Hi,
Thanks for all response, especially for Mr. Robert N M Watson
I read all , and i got a lot thing from conversation about this.
It's nice community, thanks once again.
Regards
Binto
Roman Divacky wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
On Sun,
2007/11/25, Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just want to add my 2 cents, that my recent experience with FreeBSD MP
has been extremely positive. I tend to use highly CPU bound MP programs,
typically lots and lots of floating point operations. It used to be that
Linux beat
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
(Also when I run 4 threads with 2 cpus, each with hyperthreading, it goes
2.5 to 3 times faster - surprising since hyperthreading gets quite bad press
for its performance improvements - I should add that Linux didn't do at all
well at
Hello,
Quoting Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No problem -- just to be clear: in 7, users can still choose between
libpthread (m:n) and libthr (1:1), but the default is now libthr rather than
libpthread, as libthr seemed to perform better in most if not all workloads
of
interest.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Quoting Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No problem -- just to be clear: in 7, users can still choose between
libpthread (m:n) and libthr (1:1), but the default is now libthr rather than
libpthread, as libthr seemed to perform better in most if not all
, and the filesystem.'
What the different virtual memory system, the networking stack, and the
filesystem. before under giant lock after moved out from under giant
lock?
I'm interest get deeper learn operating system, especially with FreeBSD..
Binto,
Most currently available operating
On Nov 25, 2007 12:05 PM, Christopher Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 3:13 AM, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this point, Giant is gradually becoming a lock around the tty, newbus,
usb,
and msdosfs code, and we're largely at diminishing returns in terms of
On Nov 25, 2007 3:13 AM, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this point, Giant is gradually becoming a lock around the tty, newbus, usb,
and msdosfs code, and we're largely at diminishing returns in terms of making
improvements in parallelism through removing Giant. In FreeBSD 7, the
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Christopher Chen wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 12:05 PM, Christopher Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 3:13 AM, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this point, Giant is gradually becoming a lock around the tty, newbus,
usb, and msdosfs code, and we're largely
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
granularity and improving opportunities for kernel parallelism by better
distributing workloads over CPU pools. This is important because the number
of
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
granularity and improving opportunities for kernel parallelism by better
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Roman Divacky wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
granularity and improving
I just want to add my 2 cents, that my recent experience with FreeBSD MP
has been extremely positive. I tend to use highly CPU bound MP programs,
typically lots and lots of floating point operations. It used to be that
Linux beat FreeBSD hands down - now FreeBSD seems to have a slight
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Kip Macy wrote:
I just want to add my 2 cents, that my recent experience with FreeBSD MP
has been extremely positive. I tend to use highly CPU bound MP programs,
typically lots and lots of floating point operations. It used to be that
Linux beat FreeBSD hands down -
Roman Divacky wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
granularity and improving opportunities for kernel
the different virtual memory system, the networking stack, and the
filesystem. before under giant lock after moved out from under giant
lock?
I'm interest get deeper learn operating system, especially with FreeBSD..
Regards,
Binto
___
freebsd-hackers
16 matches
Mail list logo
