A couple of things.
- The newer rt2661.c driver has not been MFC'd to 6.2. That is most
likely why your card is not working.
- 'ifconfig' when run as root will load the module for a network
driver provided it is a) in the path and b) name if_interface
name.ko
-Kip
I've got a Dell Dimension 4100 (circa 2000) running FreeBSD 6.2.
I plugged in a Linksys WMP54G wireless PCI card, which should
be supported by the 'ral' driver. However, my pciconf says:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0: class=0x028000 card=0x00551737 chip=0x03011814
rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
vendor
Well - I gave up on the ral(4) driver - seems it doesn't
support the WMP54Gv4.1 linksys card.
So - I've got ndis working.
I can ifconfig ndis0, set the ssid and wepkey, etc...
And - DHCP will get the wireless configured (IP address,
default route, etc...)
But - on the first packet after that
Forent Thoumie wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 23:05 -0500, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
I've got a Dell Dimension 4100 (circa 2000) running FreeBSD 6.2.
I plugged in a Linksys WMP54G wireless PCI card, which should
be supported by the 'ral' driver. However, my pciconf says:
[EMAIL
Randall Hyde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, if anyone is intrested in the full FLEX source, it's part of the HLA
(High Level Assembler) source package found here:
http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/AsmTools/HLA/HLAv1.84/hlasrc.zip
Just wondering if those guys knew that IBM calls their mainframe
I'm applying flock() to a file that is on an NFS server.
The program calling flock() is built on a 4.5 system,
with the 4.5 libraries, etc...
The NFS server is a 4.5-RELEASE system. The program running on a
4.5-release system doesn't display any problems.
But - when I run that same program
Everyone,
If I'm remembering correctly - the historical way to
do this is to alias the rm command to something that
else that checks the arguments and complains appropriately
(and then executes /bin/rm.) Typically with just a shell
alias. That keeps you from accidently doing something.
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Warner - any ideas?
: pci_write_config(..., bcr,2); hangs
Interesting
So this pretty much confirms what I'd expect. We establish the
interrupt
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: to the end of pcic_pci_intr() - but that didn't change anything...
: got the same hang in exactly the same place...
Sounds like we may need to do the more
OK - after *many* additional printf()s, and following the
control flow through several twisty passages (all alike),
I've figured out _where_ the hang is happening but, not
why...
First - the card is inserted, and the various callbacks occur...
pccardd gets involved and reads the CIS to
E.B. Dreger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all,
Eddy,
Instead of a system-specific approach, you might want
to take advantage of what the C language has to offer.
For example, your multi-line issue.
You realise that the C preprocessor/compiler will
concatentate adjacent
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Also - I need to understand why this machine worked so well with
: 4.1-RELEASE, and doesn't with 4.5-RELEASE. I'm guessing there
: was a significant change
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Ok - the next question would be - is there a way to un-do that?
: Since ISA interrupts worked before?
hw.pcic.intr_path=1 is supposed to do that.
Warner
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: OK -
:
: pccard (or, more likely, the pcic driver) hangs when I insert
: my ethernet card into the pcmcia slot on my VAIO F480 (with
: 4.5-RELEASE.)
:
: The entire machine is hung up
OK -
pccard (or, more likely, the pcic driver) hangs when I insert
my ethernet card into the pcmcia slot on my VAIO F480 (with
4.5-RELEASE.)
The entire machine is hung up tight.
When I remove the card, everything comes alive again
This clearly feels like a missed interrupt
Dear Thomas,
Well - I'm still trying to get pptp to cooperate and set up
a VPN connection to a Microsoft VPN server.
I'm just wondering - is there _anyone_ out there that has
met with success using pptp - and, if so, could you share
your /etc/ppp/ppp.conf settings?
Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 03:47:13PM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Well - I'm still trying to get pptp to cooperate and set up
a VPN connection to a Microsoft VPN server.
I'm just wondering - is there _anyone_ out there that has
met
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always had better success using the mpd port for pptp..
It's installed now :-) I'm going to try and give it a go this
morning!
I'll let everyone know how it goes...
- Thanks! -
- Dave Rivers -
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always had better success using the mpd port for pptp..
OK - I went through the mpd documentation, etc.. very nice.
No problems setting things up, etc...
However, mpd isn't working for me either. It makes it through
the authentication,
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
From the ppp.log file - it seems I have to have MSChapV2
both enabled and disabled at the same time. At some points
in the negotiation it needs to be disabled (i.e. *not* used
for authenticating the peer) - but at other points it needs
to be enabled
Thomas David Rivers writes:
If I add
enable MSChapV2
in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf - then our ppp client requires that the
peer (the Microsoft VPN server) authenticate using MSChapV2. But,
the Microsoft VPN peer refuses that (it's configured to not use
MSChapV2.
Don't you
Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas David Rivers writes:
enable MSChapV2
in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf - then our ppp client requires that the
peer (the Microsoft VPN server) authenticate using MSChapV2. But,
the Microsoft VPN peer refuses that (it's configured
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Thomas David Rivers writes:
If I add
enable MSChapV2
in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf - then our ppp client requires that the
peer (the Microsoft VPN server) authenticate using MSChapV2. But,
the Microsoft VPN peer
Well - I'm still trying to get pptp to cooperate and set up
a VPN connection to a Microsoft VPN server.
I'm just wondering - is there _anyone_ out there that has
met with success using pptp - and, if so, could you share
your /etc/ppp/ppp.conf settings?
- Many thanks! -
- Dave
Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Well - I'm still trying to get pptp to cooperate and set up
a VPN connection to a Microsoft VPN server.
I'm just wondering - is there _anyone_ out there that has
met with success using pptp - and, if so, could you share
Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 03:47:13PM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Well - I'm still trying to get pptp to cooperate and set up
a VPN connection to a Microsoft VPN server.
I'm just wondering - is there _anyone_ out there that has
met
I posted something on -questions, and got no reply... so, let me
try here...
Has _anyone_ been successfull at getting a pptp client connection
to a Microsoft VPN server?
I've - at last - gotten through two of the big hurdles, 1) Clearing
the firewall to allow this to pass and 2) Getting the
Theo Pagtzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I upgraded to linux 7.1 base successfully for the purposes of getting
linux java 1.4. The upgrade has created a consistent problem with the
locale for any application that I am running.
These applications are so far, Netscape and java 1.4
The machine I redirected telnet too has changed IP addresses...
And; I discovered after simply changing my natd_flags in /etc/rc.conf
that natd isn't properly redirecting the port.
I checked the messages log (/var/log/alias.log) and nothing appears
to be amiss.
(And, I've got -l on the
Hi,
I have written some code in C++. However, I want to run it on an old
mainframe machine, which a C++ compiler is not available.
I know that the old g++ is a C++ to C compiler. Does anyone know which
version it is? Also, anyone knows other C++ to C compilers?
Thanks,
Rayson
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:20:51AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
On 07-Jun-01 Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:07:22PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hi,
Is free((void *) (size_t) ptr) the only way to free a const whatever
GCC complains when I try to initialize the structure with something like:
struct validation_fun val_init[] = {
{init,valfun_init,0}
};
This can be avoided by:
struct validation_fun val_init[] = {
{(char *) (uintptr_t) init, valfun_init,0}
};
..but
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:51:54AM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
GCC complains when I try to initialize the structure with something like:
struct validation_fun val_init[] = {
{init,valfun_init,0}
};
This can be avoided by:
struct
Since some strings are non-constant (the are allocated) - I believe
the `const' qualifier in the structure declaration is incorrect.
'const' just means I will not be modifying this; it's a way for a
function prototype to constrain the function's implementation.
Yes - it is..
Long shot, probably, but I've got a bunch of virtual machines on an IBM
S/390 mainframe, and while we're running SuSE Linux on most of them, on a
whim I tossed out the idea of running FreeBSD on one of them, and to my
surprise, it was taken seriously.
So, has anyone done any work with
Farooq Mela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Usually when I write programs, I have functions such as the following:
void *
xmalloc(size_t size)
{
nice code
}
void *
xrealloc(void *ptr, size_t size)
{
nice code
}
And then I use these instead of malloc and realloc
Josef Grosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know of an EBCDIC to ASCII converter? I thought that at one
time FreeBSD had one of these.
Josef
Check out the `dd' command.. particularly the `conv' suboption:
conv= value[, value ...]
Where value is one of the
In the last episode (Oct 03), Larry Lile said:
...we get scores of warnings about using characters as subscripts
to an array (-Wchar-subscripts), which generates so much noise as
to mask real warnings burried within. Therefore, I would like to
suppress this warning
Robert Nordier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
So why is using a "char" as an array subscript wrong? I had always
avoided it because the compiler complained and that was good enough
for me.
Because your char value could be negative
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Pentchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 1. September 2000 14:00
man 1 logger
pipe your stdout/stderr to logger(1), and you're all set.
You may even
specify a facility/level to log with.
Thanks for your quick
On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Intel has furnished us with IA-64 hardware and a porting effort is
already underway. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you would like to
help out in some way with the process.
What can those of us just out here do?
I believe HP provides
I believe HP provides a IA64 emultor which runs on Linux/Windows? I recall
stumbling into when looking at the IA64 compiler that SGI recently
releases.
It was mentioned on SGI's pages, but I couldn't find it anywhere on HP's
site (the link didn't work). If you have a pointer
My professor plans to use FreeBSD for teaching purpose. We will allow
students to build their kernel but do not want to give them root password.
So it's better to find a way to let students build kernel under their own
account, save the kernel on a floppy and then boot from the floppy.
I
This came across the Linux/390 mailing list today, I thought it
might be interesting for people:
"IBM makes JFS technology available for Linux - Technology based on OS/2
Warp Journaled File System goes open source". See
Hello!
Try the following:
Take any year, minute, seconds, hours (etc...).
set the struct tm accordingly.
set the tm-tm_mon = 10 (November)
set the tm-tm_mday = 31 (november has only 31 days)
mktime(3) with this tm returns the date 1 Dezember.
Does POSIX want this?
Does anyone
P.S. Actually, although Martin Cracauer's suggested replacement for
the existing Mozilla code is certainly better than what Mozilla is
using now, it may perhaps need to be slightly augmented with an
additional check to see if the value of `d' is a NaN prior to per-
forming the range
David -
The man page for the ELF linker says:
ld accepts Linker Command Language files to provide ex-
plicit and total control over the linking process. This
man page does not describe the command language; see the
`ld' entry in `info', or the manual ld: the
The kernel hangs (rather an endless loop) with messages like:
ncr0: timeout nccb=0xc0c38000
if I attach a fujitsu M2513A2 640MB MO drive. From a quick glance in the
ncr source it seems there's a problem with the script stuff in case of a
timeout. Anyway, this doesn't happen
Include sys/types.h before sys/sockets.h
- Dave R. -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In message 19991129230436.A6501@badmofo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: [badmofo@/home/matt] df -h
: FilesystemSize UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
: /dev/wd0s1a 722M20M 644M 3% /
: /dev/wd0s2h 9.9G 4.4G 4.8G48% /usr
: procfs4.0K 4.0K 0B 100%
Stephen McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] write
On Tuesday, 30th November 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
FilesystemSize UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/da0s1a 62.0M 31.0M 26.1M54% /
/dev/da0s1e 192M 167M 9.22M95% /usr
/dev/da0s1d 61.4M 11.3M 45.2M20%
Stephen McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And to Thomas: I've used dfspace before on ISC Unix, but never really
liked it. I prefer df to do what I want. Am I greedy? :-)
Not at all - it just seems to me the question should be asked,
that's all.
Since not a single person agreed - it seems
You're missing a #include of sys/types.h
- Dave R. -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I'm trying to track down a problem in 3.3-RELEASE
(which I _think_ might be a linux emu bug that's
crashing the kernel.)
Anyway - I thought I might ask here for some
kernel debugging assistance...
I've got a debuggable kernel, with DDB.
When the panic occurs (which I can readily reproduce)
I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chuck Robey
writes:
: Uhhh? I've long since got the answer I wanted, but this seems a complete
: mystery, so I'll bite, what's a OI_add_event? From some package? Can't
: find a man page on it.
OI was a native C++ toolkit that had a nice interface and was
Does anyone (anyone, that is, who's coded X11 applications) know how you
handle X11 callbacks to C++ object methods?
Thanks,
If you mean Xt (and possibly Motif) - the answer is "very carefully."
The Xt callbacks are C based, so you typically can't directly call a
C++ method.
But,
Then you just stick a C wrapper function around every C++ callback you
want to register, is that it? Seems a bit inelegant, but I suppose, if
the ultimate test of elegance is that "it's the only one that works", then
it's perhaps elegant *enough*.
I believe someone posted a better
And - to add to this - I still can freeze up my pentium
laptop rather quickly (3.2-RELEASE, 40meg memory, P90) running
setiathome.
And - I've got DDB in the kernel, and ensured it's not overheating
(it will freeze up in less than a minute from a _very_ cold start.)
I don't get a panic, ddb
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
:Will you be assigning the copyright to the FSF? (ie: you'll never be able
:to change your mind? 50 years is a long time...)
70 now I believe. Changed to be compatible with the euros, who are all 70
years apparently.
If I understand things
In a discussion with Nate Williams, I have learned that the reason FreeBSD
doesn't use minor numbers with shared libraries because standard ELF doesn't
support it. Is this a hard-and-fast unbreakable rule, or is this something
that could be implemented if it can be done in a way that's
In a discussion with Nate Williams, I have learned that the reason FreeBSD
doesn't use minor numbers with shared libraries because standard ELF doesn't
support it. Is this a hard-and-fast unbreakable rule, or is this something
that could be implemented if it can be done in a way that's
Kenny Drobnack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lately i have seen a lot of speculation as to what will happen when the
Intel Merced comes out. Will people wait 12-18 months for a 64 bit
Windows (that's the amount of time I keep hearing it will take them to get
Win2000 running on it) or will they
Kenny Drobnack kdrob...@mission.mvnc.edu writes:
Lately i have seen a lot of speculation as to what will happen when the
Intel Merced comes out. Will people wait 12-18 months for a 64 bit
Windows (that's the amount of time I keep hearing it will take them to get
Win2000 running on it) or
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Jay West wrote:
Keep in mind that the merced chip was not really designed or created by
Intel at all.
=20
It was created almost completely by HP (by the same group responsible for
PA-RISC), with Intel as merely the production facilities. For obvious
marketing,
All the files under Tandem's NSK has mandatory locking. The file cannot be
opened if another process has it opened. some thing like
* if the file is opened for reading, any one can open it for
reading but opening for writing gives error
* if the file is open for writing, it can't
All the files under Tandem's NSK has mandatory locking. The file cannot be
opened if another process has it opened. some thing like
* if the file is opened for reading, any one can open it for
reading but opening for writing gives error
* if the file is open for writing, it can't be
I had a thought on this
It seems you are trying to provide the floppy model that users
currently have with their PCs.
User A writes the floppy, User B can read it and do whatever he
wants...
(I know this is Apple - but I'll stick to MSDOS for the discussion,
and floppy indicates any
Bill Fumerola writes:
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes.
Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own committers. Cool.
Bill Fumerola writes:
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes.
Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own committers. Cool.
If someone is interested to solve a problem:
$ dd if=/dev/zero bs=8848 count=1 of=a 2/dev/null
$ cp a b
$ cmp a b 0 0x300
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ cmp a b 0 0x200
cmp: EOF on b
$ cmp a b 0x300 0
cmp: EOF on a
Jean-Marc
I've seen a
If someone is interested to solve a problem:
$ dd if=/dev/zero bs=8848 count=1 of=a 2/dev/null
$ cp a b
$ cmp a b 0 0x300
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ cmp a b 0 0x200
cmp: EOF on b
$ cmp a b 0x300 0
cmp: EOF on a
Jean-Marc
I've seen a
If someone is interested to solve a problem:
$ dd if=/dev/zero bs=8848 count=1 of=a 2/dev/null
$ cp a b
$ cmp a b 0 0x300
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ cmp a b 0 0x200
cmp: EOF on b
$ cmp a b 0x300 0
cmp: EOF on a
Jean-Marc
I've seen a similar problem when doing cmp with
If someone is interested to solve a problem:
$ dd if=/dev/zero bs=8848 count=1 of=a 2/dev/null
$ cp a b
$ cmp a b 0 0x300
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ cmp a b 0 0x200
cmp: EOF on b
$ cmp a b 0x300 0
cmp: EOF on a
Jean-Marc
I've seen a similar problem when doing cmp with
Also, I haven't gone into the code yet, but the floating point
registers are not saved into the sigcontext so that they can be
inspected and modified as appropriate.
Thanks,
John
If I recall correctly - I think there's a discussion of why this
is the case in the -hackers mail
I just wondered if this should be integrated into ptrace(), so
the various debuggers wouldn't have to know about it.
It seems that would be the proper abstraction - hardware that supports
it would "have it" - and the programs that "used it" wouldn't have to
know anything special.
I only have
I just wondered if this should be integrated into ptrace(), so
the various debuggers wouldn't have to know about it.
It seems that would be the proper abstraction - hardware that supports
it would have it - and the programs that used it wouldn't have to
know anything special.
I only have a
Hi,
After recently debugging a very elusive memory overwrite problem that
I was only able to find by setting up a debugger watch point, and
suffering through the slowness that this introduced, I began reading
up on the ix86 support for hardware watch points. Using this facility
of the
That being said... I've heard some of my ex-coworkers (who were all
FreeBSD people when they worked here) come up to me in this impressed
tone: "You wouldn't believe how much easier it is to install RedHat!'.
*sigh* I'm not bitching... just being loyal :)
That's ridiculous. I've used
That being said... I've heard some of my ex-coworkers (who were all
FreeBSD people when they worked here) come up to me in this impressed
tone: You wouldn't believe how much easier it is to install RedHat!'.
*sigh* I'm not bitching... just being loyal :)
That's ridiculous. I've used
Would everyone agree that it's not a "good thing" for a user-mode
program to be able to lock up the OS?
There are severall resons.
One of them is that I got panics with a to high set MAXUSER in kernel options.
I don't know if it's a problem with 3.2.
The other possible reason might be
Would everyone agree that it's not a good thing for a user-mode
program to be able to lock up the OS?
There are severall resons.
One of them is that I got panics with a to high set MAXUSER in kernel options.
I don't know if it's a problem with 3.2.
The other possible reason might be a
I seem to recall seeing this someone (this may not be the
right list.)
But - I downloaded the 3.2 s...@home and starting running it
on a left-over 75mhz laptop I have.
It seems to crash the laptop (silently lock it up, actually)
fairly quickly.
Did I recall someone else mentioning that?
There is a story behind it: our product was shipping for hpux
and was later ported to sinix. It had some instabilities during
development (it was first developed for hpux, then the enhancements were
ported to sinix, almost in parallel).
A colleague wrote (paraphrased)
I don't seem to be able to get 3.2 to do a SL/IP
install (this is for a laptop which seems to be
having PAO problems...)
Turning on DEBUG in the install options, I can watch
it nicely execute:
ifconfig sl0 inet 10.0.0.98 10.0.0.99 netmask 255.255.255.0
but - not matter what - that always
I don't seem to be able to get 3.2 to do a SL/IP
install (this is for a laptop which seems to be
having PAO problems...)
Turning on DEBUG in the install options, I can watch
it nicely execute:
ifconfig sl0 inet 10.0.0.98 10.0.0.99 netmask 255.255.255.0
but - not matter what -
To add more to this - tracing through in.c in the kernel,
I see that when you configure an interface it eventually
works its way down to rtrequest - to add a route for
the new interface.
I believe rtrequest() is the one returning EEXIST which is
what causes ifconfig on sl0 to always complain
Well -
I've added some printf()s to determine that what I suspected
was correct. The route is being entered into the table
twice.
If looks like in_ifinit() is calling the sioctl() routine,
which calls if_up(), which then adds the route.
Then, in_ifinit() goes on to add another route and
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
To add more to this - tracing through in.c in the kernel,
I see that when you configure an interface it eventually
works its way down to rtrequest - to add a route for
the new interface.
I believe rtrequest() is the one returning EEXIST which is
what
symlinks have caused me grief (Pyramid OSx) and never joy. I hope it fails
yet again to appear in FreeBSD. Just think of the new security holes for a
start.
Name one, please. You can currently point a symlink anyplace you
like; whether the user has permission to *read* or execute the
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 12:40:46AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
Can someone comment please? Is this a bug in the way the gcc2.8 is
installed, or is it a bug in my understanding? (probably the latter).
Perhaps you need a gcc-compiled version of libstdc++. It's just a
guess,
Strange.
I'm having a wierd time trying to get a package called Swish++ working.
It's a C++/STL based program, which the author recommends compiling up
with Gcc2.8 or higher.
So... I've installed gcc-2.8.1 glibstdc++-2.8.1.1, and compiled it
up. Strangely however, the 'search' part
On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 10:45:39AM -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x8052c0f in ostream::flush () at /usr/include/ctype.h:149
#1 0x8052912 in ostream::operator () at /usr/include/ctype.h:149
#2 0x804995f in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfbfdb54) at search.c:219
(gdb) l
The machine is a SMP 3.0-RELEASE box.
A heavily threaded program is segfaulting in the longjmp() function.
Any ideas what would cause this?
Regards,
Dan
You could have trashed your jmp_buf... (i.e. you're passing bad data
to longjmp().)
Just a thought...
- Dave
Hi,
We're seeing the following message on one of the drives we have
mounted in a server system.
(da23:ahc1:0:14:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 46 aa 50 0 0 40 0
(da23:ahc1:0:14:0): RECOVERED ERROR info:46aa77 asc:18,7
(da23:ahc1:0:14:0): Recovered data with ECC - data
Hi,
I need the bt848/bt878 driver to find out the motherboard's PCI chipset.
IE, Is this Bt878 card sitting on a VIA, SIS, OPTi or INTEL motherboard.
Can this be done?
The Bt878 can be programmed to run in
Intel (Full PCI2.1 ompatible) Mode
Intel 440FX mode
SIS/VIA/OPTi mode.
Dave
Just a thought - not really an answer to your question... but...
I struck me that since bt848 isn't in the default kernel (you have
to build your own kernel for it) - couldn't you just make this
a flag in the config file?
Then, a couple of #ifdef's in the
Actually - this comes down to the argument of what the market will
bear, contract law, and the legal ramifications of bugs/problems.
You bought the software, and agreed to the license terms
when you opened the box, didn't you - Caveat Emptor.
As long as you keep buying it, people/companies will
97 matches
Mail list logo
