at the moment?
I have the .elischer.org domain
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
If there is anything wrong with netgraph is that there's a lack of examples of
setting up common configurations in the handbook, man pages, and other
documents.
/usr/share/examples/netgraph gives examples of some
I've tried getting information about our (FreeBSD) mail
system by mailing to postmaster but no-one answers..
so, who IS the postmaster at the moment?
I have the .elischer.org domain set up at Netowrk solutions
with a contact address of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
however whenever I try change anything
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I mentioned above, we CAN license the driver code and the DDK for
development. This means that you could produce FreeBSD drivers which we
could then distribute in a binary form under a free end-user license.
Frankly this is the only way
it in ways we hadn't thought of
and to make new modules to extend it. (also to avoid having a special
control program for each new kind of node).
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, John Polstra wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Netgraph is a prototyping tool
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The concept that netgraph hooks are a leg up on say, ETs drivers that
have integrated bandwidth management and prioritization, WAN bridging
support, load balancing and a probably 25% performance advantage is a bit
entertaining. Unless you
386BSD got it from the MACH Vm
which was grafted into BSD some time in 1990 or the late 80's
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, setantae wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:31:31PM +0100, Gérard Roudier wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, setantae wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:54:17PM -,
netgraph?
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Rajesh P Jain wrote:
Thanks for all the replies.
In linux, the packet reception can be done efficiently through the usage of
ethernet sockets.
In FreeBSD, one of the option is by using the BPF. But, as already commented,
BPF is not a high
If it's an ethernet type device
then you can attach to it via netgraph
and either write a small netgraph node to do what you want
or redirect the packets to a userland daemon that
does what you want.
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Rajesh P Jain wrote:
Hello,
We are trying to use BPF (Packet
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Frost, Stephen C wrote:
Greetings FreeBSD gurus -
I am brand new to the OS. I test NIC drivers for Intel products and we are
turning towards an emphasized support for FreeBSD. One of my test boxes
produces the following error on bootup: panic:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Glenn Gombert wrote:
In case anyone is interested...I have X11 running with FreeBSD as a Guest
operating system under Win2K..the current XFree86 server (v 4.101)
that is in the ports collection, runs ok with the generic wm that comes
with XFree86, when I try and
oh yeah there was a period where the lnc driver caused a crash
of vmware.
leave it out and try again
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Koster, K.J. wrote:
Dear Rohit,
Thanks for the response and your suggestion.
Fatal trap 12: page fault in vm86 mode
The following change helped me get
I have been running -current under vmware 2.x up until about August..
(it didn't stop working, but I vmware stopped running on -current
due to KSE changes (patches now available I believe))..
i.e I was running -current under -current
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Koster, K.J. wrote:
Dear Rohit,
Try the one from -current..
If it works maybe it should be MFC'd
julian
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
I looked at /usr/share/examples/drivers/make_pseudo_driver.sh but it
seems to be a bit out of date. Running it, it creates a file
files.devicename in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf,
errr try the 'device driver'
you are making a real device driver, not a pseudo driver..
(the pseudo driver should go away I think...)
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:36:16PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Try the one from -current..
If it works maybe
, Julian Elischer wrote:
when the system is looping, hit CTLALTESC
to drop into the debugger.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mark Santcroos wrote:
:How can I see in what piece of the kernel it is looping?
:(I know about where
when the system is looping, hit CTLALTESC
to drop into the debugger.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mark Santcroos wrote:
:How can I see in what piece of the kernel it is looping?
:(I know about where it is, but not exactly)
:
Use ddb to set a break
.
You can talk to Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I believe he worked for
a company that was developing a binary only driver for the wavelans that would
allow it to be a base station. You would have to purchase this driver I
think, but it would be much cheaper than buying an access point
Bill Paul has written a specific NETGRAPH FEC module...
he has failover as well..
(it is only PART a netgraph module as it doesn;t use the netgraph hooks to
talk to teh ethernet driver.. (strange))
I suggest you look for it in the archives or on
http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/
On Sat, 20 Oct
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
Well, honestly, FreeBSD makes the life of the developers of third-party
binary-only drivers fairly difficult.
It does? On the whole, actually, I'd say we do a pretty good job of
making it easy.
The reason is that there
are a lot of API
801 - 900 of 1378 matches
Mail list logo
