Re: A handy utility (at least for me)

3 -name work -print -delete -prune I would be surprised if the globbing in most shells was more efficient than find. Although as mentioned before, nothing beats putting all the work directories in a single location, and using a single rm command. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: bad news for bsdtar..

being embedded in everything (tar, pax, cpio, pkg_*, etc). Tim has done a great job with this so far. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any

Re: AoE for FreeBSD

to run (g)vinum on top of AOE drives? Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tcsh is not csh

). Since there are plenty of good third party shells, there are many other tasks for which FreeBSD developers can better spend their time. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: tcsh fix

things to worry about, the current setup is just fine with me. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: FUD about CGD and GBDE

encrypt with a single key. Just throwing out a data point. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Call for thread testers

OpenLDAP would also be interesting. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Scott Long wrote: All, This is kind of an unconventional call for help. As we approach the release of 5.2, we'd really like to show off the performance and stability of our new threading packages. So, I'm looking for people

Re: PUzzling sshd behaviour

and aliases. I figured that nsswitch.conf would deprecate host.conf. Is this not true? Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Re: A new sort utility

with the BSD licensed version, and move the current one to a port gnu-sort, or whatever. I suddenly feel the need to go build a bikeshed. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: USB keyboard thoughts.

In several recent articles, I've read that with the new Intel BTX motherboards, they are going to drop many of the legacy ports (like PS/2 mouse and keyboard). So, this may soon become a more common situation. Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, David Gilbert wrote: DG I acquired

Re: Hyperthreading slowdown

as compared to the difference between -j1 and -j2 for a single threaded kernel. It's over a 50% slowdown. Richard Coleman ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Re: Hyperthreading slowdown

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:20:03PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:39:03PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote: I installed FreeBSD 4.9RC1 on P4 3GHz with hyperthreading and I see drastic slowdown when kernel with hyperthreading

Re: integer and long max/min values

machines?). I doubt the GCC docs talk about this. You might check Richard Steven's book on Advanced Unix Programming. It covers lots of information about standard machine limits and how to discover them. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL

Re: ipfw/ipf IP filtering thoughts

for pf in the ports tree. But I haven't tried it, since ipf is working fine for me. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Re: I'm resigning from FreeBSD

I think the FreeBSD is dying crowd from slashdot have found the FreeBSD mailing lists. They must be mad because they got a lump of coal in their Christmas stocking. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pull-Henning Kunt wrote: Back in the day, around FreeBSD 2.2.8, it was a very nice operating

Re: Discussion on the future of floppies in 5.x and 6.x

the alternative. Thanks, Scott I apologize if this is a dumb question. But rather than using two floppies during the install process, why not three or four? Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: Discussion on the future of floppies in 5.x and 6.x

Richard Coleman wrote: Scott Long wrote: All, Every FreeBSD release cycle in the past year has hit bumps due to install floppy problems. This is becoming more and more of a burden on the Release Engineering Team, as we simply do not have the resources to constantly battle the floppies. FreeBSD

Re: need help on CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf please

, that part of the handbook should really be removed. I can easily imagine the reaction on this list if the reverse were true, and the gcc handbook was knocking FreeBSD for a bug in release 3.0 (or whatever). Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Adding 'realclean' target to /usr/src/Makefile

for something else. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Google SoC idea

to DragonflyBSD? What you are talking about appears very similar. Or am I misunderstanding something? Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any