Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-21 Thread Peter Blok
Hi, I'm one of the users in need of a clean update path. I will dedicate a system for update and geom_vinum tests. Peter On Tuesday 20 January 2004 21:25, Lukas Ertl wrote: On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Kevin Wooten wrote: My 2 cents is to start building the house from the ground with the geom

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-21 Thread Andreas Braukmann
On 01/21/04 09:26:58 +0100 Peter Blok wrote: I'm one of the users in need of a clean update path. I will dedicate a system for update and geom_vinum tests. I step in. I complained bitterly about the rip-it-off-plans. I'm currently not able to help out coding, but I would gladly supply remote

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-21 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Andreas Braukmann wrote: On 01/21/04 09:26:58 +0100 Peter Blok wrote: I'm one of the users in need of a clean update path. I will dedicate a system for update and geom_vinum tests. I step in. I complained bitterly about the rip-it-off-plans. I'm currently not able to

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-21 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:47:02PM +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote: + I think we should really get together on a separate mailing list - is it + time for freebsd-geom@ yet? My proposal is [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX Systems

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-21 Thread Josef El-Rayes
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And to answer another message: yes, Vinum on FreeBSD *must* be adapted to GEOM. There's no other solution. shouldn't we add this as a task item to the releng schedule? -josef -- Josef El-Rayes (__) Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-21 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Lukas Ertl wrote: I step in. I complained bitterly about the rip-it-off-plans. s/plans/proposal/ I'm currently not able to help out coding, but I would gladly supply remote console access to a box suitable for vinum testing. (Including access to a local

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-21 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Wednesday, 21 January 2004 at 12:35:52 +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote: Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And to answer another message: yes, Vinum on FreeBSD *must* be adapted to GEOM. There's no other solution. shouldn't we add this as a task item to the releng schedule? That

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: following the recent discussion about GEOM and Vinum I wrote some proof-of-concept code, or rather, I copy'n'pasted the necessary stuff for a prototype. Of course it's ugly, it's buggy, it's by far not complete, but at least it understands the most basic

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-20 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: following the recent discussion about GEOM and Vinum I wrote some proof-of-concept code, or rather, I copy'n'pasted the necessary stuff for a prototype. Of course it's ugly, it's buggy, it's by far not

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-20 Thread Jeremy Faulkner
Lukas Ertl wrote: On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: following the recent discussion about GEOM and Vinum I wrote some proof-of-concept code, or rather, I copy'n'pasted the necessary stuff for a prototype. Of course it's ugly, it's buggy, it's

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was actually hoping to get a little more feedback, since I'm not so sure if I'm going into the right direction, and I'd like to hear what people say about it before I dive into hacking it more, and there was virtually no feedback at all. I've only had

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-20 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Kevin Wooten wrote: I am partially done with a replacement (not vinum compatible), that will hopefully do the same thing in the end, and more. I am trying to make a vinum that is more GEOM-ish. What I am experimenting with is using mirror, and ccd to handle the mirroring

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-20 Thread Soeren Straarup
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Lukas Ertl wrote: On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Kevin Wooten wrote: I am partially done with a replacement (not vinum compatible), that will hopefully do the same thing in the end, and more. I am trying to make a vinum that is more GEOM-ish. What I am experimenting with is

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Kevin Wooten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lukas Ertl wrote: I think we should really get together on a separate mailing list - is it time for freebsd-geom@ yet? Definitely! or some gyration thereof... freebsd-fs should be close enough for government work. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-20 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Kevin Wooten wrote: My 2 cents is to start building the house from the ground with the geom classes, then add on the algorithms from the existing vinum. and end up with the roof as is the the vinum configuration tool. My point is that with the GEOM config...who needs

Re: GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-20 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Tuesday, 20 January 2004 at 14:51:08 +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote: On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: following the recent discussion about GEOM and Vinum I wrote some proof-of-concept code, or rather, I copy'n'pasted the necessary stuff for a

GEOM + Vinum

2004-01-17 Thread Lukas Ertl
Hi -hackers, following the recent discussion about GEOM and Vinum I wrote some proof-of-concept code, or rather, I copy'n'pasted the necessary stuff for a prototype. Of course it's ugly, it's buggy, it's by far not complete, but at least it understands the most basic setup: a volume with a