In some way, using Linux LinuxThreads programs that use shared memory, I've
ended up with dozens of shared memory segments that reportedly still have 1
attachment (which I'm really darn certain is impossible since I've killed
_everything_ in sight). I think something must have happened that
* Brian F. Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010424 05:07] wrote:
In some way, using Linux LinuxThreads programs that use shared memory, I've
ended up with dozens of shared memory segments that reportedly still have 1
attachment (which I'm really darn certain is impossible since I've killed
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Brian F. Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010424 05:07] wrote:
In some way, using Linux LinuxThreads programs that use shared memory, I've
ended up with dozens of shared memory segments that reportedly still have 1
attachment (which I'm really darn
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:01:08PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
Has anyone else at least experienced this?
I'm pretty sure I have, on 4.2-R or shortly later, but the fellow who was
reporting it to me never bothered to pare his code down to a good test
case, and I'm not at that job any more.
4 matches
Mail list logo