Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion

2008-01-17 Thread Ulf Lilleengen
On ons, jan 16, 2008 at 04:15:53pm +0100, Philip Paeps wrote: On 2008-01-16 16:06:56 (+0100), Ulf Lilleengen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, this might only fix the issue with yacc if I'm thinking correctly, because the lexer also needs to be told about this for reentrancy. (But perhaps a

Csup cvsmode build discussion

2008-01-16 Thread Ulf Lilleengen
Hello hackers, As some might know, I've been implementing CVSMode for csup over the last couple of months. Right now, I'm quite close to have it work (does not mean it will work perfect :)), but I encountered some issues regarding the inclusion of my lex and yacc files that I would like to

Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion

2008-01-16 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, On 16 Jan 2008, at 09:33, Ulf Lilleengen wrote: Hello hackers, As some might know, I've been implementing CVSMode for csup over the last couple of months. Right now, I'm quite close to have it work (does not mean it will work perfect :)), but I encountered some issues regarding the

Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion

2008-01-16 Thread Ulf Lilleengen
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:08:20AM +, Bob Bishop wrote: Hi, On 16 Jan 2008, at 09:33, Ulf Lilleengen wrote: Hello hackers, As some might know, I've been implementing CVSMode for csup over the last couple of months. Right now, I'm quite close to have it work (does not mean it

Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion

2008-01-16 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2008-01-16 10:33:02 (+0100), Ulf Lilleengen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, the base system already have flex, but the flex version in base is heavily outdated (version 2.5.4 versus 2.5.34 in ports) and does not support reentrancy. Is there a reason why it's outdated? What I can think of

Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion

2008-01-16 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:32:14PM +0100 I heard the voice of Ulf Lilleengen, and lo! it spake thus: On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:08:20AM +, Bob Bishop wrote: Why do you want prefixing? Prefixing is needed since csup already have a configuration parser written in lex/yacc and therefore

Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion

2008-01-16 Thread Ulf Lilleengen
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:41:47AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:32:14PM +0100 I heard the voice of Ulf Lilleengen, and lo! it spake thus: On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:08:20AM +, Bob Bishop wrote: Why do you want prefixing? Prefixing is needed since

Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion

2008-01-16 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, On 16 Jan 2008, at 13:32, Ulf Lilleengen wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:08:20AM +, Bob Bishop wrote: [...] Why do you want prefixing? And precisely what do you want to do with parameters? Prefixing is needed since csup already have a configuration parser written in lex/yacc and

Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion

2008-01-16 Thread Ulf Lilleengen
On ons, jan 16, 2008 at 02:39:26pm +, Bob Bishop wrote: Hi, On 16 Jan 2008, at 13:32, Ulf Lilleengen wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:08:20AM +, Bob Bishop wrote: [...] Why do you want prefixing? And precisely what do you want to do with parameters? Prefixing is needed since

Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion

2008-01-16 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2008-01-16 16:06:56 (+0100), Ulf Lilleengen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, this might only fix the issue with yacc if I'm thinking correctly, because the lexer also needs to be told about this for reentrancy. (But perhaps a much smaller problem since it's a matter of updating the lex