RE: libc_r/_read(), should the errno be reset to 0?

2000-06-23 Thread Bohne, Peter
This means that *you* should set errno to 0 just before you do the read call. At this point, you no longer care what it had been before. -- pete == pbohne at hboc dot com Peter Bohne -- McKessonHBOC -- Louisville, CO Work: 303-926-2218 -- Cell: 303-817-8312 -- Home Ofc: 970-586-9031 ==

RE: libc_r/_read(), should the errno be reset to 0?

2000-06-23 Thread Bohne, Peter
... :-) pete -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 9:49 AM To: Bohne, Peter Cc: FengYue; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: libc_r/_read(), should the errno be reset to 0? On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Bohne, Peter wrote

RE: libc_r/_read(), should the errno be reset to 0?

2000-06-23 Thread Bohne, Peter
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 10:25 AM To: Bohne, Peter Cc: FengYue; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: libc_r/_read(), should the errno be reset to 0? On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Bohne, Peter wrote: Anytime you make a call that can