craig wrote:
I know PIII can support 64G physical memory. In FreeBSD how can I visit such
range memory(4G-64G) ?
The short answer is you can't.
The longer answer is that you end up having to window it using
segmentation; if you are familiar with the 4k window on video
memory in the TI
Joseph Gleason wrote:
Alright, I made a mistake. But I did read the man page. Where does it say
off_t is 64bits?
The same place it says char is 8 bits, short is 16 bits, and int
and long are 32 bits: in your assumptions.
It might be useful (for some definitions of useful) to have a
man page
Chirag Kantharia wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 11:25:40PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
| Uh, st_size is an off_t, which is a signed 64 bit value,
| not an unsigned 32 bit vale...
going off-topic why should it be `signed' 64 bit and not unsigned?
Return value for lseek is off_t. -1
mark tinguely wrote:
Also, the PIII CAN'T natively support more than 4GB of ram. If a
particular PIII motherboard supports this, then it's using some kind of
wierd chipset that allows this to happen. 4GB is the limit with a 32 bit
chip I believe; and the PIII is a 32-bit chip.
John Baldwin wrote:
Err. hang on. This has zero to do with segmentation. Zip, nada.
PAE is completely in the paging side of things. No matter what
fun games you play with segmentation, you still end up with a
32-bit linear address that gets handed off to the paging translations.
PAE just
Rik van Riel wrote:
[ ... 4G on 32 bit macines ... ]
The short answer is you can't.
The longer answer is that you end up having to window it using
segmentation;
Only if you want to use it all within one process.
No. It still bites you if you want to do IPC, etc., since you
can not
Rik van Riel wrote:
Only if you want to use it all within one process.
No. It still bites you if you want to do IPC, etc., since you
can not guarantee the structures used for this are all within
the non-segmented region of memory.
Wrong. Your process can have pages from all over
Rik van Riel wrote:
BUT, don't the motherboards also have to support this? And isn't
it only supported through some wierd segmentation thing?
Yes, the mainboard needs to support the memory.
No, there is no weird segmentation thing, at least
not visible from software.
Last time I
Julian Elischer wrote:
No
The space is linear in physical space and if you have PCI/64
capable devices they can access it all too.
(In fact 64 bit addresses have been supported even in 32 bit wide PCI
since day 1).
It's been my experience that the TIGON cards take a 32 bit
DMA target
Charles Randall wrote:
From: Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I have yet to see one person using it for anything. So far,
it is nothing more than marketing fodder: I haven't seen one
motherboard capable of more than 4G worth of SIMMs.
The Dell PowerEdge 6450 supports 8 GB of RAM
Nate Dannenberg wrote:
I'd be glad to, however I no longer run FreeBSD. I have since switched to
Linux.
[ ... ]
Not being much of a C programmer
anymore I can't really say for certain though :)
Are these two statements related by cause and effect?
8-) 8-)
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send
Rik van Riel wrote:
This is a trivial implementation. I'm not very impressed.
Personally, I'm not interested in a huge user space,
Maybe not you, but I bet the database and scientific
computing people will be interested in having 64 GB
memory support in this simple way.
You mean 4G,
Alexander Litvin wrote:
As for bind9 -- this has AFAIK totally rewritten resolver,
which doesn't even resemble bind8. IMHO, to incorporate
it into FreeBSD might take a tremendous effort.
Not really.
Just import it on a vendor branch as /usr/src/lib/libresolv,
and then things that want it can
Matt Dillon wrote:
Yes, that is precisely the reason. In -current this all changes, though,
since interrupts are now threads. *But*, that said, interrupts cannot
really afford to hold mutexes that might end up blocking them for
long periods of time so I would still recommend
Jeff Behl wrote:
please excuse and direct me to the right place if this isn't the appropriate
place to post this sort of question
we're looking into moving to freebsd (yea!), but found the following
problem. It seems that the shortest amount of time the below code will
sleep for is 20
Bosko Milekic wrote:
I keep wondering about the sagicity of running interrupts in
threads... it still seems like an incredibly bad idea to me.
I guess my major problem with this is that by running in
threads, it's made it nearly impossibly to avoid receiver
livelock situations, using
Mike Smith wrote:
It also has the unfortunate property of locking us into virtual
wire mode, when in fact Microsoft demonstrated that wiring down
interrupts to particular CPUs was good practice, in terms of
assuring best performance. Specifically, running in virtual
wire mode means
Matt Dillon wrote:
:What this, exactly?
:
:That virtual wire mode is actually a bad idea for some
:applications -- specifically, high speed networking with
:multiple gigabit ethernet cards?
All the cpu's don't get the interrupt, only one does.
I think that you will end up taking an
Zach Brown wrote:
That Microsoft demonstrated that wiring down interrupts
to a particular CPU was a good idea, and kicked both Linux'
and FreeBSD's butt in the test at ZD Labs?
No, Terry, this is not what was demonstrated by those tests. Will this
myth never die? Do Mike and I have to
Julian Elischer wrote:
the kernel stack is a VERY LIMITED resource
basically you have about 4 or 5 Kbytes per process.
if you overflow it you write over your signal information..
you should MALLOC space and use a pointer to it..
Would adding an unmapped or read-only guard page be
void wrote:
Can you name one SMP OS implementation that uses an
interrupt threads approach that doesn't hit a scaling
wall at 4 (or fewer) CPUs, due to heavier weight thread
context switch overhead?
Solaris, if I remember my Vahalia book correctly (isn't that a favorite
of yours?).
Julian Elischer wrote:
Who is the expert on apache, modules and shlibs?
(I'll go offline to discuss the problem if I can find
an appropriate person.. (can't get ldap module to work with apache
under freebsd.)
Build Apache from your own sources, and not from ports.
You will also need to use
Mike Smith wrote:
Terry; all this thinking you're doing is *really*bad*.
I appreciate that you believe you're trying to educate us somehow. But
what you're really doing right now is filling our list archives with
convincing-sounding crap. People that are curious about this issue are
Brian O'Shea wrote:
On this machine I run a program which simulates many (~150) simultaneous
TCP clients. This is actually a multithreaded Linux binary, and one
thread per simulated TCP client is created. After a few seconds the
system runs out of mbuf clusters:
# netstat -m
craig wrote:
In general a address in a process is just a linear address which
refer to physical address indirectly by page directory.
Or a virtual address that does not have a physical page behind
it. Some kernel memory is swappable, and some is overcommitted,
and the pages backing the page
Rolf Neugebauer wrote:
NB. for achieving higher timer resolutions you might find it
interesting to look at Soft-Timers at Rice [2]. Events are scheduled
at the usual timer interrupt frequency but the time wheels are also
checked at system-call and other interrupt times, thus, depending on
Weiguang SHI wrote:
I found an article on livelock at
http://www.research.compaq.com/wrl/people/mogul/mogulpubsextern.html
Just go there and search for livelock.
But I don't agree with Terry about the interrupt-thread-is-bad
thing, because, if I read it correctly, the authors
Greg Lehey wrote:
Solaris hits the wall a little later, but it still hits the
wall.
Every SMP system experiences performance degradation at some point.
The question is a matter of the extent.
IMO, 16 processors is not unreasonable, even with standard APIC
based SMP. 32 is out of the
smail wrote:
Hello freebsd-hackers,
i need some help. my problem is about memory limit in mmap function.
i can't mmap files infinitely, after some number of file mmaped in
memory i've got an error, probably causing memory limit of 2 or 4 Gb.
can you help me? my platform is FreeBSD
Mike Smith wrote:
The basic problem here is that you have decided what interrupt threads
are, and aren't interested in the fact that what FreeBSD calls interrupt
threads are not the same thing, despite being told this countless times,
and despite it being embodied in the code that's right
John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
Prototypes are an overwhelmingly Good Thing(tm)
as behind-your-back implicit parameter conversion is death to serious
numerical work. At least now, some control can be exercised over
parameter
conversions . . .
Who ever said anything about not
Rohit Grover wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Dima Dorfman wrote:
Rohit Grover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interestingly, when I executed the command 'make depend',
vnode_if.h was correctly created for me. I'd like to know why I don't
need to do a 'make depend' for modules like 'vn' or
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 11:46:57AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote:
Another point:
Can we '#define MTEOM MTEOD' as MTEOM is used on NetBSD and Solaris?
End of Message is not the same as End of Data for some
drives; this could break old 8-track
Daniel M. Eischen wrote:
We don't provide locking for fd's any longer (I thought this was only in
-current, but your results seem to indicate otherwise). If we did, only
one thread would wake up. The mistake in your sample seems to be that
you're having all threads block on the same fd.
Hans Zaunere wrote:
I'm sorry that this is offtopic, but I've looked/asked
everywhere and no one has a clue.
Once a program does initscr(), is it possible to
printf()? I can printf() stuff without a problem, but
it doesn't get to the screen until the program exits?
I've done every
Joe Clarke wrote:
I'm trying to write a packet alias translator for a protocol that uses TCP
to setup a UDP streaming session (much like the smedia driver that's
already there). I'm having a problem getting the translated port to mesh
with the actual port. Here's what I've done:
/* msg
Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
I'm observing some strange problem when I have an IP address on one card
on a bridge machine and want to telnet in. I have 4.2-RELEASE box with
two network cards: Realtek 8139 (rl0) and 3Com 3C905B (xl0). rl0 is connected
to the world, and xl0 to the intranet switch.
David O'Brien wrote:
If gcc team wants to implement proper
alignment to work with SSE and other high-specialized stuff,
they should learn commands for bitwise AND, and use only where
really needed.
Perhaps you'd like to send your patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps you'd like to
Ronald G Minnich wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
I/O space is easy, but memory space is hard. Userspace access to
physical memory is a big no-no in the *nix world.
I want to disagree just a bit. If you look at myrinet, or the many fpga
cards, it's the standard modus
John Baldwin wrote:
Well, now you should add wanted options to /etc/make.conf and avoid
seeing of such nightmares.
Erm, the original topic of this dicussion was about attempting to use the
assembly from the C compiler to see how things work when writing one's own
assembly functions.
Mark D. Anderson wrote:
This may not work.
...
Some of those compilers
would NOT let you '#ifdef' out the version that it did not recognize
(perhaps thinking that '#warn' or '#warning' might be some gross typo
for '#else' or '#endif', I guess...).
this is true; some compilers seem
Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
You probably have the system default libstdc++.so.3 in your library search
path before the GCC 3 libstdc++.so.3. Try setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the
GCC 3 lib directory.
NOTE:
If you are using the FreeBSD .mk files to build this, and you
are setting DESTDIR, you can
Deepak Jain wrote:
We've got a customer running a FreeBSD router with 2 x 1GE interfaces [ti0
and ti1]. At no point was bandwidth an issue.
The router was under some kind of ICMP attack:
For about 30 minutes:
icmp-response bandwidth limit 96304/200 pps
I've seen this happen in a lab
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
What is the file system that uses VT_TFS in vnode.h? Is it still available
on FreeBSD? Thanks.
Julian added it for TRW Financial Services; the first public
reference machine for 386BSD (which later became FreeBSD and
NetBSD) was ref.tfs.com. TRW supported a lot of the
Evan Sarmiento wrote:
Hey,
I have a question about sysent. If a modification
to a processes p-p_sysent and associated substructures
are made, are the changes propagated through fork
to children?
Yes, for fork().
You probably wanted to ask about exec(), though... the answer
for exec()
Faried Nawaz wrote:
Next: the OSS plugin builds but doesn't seem to work properly. At
some point, it tries to set /dev/dsp to stereo, and fails:
tmp = 0;
if (shm-channels == 2)
tmp = 1;
rc = ioctl (audio_fd, SNDCTL_DSP_STEREO, tmp);
if (rc
David O'Brien wrote:
Hi Hackers, et.al.
The PIM Evolution, http://www.ximian.com/products/ximian_evolution/,
does not run on FreeBSD. The authors have made a change so that it will.
However, we would like to know if FreeBSD is the odd-man-out, or if the
authors were lucky Evolution ran
Did you have opportunity to play with the soft interrupt
coalescing we discussed?
I was able to remove a third of the interrupt overhead
from the Tigon III driver, using the approach we discussed
at the user group meeting two months back.
It looks to be a serious win... and it appears to be
David O'Brien wrote:
Well, since it didn't, I might as well explain the problem here too.
There are at least two major problems with VIA chips:
[data curruption on VIA KT133/133A systems by pushing PCI and memory bus]
Are you sure about that?
I am. I was having data coruption in
Vladimir A. Jakovenko wrote:
Hello!
According to UNPv1 SO_REUSEPORT on UDP sockets can be used to bind more than
one socket to the same port (even with same source ip address). But quick
look on /sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c function udp_input() shows that this will
work as expected
Julian Elischer wrote:
What is the file system that uses VT_TFS in vnode.h? Is it
still available on FreeBSD? Thanks.
Julian added it for TRW Financial Services; the first public
reference machine for 386BSD (which later became FreeBSD and
NetBSD) was ref.tfs.com. TRW supported a
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Did you have opportunity to play with the soft interrupt
coalescing we discussed?
Did this message just leak to a mailing list, or would you
be able to expand this (or pass a pointer to mailing lists
where this was discussed) ?
Ignore the man behind the curtain...
Steve Roome wrote:
Can these newer drives, based on the IC-35L0?0-chipset, also be used
with TCQ enabled in FBSD? (? is 2, 4 or 6 depending on whether the
drive has 20, 40 or 60 GB capacity).
I've got one of these :
ad0: 39266MB IC35L040AVER07-0 [79780/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66
Nate Williams wrote:
TRW supported a lot of the early
386BSD/FreeBSD effort, back before Walnut Creek CDROM threw
in and had us change the version number from 0.1 to 1.0 to
make it a bit easier to sell.
*Huh* That's revisionist history if I've ever heard it. We
did a 1.0 release for
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Nate,
You're replying to Terry for christs sake! What did you expect if not
revisionist $anything ?
Which reminds me, Adrian still oves us his story about ref :-)
Poul, you're going off again, without regard for facts.
Remember the last time FreeBSD history
Nate Williams wrote:
Bill Jolitz approved a 0.5 interim release of 386BSD
And then Lynn revoked this, and posted a public message to the world
stating what obnoxious fiends we were.
Actually, Lynne didn't have the right to do this; the trademark
was Bill's, so the revocation wasn't valid
Nate Williams wrote:
You're not the only pack-rat around here. Be careful of your claims,
since they could come back to bite you.
I'm willing to be bitten in public, if I'm wrong... always have
been. ;-).
ps. I still have my phone-logs of my conversations with Bill as well. ;)
Now I'm
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
*I* worked at TFS, I even kept ref.tfs.com alive after Julian went AWOL.
I'm well aware of your checkered past... 8-).
I guess Julian might pipe up now about the use of the acronym
AWOL...
Now, remind me again why historians are so picky about primary
sources and
Igor Podlesny wrote:
I noticed that some mailers (sendmail, postfix) in case they allow
relayingforsomedomain.zonealsoallowrelayingfor
subdomain-of.somedomain.zone.
I can accept this as reasonable behavior but would like to know how to
deny it! :) Also I wish to
John Polstra wrote:
CVS claims to support multiple vendor branches, but in practice it
doesn't work in any useful sense. There's at least one place in the
CVS sources where the vendor branch is hard-coded as 1.1.1. You
really don't want to use multiple vendor branches -- trust me. :-)
Use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to create threads under HP-UX 11 using POSIX threads library and
using the method pthread_create(...).
But I don't know how can I create a thread in a suspended state.
First the obligatory off topic humor:
This is not the place to ask about
Nate Williams wrote:
I guess I'll ask the usual question:
Any chance of getting CVSup to transfer from a remote repository
to a local vendor branch, instead of from a remote repository to
a local repository?
The problem is that you aren't just transferring bits from the HEAD, but
John Polstra wrote:
No, Terry's idea is sound as long as you only try to track one branch
of FreeBSD. I.e., you consider FreeBSD to be your vendor, and you do
a checkout-mode type of fetch from a branch of the FreeBSD repository
and directly import it onto your own vendor branch. This would
Mike Silbersack wrote:
Similarly, there are a number of bugs in the TCP sockets as
well; specifically, there's a problem with all sockets being
treated as being in the same collision domain, when doing
automatic port assignment. This limits you to 65535 oubound
TCP connections, even
John Baldwin wrote:
If the intent is to have a pool of idle threads, ready to
go when you get request traffic, and get around the latency,
well, you'd do a lot better in the latency department if you
went to a finite state automaton, instead of messing with
threads. But if you insist,
Igor Podlesny wrote:
Yes, I saw this info here:
http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#relay_mail_frombut most
valuable part of my question was about the purpose or the idea behind
this, cause it's not too clear to me why allowing relaying
Igor Podlesny wrote:
Now it's all clear :) and I understand that it was just a way
SENDMAIL's is configured. Another question could be why not to use
syntax .foo.bar instead of foo.bar but I'm quite ready to call it a
rhetorical one ;-)) (regexps are also there ;-)
The
Robert Watson wrote:
Submissions are due this afternoon. Please submit by e-mail ASAP. We're
currently substantially behind prior months -- this is in some ways
expected due to various people on summer vacations in the Northern
Hemisphere, but it would be nice to get things a bit more
Vladimir A. Jakovenko wrote:
Terry, I clearly understand all your explanations. Yes, we are living in
real life and there is a lot of programms with bad design.
But all what I want is possibility to receive UDP packets with
corresponding dst IP and port by more than one process on a single
Jason Andresen wrote:
Are you using XFree 4.x? What video cards are in both boxes?
Are they the same box just dual booting? I've found that XFree
3.x is a processor pig on my system, but XFree 4.x is nice and
light, particularly with Xv.
I'll echo the 3.x vs. 4.x observation.
Sometimes
Ah. Interesting bug; perhaps related to a similar experience
of my own... so let's stare at it!
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
I am debugging a KLD and I have got the following panic inside an
interrupt context:
fault virutal address = 0x1080050
...
interrupt mask = bio
kernel trap: type 12,
Josef Karthauser wrote:
Hi!
I just wonder if all freebsd developers are ok, due the wtc attack?
We believe so.
Has anyone talked to Loqui Chen since the the event?
Loqui was a financial person in New York at one time,
and made significant contributions in the VM system, the
Soft
Mike Smith wrote:
Having said that, I recommend using __attribute__ ((packed))
to explicitly request that a structure be packed.
Is there a problem with #pragma pack(1)? I see it in a
lot of header files... do they need changing?
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Sansonetti Laurent wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to store a function in kernel memory using KVM interface ?
I have written a tty spy'er, which simply hijack discipline line entries for
a tty, and as you know probably, those routines must be situated in kernel
land.
I know that I should
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have written a server program that listens on port 3000. The program
works very well except for one feature. I am asking if that is normal,
or whether I forgot something.
If I run the program it does fine. If I then kill the program (after it
has
Tim Allshorn wrote:
Hello.
I need to be able to run a particular program at the last
minute of each month and yes I know it would be much easier to
run it at the first minute of each month, but my hands are tied
and my brain is too puny to work it out.
1) Run it the first minute
Rasputin wrote:
Thnaks a lot for the confirmation - for the record, I'm trying
to replace a basestation, not communicate with one.
The timing for access points requires different firmware; you
can't do it in software alone.
Talk to Julian Elisher; he presented on a company that sells
a
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
I imagine that this was done to follow alignment constraints on
non-i386 platforms where having the ip header misaligned is fatal.
(the tulip is not capable of byte granularity DMA, so you can't
intentionally misalign the ethernet header end up with an aligned IP
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
I disagree with this code; the elemenets in the header
are referenced multiple times. If you are doing the
checksum check, you might as well be relocating the data,
as well. The change I would make would be to integrate
the checksum calculation with the
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I probably missed some emails ?
In any case i was only concerned about the additional copy
done by m_devget when the controller can already DMA into
an mbuf, and there are no alignment constraints.
I guess we are talking about a protocol other than IP? The
ethernet
David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 06:35:27AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
Especially the empty line after the copyright message:
Agreed.
__FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/lib/libatm/atm_addr.c,v 1.6 2001/09/15 19:36:55 dillon
Exp $);
What about changing this to __FBSD(), which is
Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
I'm just curious: is it possible to set up an NFS server and a client
where the client has very big (28 GB maximum for FreeBSD?) swap area on
multiple disks and caches the NFS exported data on it?
This could save a lot of bandwidth on the NFS server and also
Brian Reichert wrote:
/*
* Yuck! The directory has been modified on the
* server. The only way to get the block is by
* reading from the beginning to get all the
*
Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
Unfortunately, it can not correctly interoperate with a
number of cards in jumbogram mode, so unless you know the
card on the other end and manually configure it (it can't
negotiate properly), you can't really use jumbograms. Or
you could rewrite the firmware
Bill Paul wrote:
It is possible for a driver
to load a custom image into the NIC's memory which will override the
auto-loaded one, and it's also possible to load a new image into
the EEPROM, however this requires an additional manual on top of
the BCM5700 driver developer's guide as well as
Bart Kus wrote:
If I do have to write something, for my work to be included anywhere, I
should be writing for the -CURRENT kernel, right? I presently run -STABLE,
so that would obviously be the more comfortable kernel to write for...but it
is *STABLE* after all.
Most of us doing commercial
Bakul Shah wrote:
Hrm, I was planning on investigating the RT capabilities of fbsd after
I got
myself a decent timer mechanism. I was hoping they would be enough to get
close to RT. I have an SMP system I can use, so 1 CPU can be dedicated to
the task.
I doubt even an SMP system
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
[ ... SIGDANGER ... ]
Well Joe seems to have provided a pretty interesting document on
how it works in AIX, but I was wondering if they do anything wrt
low/high watermarks like my idea.
Basically you'd like to inform processes that the danger has been
alliviated so
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Submissions should contain a -current version or they are likely
to never make it into the tree...
I guess this is why the Rice University code that more than
triples the TCP connection rate never made it in the first
time they released it for 2.2 and then again when
Dwayne wrote:
I'm creating an app where I want to use memory to store data so I
can get at it quickly. The problem is, I can't afford the delays that
would occur if the memory gets swapped out. Is there any way in FreeBSD
to allocate memory so that the VM system won't swap it out?
Julian Elischer wrote:
I need to take a directory of 'stuff'
which includes a script install.sh
and make it into a package..
I have had some success but it's not quite right..
What I'd like to make it do is:
unpack the 'stuff' into a temporary directory somewhere.
run the install
Oleg Golovanov wrote:
Dear Sirs:
I am using FreeBSD-2.2.8 and after calling pthread_create()
my programs get sigfault (SIGSEGV) and exited with core dump.
I should like to ask if somebody know the solve of this problem.
My example of using pthread is included below.
I ask to answer
This belongs on -questions...
Soweb_Ahfei wrote:
We have installed the Freebsd4.32 in our server.But we can not
reboot the system after we made an error configuration in the
file FSTAB.Now,we can not delete or rename the error file Fstab
and the system shown the file is read only.
We
Shoichi Sakane wrote:
While investigating a problem, I noticed that the IPSEC code
is initializing the sp -- even when no one is using IPSEC.
It turns out that this really, really bloats the per socket
memory requirements, with the only real result being a lot
of extra processing that
Jesús Arnáiz wrote:
Hi!
I want to install a cyphred partition on my system. I use FreeBSD, and I
want to know what software is avaivle in order to do it.
I heard about CFS and TCFS (but this is not still supported by FreeBSD), is
there any better bet? If anyone know any good resource
Joesh Juphland wrote:
You wouldn't happen to have a portmap_enable=NO line in your rc.conf,
would you?
No, I do not. Further, I see 'portmap' in the process list, so it is indeed
running.
ipfw add 1 allow all from any to any
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:39:57PM +0100, void wrote:
If syslogd used the kqueue interface, I believe it could open a new log
file as soon as it was created, rather than waiting to receive a signal.
Would this be worth doing, or would it be too big a divergence from
Mike Barcroft wrote:
I'm suggesting that the kill could be left out if syslogd got the same
smarts as tail -F.
I recommend using newsyslog(8) for rotating log files.
I recommend _NOT_ using newsyslog for rotating files.
The newsyslog program bit us on the ass numerous times at
Whistle,
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
Until newsyslog is fixed to not be able to stage a
denial of service attack against you, I really, really
recommend against its use.
Seems like it would be more user-friendly (to freebsd users
in general) to fix newsyslog, instead of just telling people
that they
Mike Silbersack wrote:
Also, if this happens again, what additional information could I grab so I
or others could (hopefully) successfully find the bug?
Many dynamic route related changes have been made since 4.2, your bug may
already be fixed. You should invest time in transitioning to
301 - 400 of 1638 matches
Mail list logo
