On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 07:55:21PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
The FreeBSD Core Team took a look at the APSL a while back, and decided
that similar to LGPL/GPL, it was an acceptable license for use in
userspace for stand-alone tools
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
regarding the APSL (http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/), do you think
it is possible to import some darwin commands w/ mods.
for instance, I thing to decomment and relpath from bootstrap_cmds, sadc
and sar from system_cmds, and maybe some
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
what are the implications on running an SMP enabled kernel on a UP
machine ?
I first thought of things like:
- performence (most likely not worth the discussion ?)
- additional locking problematic ?
- ... ?
Or asked the other way round: why
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 03:26:27PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Has anyone got it installed under FreeBSD?
I got the demo to run and install pretty well (for some reason I can't play it
in KDE, I have to drop back to twm otherwise my system
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Le Thursday 01 April 2004 09:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb a écrit :
Hi,
what are the implications on running an SMP enabled kernel on a UP
machine ?
I first thought of things like:
- performence (most likely not worth the discussion ?)
I got an
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Ganbold wrote:
Hi,
I traced sshd using ktrace and it says:
..
10198 new CALL setuid(0)
10198 new RET setuid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted
10198 new CALL execve(0x80485d0,0xbfbfed8c,0xbfbfed94)
10198 new NAMI /home/new/new.pl
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, David Gilbert wrote:
Has anyone made an attempt to run usermode linux on FreeBSD? Is the
issue-list long?
There was a neat paper at BSDCon 2003 discussing running usermode FreeBSD
on Linux, and it talked about what would be necessary to make usermode
FreeBSD run on
On 9 Mar 2004, Bin Ren wrote:
Hi, all:
I've been reading sched_ule.c and seem to find a serious error:
in 'sched_slice()':
* Rationale:
* KSEs in interactive ksegs get the minimum slice so that we
* quickly notice if it abuses its advantage.
Then, there
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Kiss Tibor wrote:
I want to create a small kernel module which logs the socket operations.
So in my module I have a socket structure, and i want to know which
process (thread) owns that. I try to solve this problem by this way:
Sockets, as with files, can be referenced
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Randy Pratt wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:03:40 +0100 (CET) you wrote:
I've been on the question list for some time, and I have noticed
that many people do not know how to get sound support up and
running in FreeBSD 5.X. I know that re-compiling the kernel is easy
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Zajcev Evgeny wrote:
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, using a scary combination of grep, awk, a long list of omit this
regexp's, and prcc from cflow, I got the following:
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20040302-sockets.ps
Actually
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, using a scary combination of grep, awk, a long list of omit this
regexp's, and prcc from cflow, I got the following:
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20040302-sockets.ps
Duck
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Robert Watson wrote:
I'd like to generate static call graphs from sections of src/sys/kern,
src/sys/net, and src/sys/netinet, and ideally, get an output that looks
pretty when printed to a (perhaps large) piece of paper. It doesn't
need to be able to handle function
I'd like to generate static call graphs from sections of src/sys/kern,
src/sys/net, and src/sys/netinet, and ideally, get an output that looks
pretty when printed to a (perhaps large) piece of paper. It doesn't need
to be able to handle function pointer magic in structures (vnode
operations,
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Don Bowman wrote:
this would only allow 2 concurrent TCP sessions per unique
source address. Depends on the syn flood you are expecting
to experience. You could also use dummynet to shape syn
traffic to a fixed level i
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:10:40PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
In sys/sys/sysctl.h I see function kernel_sysctlbyname() that looks (to
me) to be intended for accessing sysctl values from kernel, but for it's
first parameter it requires a struct
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, db wrote:
I've been running 5.2 on my laptop (i386 Acer) for some time now. Few
hours ago I download the 5.2.1-release source, buildworld, buildkernel,
installkernel, but after a few minuts of installworld my system froze.
Now when I try to boot I get:
Ouch.
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 19 February 2004 08:43 pm, Ted Unangst wrote:
Hi. These are some bugs found by Coverity in a static analysis run on the
FreeBSD kernel. All these are use after free bugs.
Thanks for the excellent bug reports!
I wonder if the same
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Andrew J Caines wrote:
After Ring the various FMs including, but not limited to, mdmfs(8),
mdconfig(8) malloc(9), I am unclear whether of not the memory used by md
of type MD_MALLOC is kernel memory which will not be swapped, or not.
On the same subject, does the the
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Colin Percival wrote:
At 00:56 14/02/2004, Robert Watson wrote:
If you
have swap available, you pretty much always want to use swap-backing for
memory disks -- if there's room in memory they will run as fast as
malloc-backed, but you don't have to be as worried about
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
the KSE stuff requires too much assistance from teh Userland Thread
scheduler.
HOWEVER it is possible that kthreads may one day be implemented as
multiple threads of a single kernel process.. (but not yet)
John has been talking about doing
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Danny Braniss wrote:
thanks! with so much garbage/software/noise around it's difficult to
see the gems. and hearing from first hand is very important. true also
that google hit it first, but you provided the missing link.
If you want to peruse the FreeBSD perforce
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Renaud Molla Wanadoo wrote:
I'm trying to use the kthread library under 5.2-RELEASE but can't
compile my program (which actually only tries to create a thread).
I've read that there is now KSE to create kernel threads, but i am
wondering if it could be used within the
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Robert Watson wrote:
To pick up the corrupted packet on the machine where the corruption is
occurring, you might want to try hooking up the UDP checksum drop case to
BPF_MTAP() for a special BPF device or rule, or have
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I tracked down an occassional buildworld failure on DragonFly to my
XL driver, which is synchronized to 4.x's XL driver.
It would be very helpful if you could do the following:
(1) See if you can reproduce this using something other than NFS
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Max Laier wrote:
On Saturday 24 January 2004 17:06, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I tracked down an occassional buildworld failure on DragonFly to
my XL driver, which is synchronized to 4.x's XL driver.
FYI
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 01:38:37PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
...
(2) Try the NDIS driver with the NDIS-u-lator on FreeBSD 5.x and see if
that also has the problem.
but going this way you have no idea on what the driver does, including
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 02:12:12PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
...
but going this way you have no idea on what the driver does, including
enabling hw checksums. This looks like a useless test at least for the
purpose of finding out what is going
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Well, I tried to tcpdump a session. I managed to hit the error three
times but in all three cases the tcpdump on the server dropped the
particular packet I was looking for. I'm only able to get a 70%
retention rate in the tcpdump
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Lukas Ertl wrote:
I step in. I complained bitterly about the rip-it-off-plans.
s/plans/proposal/
I'm currently not able to help out coding, but I would gladly
supply remote console access to a box suitable for vinum testing.
(Including access to a local
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Liam Foy wrote:
shutdown -p now is dependant upon hardware, and am 100% sure my hardware
supports this; yet it still does not work. Must I have anything added to
my kernel configuration or anything?
What version of FreeBSD are you using? Do you have ACPI enabled, if on
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Besides that i'd like to add that FreeBSD has the fastest forwarding engine
i've seen on any free OS. It's in my opinion a very suitable OS for
routing/forwarding.
We are working on it to make it even faster. If you are using 5.2 or
-current
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Matt Freitag wrote:
Building 5.2-RELEASE from 5.1-RELEASE-p10 w/ipf+ipfw+ipfw6+dummynet, 5.1
Compiled fine with this setup. I need ipfilter as it's doing my source
routing for ipv6 (multiple transits) since ip6fw doesn't support fwd. (I
just use ip6fw for filtering, and
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Eric Masson wrote:
Robert == Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Moving to PFIL_HOOKS for all the funky IP input/ouput
Will all available packet filters, including ipfw rely on PFIL_HOOKS or
not ?
Yes; we to make it so that ipfw will also rely
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Ryan Beasley wrote:
I'm poring over some code that uses the p_[usi]ticks counters inside of
struct proc. This is fine under 4.x where kinfo_proc includes a copy of
proc, but is broken under 5.x since a commit 3 years ago that
reorganized kinfo_proc.
So, outside of
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, David Gilbert wrote:
Is there a set of bytes at some offset in a block that is common to any
instance of a BSD ufs filesystem? I ask because recently my home
machine erased it's fdisk block _and_ the bsdlabel with it. It
certainly didn't have time to erase the whole
On -1 xxx -1, Nielsen wrote:
When I change IP addresses on my 'em' gigabit NIC, ARP isn't sent
properly. This appears to be the problem in the following bug report,
however i'm using the 'fixed' version of the em driver (in FreeBSD 4.9).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54488
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Mark Linimon wrote:
If nothing happens, vinum is going to break even more very soon.
No ... if you do a commit that changes the code assumptions upon which
vinum was built, vinum will break. vinum is not going to magically
break by itself.
This gets back to a
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Danny Braniss wrote:
while the subject is being revived, there are some changes/additions I
made to libstand/bootp.c, it exports all the dhcp tags so that they are
available to rc.diskless? or rc.d/initdiskless via kenv check out
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
With attached patch unloading md(4) module is possible. It also cleans
up big part of code according to style(9).
Could you separate this into a functional diff and a style diff? There's
a general preference to not combine them, as it means
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
I'm trying to set up a VIA C3-based mini-ITX box for diskless boot using
isc-dhcpd 3.0 from ports. The kernel and modules load fine, but
isc-dhcpd doesn't seem to answer the kernel's DHCP discover message.
The following is a tcpdump of the
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you send tcpdump -e output?
22:18:14.884745 0:40:63:c4:60:3d ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0800 590: 0.0.0.0.68
255.255.255.255.67: xid:0x64c4603d secs:4 flags:0x8000 [|bootp]
22:18:16.911162 0:40:63:c4:60
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
I'll try again without the BOOTP options...
Yeah. Our PXE booting support isn't really the same as the traditional
diskless booting environment
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Scott Long wrote:
I started RAIDframe three years ago with the hope of bringing a proven
and extensible RAID stack to FreeBSD. Unfortunately, while it was made
to work pretty well on 4.x, it has never been viable on 5.x; it never
survived the introduction of GEOM and
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
[1] has core@ considered subversion (devel/subversion)?
Everyone has their eyes wide open looking for a revision control
alternative, but last time it was discussed in detail (a few months ago?)
it seemed there still wasn't a viable alternative.
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Adil Katchi wrote:
Unfortunately, newgrp(1) would not work, because it calls setgroups,
which for some weird reason, needs the caller to be a superuser. Isn't
there a function that sets the groups (like setgroups) of the current
process where you don't have to be a
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Paul Robinson wrote:
And therein lies a problem. The only thing any of the committers cares
about is what they think. Got a problem? Submit a patch. Don't like the
way things are done? Submit a patch. Don't like how such-and-such a util
works? Submit a patch.
While it's
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, William Michael Grim wrote:
I have 5.1-RELEASE installed on my system, and I've never needed to do a
pciconf -lv to probe the system before. However, I tried doing it
earlier today after logging in through SSH and doing su - to become
superuser. I received this error:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
History is in PR 32677. I do think your patch might be ok if it only
applies to the -l case. If so, then it should probably be committed and
MFC'd (along with the kernel pci_user.c change) so the PR can be closed.
Well, this patch changes only the
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:12:08 -0500 (EST)
Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can somebody please review/commit this to freebsd? it is most of the
differences to permit openbsd to use the code. it should not change
the code in any
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:12:08 -0500 (EST)
Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can somebody please review/commit this to freebsd? it is most of the
differences to permit openbsd to use
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:46:52PM +0100, Bogdan TARU wrote:
Right now I am considering a setup with one common NFS repository for
the configuration files, Apache binaries, Web content and temp
directory for PHP, NFS resource which will be
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, paul van den bergen wrote:
on freebsd-hackers, Alfred Perlstein posted a method that allows
boot-disk-less installation... but it requires mdconfig, a 5.1
utility...
is there a method to do this under 4.8?
it seems to me that the job performed by md0 could be done
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 10), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have a server with 1GB of RAM and a swap partition of 2GB i will
upgrade the memory server to 2GB so my questions are:
should i fix the swap partition to have now 4GB of space ?
Depends.
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Anand Subramanian wrote:
A look at the copyin() code in the kernel reveals that all the kernel
needs to do to access the data(address space) of a user process is
Note that the copyin/copyout implementat is machine-dependent (MD) and so
while this is true on i386, it may
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Mathew Kanner wrote:
On Dec 07, Mathew Kanner wrote:
The way I see it, FreeBSD needs serious hacking to have
multiple concurrent keyboards support without serious hacking.
ugh, you know what I mean.
With mouse support, we have a layer of indirection with
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Devon H.O'Dell wrote:
This is obviously the most logical explanation. There's a good bit of
questioning for PFIL_HOOKS to be enabled in generic to allow ipf to be
loaded as a module as well. If this is the case, we'll have two
firewalls that have their hooks compiled in
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
What I've thinking about a lot is to make the networking system and
ifconfig sort of class-based like newbus and geom.
Look at:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 02:20:50PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
if_type seems like it will work for high level classes of interfaces, but
something more fine-grained will be required for interfaces that implement
multiple classes or subclasses
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Anthony Schneider wrote:
sadly, all ktrace shows is ktrace launching vmware (from 'ktrace
vmware', shows sh reading and executing, and then ends with the vmware
fork).
is there a special way to ktrace linux binaries that i'm not aware of?
ktrace should work fine, but
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Len Sassaman wrote:
It is my intuition from this behavior that the sshd master process
listening for connections is unable to spawn a new process to complete
the authentication step, and thus the connection is being dropped. There
is no information of use in dmesg, nor
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:56:08AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
Hmm. Well, it certainly sounds like a resource limit to me, especially if
it's a nice round number like 150 or 300.
One possibility might be running out of pseudo-terminals to support
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Jin Guojun [NCS] wrote:
A KLD module ncs_time_ctl.ko compiled on both 4.8 and 4.9 hosts can be
loaded by kldload on any 4.8 machine. But neither .ko files can be
loaded on a 4.9 machine. The error is:
4.9 # kldload -v ./ncs_time_ctl.ko
kldload: can't load
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Jerry Toung wrote:
I am trying to do asynchronous send/receive between a user process that
I am writing and a kernel module that I am also writing. I thought
about implementing something similar to unix routing socket, but I will
have to define a new domain and protosw.
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote:
As to worker kthreads I think it's better to queue aio operation as it
was made in src/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c:aio_qphysio().
One of the things that worries me about the proposal to use kernel worker
threads to perform the I/O is that this can place a fairly
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote:
As to worker kthreads I think it's better to queue aio operation as it
was made in src/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c:aio_qphysio().
One of the things that worries me
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Hiten Pandya wrote:
Thank you very very much! ;-)
Atlast, someone got to it. I have been wanting to setup LXR for
DragonFly for quite some time now, but did not have enough time
on my hands to mess with it. Does it require any sort of
In the past when browsing the Linux source code, I've made extensive use
of the Linux Cross-Reference (LXR) hosted at lxr.linux.no. This web site
provides a cross-referenced and searchable HTML interface to the Linux
source code; you can perform freetext and identifier searches, check
FYI, lxr's C parsing code appears to dislike some of our C constructs. I
haven't had a chance to dig in much yet, but this is a warning that there
are some glitches (for example, kern_prot.c seems to be improperly parsed
in RELENG_4). Also, the identifier database seems somewhat prone to
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote:
It's a lot easier lockup path then the direction 5.x is going, and
a whole lot more maintainable IMHO because most of the coding doesn't
have to worry about mutexes or LORs or anything like that.
You still have to be pretty careful,
(Subject changed to reflect the fact that it contains useful technical
content and banter, resulting in a hijacking of the thread; hope no one
minds)
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Yes. I'm not worried about BPF, and ucred is easy since it is
already 95% of the way there,
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
I keep getting these panics on my SMP box (no backtrace or DDB or crash
dump of course, because panic() == hang to FreeBSD these days): panic:
receive: m == 0 so-so_rcv.sb_cc == 52 From what I can tell, all sorts
of socket-related calls
If one of you has had a chance to test this properly, please go ahead and
commit. I don't have remote -STABLE development boxes, so haven't been
able to do any -STABLE merging since I went to BSDCon. I did get RE
permission to MFC this change.
FYI, I have a bunch more related changes in a patch
This is just a friendly reminder e-mail that the BSD Conference is taking
place in San Mateo next week, and that if you're planning to attend and
haven't yet registered, you might want to. Or, just turn up and register
at the door.
There's a really strong lineup of FreeBSD-related papers,
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Denis Troshin wrote:
Almost every package I install requires a few other packages. This 'idea
of using dependent packages' turns FreeBSD (and other unix-systems) to
an ugly monster.
For example, I don't need Perl or Python but a few packages I install
require them.
As has been mentioned, the FreeBSD source tree as shipped isn't configured
for minimization without a fair amount of effort. However, there are a
number of larger components, typically maintained by third parties, that
are build-time removable, and are typically arguments to the build
specified
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Brian Reichert wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:26:10AM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
One way to do this initially is to install a full FreeBSD system on one
disk partition and use a second partition for a trial install. FreeBSD's
boot manager will let you boot into
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Markus Paluschek wrote:
I have Compaq Proliant Server with 2 Pentium Xeon IV 2,4GHz processors.
After installing FreeBSD-5.1, upgrading to FreeBSD-5.1-p2 by cvsup and
recompiling kernel with SMP support I;ve download ircd-hybrid-7 sources
and installed on user account
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:48:57PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
+ Bruce M Simpson wrote:
+ Whatever next? PCI-over-IP?
+ Collecting cheap on board serial lines to make a big terminal server
+ makes sense to me :)
+
+ BTW, Pawel's stuff would
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Steven Hartland wrote:
I've created a patch for the linux emulation which adds a dummy for the
exit_group syscall along with defining all functions up to 252 this
fixes a crash in the BattleField 1942 server. How do I go about getting
this into the various FreeBSD
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Ted Unangst wrote:
My advisor Dawson Engler has written a deadlock detector, and we'd like
some verification. They look like bugs, unless there is some other
reason why two call chains cannot happen at the same time.
Neat -- sounds like two good catches given the
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
Perhaps I'm not understanding you right but I think Pawel's idea is
cool. It seems to fulfill your requirements (except being network
specific). I suppose if it were network specific we could optimize it
for packet streams and if we made it
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
Of these approaches, my favorite are writing directly to a file, and using
a psuedo-device, depending on the requirements. They have fairly
well-defined security semantics (especially if you properly cache the
open-time
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
For example syscall is marking some range with mark() function. For now
on this range isn't accessable from userland. If process will try to
write to this page, page is copied (copy-on-write). If this page will
be modified by kernel it will
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Your choices are:
- device,
- sysctl,
- syscall.
There are actually a few other more obscure ways to push information from
the kernel to userspace, depending on what you want to accomplish.
Write directly to a file from the kernel. ktrace,
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Josh Brooks wrote:
I have loaded two 5.1-RELEASE systems, both of them have PROCFS and
PSEUDOFS in the kernel, and yet neither of them have a procfs mounted.
There is no procfs line in /etc/fstab by default, and no procfs is
mounted on the system in any way.
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wrote:
I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ...
Well, all I did was test your
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Josh Brooks wrote:
Normally, quotas work on a per-user, per-filesystem basis - so if a user
has a home directory and other processes _not owned by that user_ are
placing files and using up space into that directory, it will not count
toward the quota (unless they
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Socketd wrote:
I just installed FreeBSD 5.1 release and ran a find / -perm +4000 and
find / -perm +2000. My question is: are any of these files used by the
system, in a way that prevents me from making them non-executable to the
world? I have no shell users and don't
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
Is there any reason why struct ipc_perm is not protected by #ifdef _KERNEL
in ipc.h? Is it supposed to be used from userland?
It's needed by ipcs.
Ah, I see. It is visible via struct msqid_ds.
I developed a patch which requires
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
I'm writing a little application that needs to watch a file that another
process is writing to, think 'tail -F'. kqueue and kevent are going to
do it for me on *BSD, but I'm also trying to support *cough* linux and
other UN*X types OSes.
From
:53:53 -0500 (EST)
From: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Jdk13/14 still hangs in 4.8 Prerelease. Outstanding Fix need (fwd)
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Martin Blapp wrote:
Basically, it changes p31b_proc() to not always return an error for
non-root
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Kevin Fogleman wrote:
Is there an existing way to monitor the entire filesystem for changes to
any file, particularly changes in extended attributes?
I'm looking to write a program that builds an index of all
user-accessable extended attributes for every file in the
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
I have prepared patch for jail functionality against FreeBSD
5.0-CURRENT. It provides multi-level jailing and multiple ips for
jails.
Sounds cool, although I haven't had a chance to read the patch yet.
Question: how did you handle the problem
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Sam Tannous wrote:
I have two freebsd boxes (back to back) and I've been playing with a
simple server on one machine and client on the other machine (this was
simply an exercise with playing with kqueue). Both the server and the
client are single processes and the
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Experimenting with 'mount' and stumbled across the following oddity:
mount -t procfs proc /mnt
umount -t /mnt
You're missing the proc after -t here, right?
results in procfs still mounted on /mnt but no longer mounted on /proc.
It appears that
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, joe mcguckin wrote:
Are there any strange interactions between NFS and filesystems that are
not UFS? E.g. UFS2? Does NFS support new features that these fs's may
implement?
NFS can represent many but not all of the services found in UFS1 and UFS2.
Among things it
BTW, if this bug exists in 5.0 for the same reasons (or even different
ones), we should try to generate a fix ASAP and get it committed.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Ian Dowse
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Marco Molteni wrote:
as you might know, both kde (via kio-fish) and gnome (via gnome virtual
file system) provide a userland filesystem-like API that allows to
mount a remote filesystem using ssh. What I don't like about those
solutions is that they require the
A commit was made to correct the KSE crash shortly after 5.0-RC1. You can
cvsup forward to a newer revision, or wait for RC2.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, ouyang kai wrote:
Hi,
401 - 500 of 745 matches
Mail list logo
