On Sunday, October 06, 2013 3:30:42 am Alexander Motin wrote:
On 02.10.2013 20:30, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, September 07, 2013 2:32:45 am Alexander Motin wrote:
On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
On
On 07.10.2013 19:09, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, October 06, 2013 3:30:42 am Alexander Motin wrote:
On 02.10.2013 20:30, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, September 07, 2013 2:32:45 am Alexander Motin wrote:
On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM
On 02.10.2013 20:30, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, September 07, 2013 2:32:45 am Alexander Motin wrote:
On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 06.09.2013 11:06, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM
On Saturday, September 07, 2013 2:32:45 am Alexander Motin wrote:
On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 06.09.2013 11:06, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:48:38PM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
against present head (r255131) can be
On 07.09.2013 02:02, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 06.09.2013 11:06, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I've found and fixed possible double request completion, that could cause
such symptoms if happened. Updated patch located as usual:
On 06.09.2013 11:06, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I've found and fixed possible double request completion, that could cause
such symptoms if happened.
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:29:11AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 06.09.2013 11:06, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:46:27AM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I've found and fixed possible double
On 04.09.2013 19:31, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
- HP EliteBook 8460p (amd64: r255188) with DVD replaced by a second
hardrive (where fbsd is installed): It crash just after the message
GEOM: new disk ada1 during boot
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I've found and fixed possible double request completion, that could cause
such symptoms if happened. Updated patch located as usual:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/camlock_patches/camlock_20130905.patch
Good catch!
this
On 04.09.2013 00:48, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
help further it.
Just
On 09/04/13 02:01, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 04.09.2013 00:48, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo
outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
- HP EliteBook 8460p (amd64: r255188) with DVD replaced by a second
hardrive (where fbsd is installed): It crash just after the message
GEOM: new disk ada1 during boot
screenshot of the crash screen:
On 04.09.2013 15:45, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 09/04/13 02:01, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 04.09.2013 00:48, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo
outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:11:28 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do
the
porting work?
-Nathan
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do the
porting work?
-Nathan
#define GET_STACK_USAGE(total, used)
GET_STACK_USAGE sets the variable passed in
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do the
porting work?
-Nathan
#define GET_STACK_USAGE(total, used)
GET_STACK_USAGE sets the variable passed in total to the total amount
of stack
On 09/04/13 11:00, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:11:28 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
against
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
see
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:10:32PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
help further it.
Just checking to see how widely its been tested,
I've
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé oliv...@cochard.mewrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:24:26PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:10:32PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I would
Hi.
I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
against present head (r255131) can be found here:
27 matches
Mail list logo
