Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 07/07/2012 16:33, Garrett Wollman wrote:
The utilities (specifically host(1) and dig(1)) are the only
user-visible interfaces I care about.
[...]
ldns (a dependency of unbound) comes with drill, which is a dig-alike
tool. I'd like to see us produce a
Mark Linimon wrote:
fwiw, from previous discussions on FreeBSD boot time, ISTR that there
are other places where more time is spent. Some analysis to prove that
indeed the rc subsystem is the dominant term would be a good starting
place.
While I don't want to proliferate this thread or
Andy Young ayo...@mosaicarchive.com wrote:
After using Linux for almost 15 years, I only recently started using
FreeBSD. I own an internet startup and was looking for a solution for
implementing large-scale storage servers. In my research I found ZFS and
subsequently found FreeBSD. As I
Da Rock wrote:
I googled a bit and found an old post here from Luigi
(http://osdir.com/ml/freebsd-hackers/2008-11/msg00245.html) which had a
script to do this, but I'm having trouble with it- is anyone familiar
with this? I'm on a bit of a deadline...
Can't help you with that script (I
Fabien Thomas wrote:
So, what's going on here? Is this the intended behavior, or can it
be changed? And how do I get accurate readings?
If i remember well:
The current code will get real HW PMC if the PMC is running and attached to
owner.
The first case is not true in your code so you get
Hi, folks. I'm trying to use pmc(3) to analyze code fragments, and
I've run into strange behavior: the counter values returned by
pmc_read(3) sometimes show no increment between readings, but are
updated a second later; even if the PMC in question was stopped
before.
Here's a test program:
the idea to start services concurrently during boot isn't new and the
question why FreeBSD doesn't do it has popped up on the forum and
mailing list occasionally. So, why not give it a shot?
As someone who uses FreeBSD on hist laptop and is constantly annoyed
by the lack of suspend-to-disk,
I haven't done any measurements yet on how large the speedup is, but booting
feels a bit faster with it.
FWIW, my laptop's boot time (from pressing power to seeing login
prompt) is reduced from 44s to 37s (out of which, first 20-25s are
kernel booting).
Zafer Aydoğan wrote:
Hmm... there seems to be very little interest so far.
FWIW, I find this tool useful, but since it's most helpful when you
need to dig into a previously unknown portion of code, which doesn't
happen that often, it's reasonable to expect infrequent usage -- don't
mistake that
Steven Hartland wrote:
A few key question come to mind:-
1. Has sendmail's config moved away from the black art
it once was?
No.
2. Is postfix that much easier?
Yes.
3. What would people use for:
3.1. POP / IMAP support?
Dovecot. As a bonus, Postfix can use Dovecot's SASL for
10 matches
Mail list logo
