-Original Message-
From: Dan Seguin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 1999 11:22 PM
To: Ladavac Marino
Cc: FreeBSD Hackers
Subject: RE: Connect and so on..
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Ladavac Marino wrote:
[ML] If I understand this correctly, only
-Original Message-
From: Alex Zepeda [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 4:43 AM
To: Chris Costello
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 'rtfm' script
P.S. If you're looking for an easy to use regexp implementation, and
aren't afraid of C++, check out
-Original Message-
From: Dan Seguin [SMTP:d...@texar.com]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 1999 11:22 PM
To: Ladavac Marino
Cc: FreeBSD Hackers
Subject: RE: Connect and so on..
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Ladavac Marino wrote:
[ML] If I understand this correctly, only
-Original Message-
From: Alex Zepeda [SMTP:garba...@hooked.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 4:43 AM
To: Chris Costello
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 'rtfm' script
P.S. If you're looking for an easy to use regexp implementation, and
aren't afraid of C++, check out
-Original Message-
From: Bill Fumerola [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 11:54 AM
To: David O'Brien
Cc: Bill Fumerola; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tcpdump(1) additions.
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
Hmmm.. but a non-superuser
-Original Message-
From: Bill Fumerola [SMTP:bi...@chc-chimes.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 11:54 AM
To: David O'Brien
Cc: Bill Fumerola; hack...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: tcpdump(1) additions.
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
Hmmm.. but a non-superuser
:
:All these situations seem to me are not handled by FreeBSD mmap()
code. I
:hope I am wrong. I also wonder why we can not add some information to
the
No machine's mmap() code handles these situations. It is a side
effect
of the way MMU's work and the way mmap() was defined -
Essentially, we're trying to mediate system calls. Read, Write, Open,
Socket calls from userland are caught, information about the calling
process (i.e. caller UID) are sent to an external source for
authorization and depending on the reply, the system call will proceed
or
not. This is the
Anyone out there in Vienna area using/hacking on FreeBSD?
How about a raid on Wiednerbrau this weekend?
/Marino
--
Marino Ladavac, Dipl.-Ing.Metropolitan Datenserviceges.m.b.H
e-mail: mlada...@metropolitan.at
GSM: +43 676 309 79 67
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
-Original Message-
From: Dan Seguin [SMTP:d...@texar.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 5:26 PM
To: Brian F. Feldman
Cc: FreeBSD Hackers
Subject: Re: Connect and so on..
As I said earlier in this post, I need to open a connection to the
outside
(presumably) from the
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Baker [SMTP:dba...@cuckoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 5:12 AM
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Typo: sys/pci/pcisupport.c
4.0-CURRENT: sys/pci/pcisupport.c:
955:/* VIA Technologies -- vendor 0x1106 /
956:
-Original Message-
From: Nick Hibma [SMTP:nick.hi...@jrc.it]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 2:27 PM
To: Ladavac Marino
Cc: FreeBSD hackers mailing list
Subject: RE: Typo: sys/pci/pcisupport.c
It does, just no one checking. Someone needs to go and fix warnings
again
-Original Message-
From: Tommy Hallgren [SMTP:thallg...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 1999 1:23 PM
To: Mike Smith; hack...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ZD labs test update
Isn't 16MB/s quite bad for this kind of system?
[ML] Figuring in the SCSI overhead, 16
-Original Message-
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav [SMTP:d...@flood.ping.uio.no]
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 1999 6:02 PM
To: Brian Feldman
Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav; hack...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: select(2) breakage
[ML] To the previous posters:
the port ranges are
-Original Message-
From: John S. Dyson [SMTP:dy...@iquest.net]
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 1999 6:58 PM
To: w...@softweyr.com
Cc: cro...@cs.rpi.edu; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: High syscall overhead?
Think of it like this: since alot of desktops sit in idle
-Original Message-
From: Jordan K. Hubbard [SMTP:j...@zippy.cdrom.com]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 1999 2:32 AM
Cc: Chuck Youse; Marc Ramirez; hack...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Variant symlinks [was Re: symlink question]
And have /usr/bin point to /binaries/i386/bin or
-Original Message-
From: Frederic [SMTP:y...@club-internet.fr]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 1999 1:35 AM
To: FreeBSD
Subject: Thanks
But but FreeBSD is not a version of Linux ! Right ?
[ML] FreeBSD can behave (almost) as Linux as far as Linux
binaries are concerned, but
-Original Message-
From: Frederic [SMTP:y...@club-internet.fr]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 1999 12:45 PM
To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: Sheldon Hearn
Subject: Re: Thanks
Sheldon Hearn a écrit:
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999 01:34:39 +0200, Frederic wrote:
I am know
Disadvantages:
- Unpacked ports will use about twice as much disk space (3 times if
you include the original CVS archive).
- ar(1) may need some tweaks to allow pathnames (not just filenames)
as object names (and maybe to create directories).
- Updating ports is not as easy (the port
-Original Message-
From: Nick Hibma [SMTP:nick.hi...@jrc.it]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 1999 2:05 PM
To: freebsd-po...@freebsd.org; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: a two-level port system? (fwd)
Folks, how about _admitting_ finally that our ports collection is a
-Original Message-
From: Taavi Talvik [SMTP:ta...@uninet.ee]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 1999 2:38 PM
To: Ladavac Marino
Cc: 'Nick Hibma'; freebsd-po...@freebsd.org;
freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: RE: a two-level port system? (fwd)
On Mon, 31 May 1999, Ladavac Marino
-Original Message-
From: Luigi Rizzo [SMTP:lu...@labinfo.iet.unipi.it]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 1999 12:39 PM
To: mlada...@metropolitan.at
Cc: ta...@uninet.ee; mlada...@metropolitan.at; nick.hi...@jrc.it;
freebsd-po...@freebsd.org; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: a
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Duros [SMTP:emmanuel.du...@sophia.inria.fr]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 1999 10:19 AM
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD 3.2 - new ifnet structure
The last FreeBSD release provides a new ifnet structure different from
the one in
-Original Message-
From: konstantinos.dryllera...@dg21.cec.be
[SMTP:konstantinos.dryllera...@dg21.cec.be]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 1999 11:15 AM
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; freebsd-quest...@freebsd.org
Subject: ipfw/natd limitation: controlling access of an
unregistered net
-Original Message-
From: Dom Mitchell [SMTP:dom.mitch...@palmerharvey.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 1999 11:20 AM
To: Graeme Tait
Cc: David Scheidt; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; i...@boatbooks.com
Subject: Re: File system gets too fragmented ???
It sounds like you've
-Original Message-
From: Mike Smith [SMTP:m...@smith.net.au]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 1999 6:05 PM
To: Ladavac Marino
Cc: 'Mike Smith'; Joel Ray Holveck; Doug Rabson; Peter Wemm; Tommy
Hallgren; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Lazy SPLs
For a simplistic bus
-Original Message-
From: Mike Smith [SMTP:m...@smith.net.au]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 1999 2:16 AM
To: Joel Ray Holveck
Cc: Doug Rabson; Peter Wemm; Tommy Hallgren;
freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Lazy SPLs
Why mask out the interrupts at all, instead of
-Original Message-
From: Joe Abley [SMTP:jab...@clear.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 1999 12:09 PM
To: Matthew Dillon
Cc: Joe McGuckin; hack...@freebsd.org; jab...@clear.co.nz
Subject: GPS receivers for xntpd (off-topic)
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 11:02:38PM -0700, Matthew
28 matches
Mail list logo
