I wish you the best of luck.
Thank you very much, Fernando!
I'm also happy to see you will use packagekit as a frontend. No need to
reinvent the wheel.
It is a great utility. I have learned a lot while studying it.
As a side note, I have made much progress porting PackageKit-0.8.8. It
Hi,
Can somebody review my proposal here and see if it can be further improved?
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/rushilpaul/12001
--
Regards,
Rushil
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
:
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/justin_muniz/1
I appreciate you taking the time to read this email. Happy coding everyone.
Justin Muniz
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
point c. is what i would like the most and is really the most important
for NON embedded system.
others for embedded ones.
d. won't really cut much
f. may not save much but slow things down
i wish you a success.
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Amit Rawat wrote:
Hi,
I am attaching my gsoc proposal
Hi all,
I'm planning to port GlusterFS as a GSoC project this year.
And you can find the more information of the proposal here:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/mikemandarine/26018
Any suggestions or comments are more than welcome.
I'm looking forward to connect
. Any advice could help me (or others)
develop future proposals, so I hope to hear from people even after the
deadline.
My proposal can be read at the following address:
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/justin_muniz/1
I appreciate you taking the time to read
can be read at the following address:
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/justin_muniz/1
I appreciate you taking the time to read this email. Happy coding everyone.
Justin Muniz
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.orgmailto:freebsd
at the following address:
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/justin_muniz/1
I appreciate you taking the time to read this email. Happy coding
everyone.
Justin Muniz
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
to hear from people even after the
deadline.
My proposal can be read at the following address:
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/justin_muniz/1
I appreciate you taking the time to read this email. Happy coding
everyone.
Great proposal, Justin! I look forward
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Matt Olander m...@ixsystems.com wrote:
Great proposal, Justin! I look forward to seeing your work ;)
Cheers,
-matt
Thank you very much for your support, Matt!
As soon as I start committing code, I will share a link to my repository on
this mailing-list.
El 03/05/2013 20:00, Justin Edward Muniz justin.mu...@maine.edu
escribió:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Matt Olander m...@ixsystems.com wrote:
Great proposal, Justin! I look forward to seeing your work ;)
Cheers,
-matt
Thank you very much for your support, Matt!
As soon as I
Hi,
Here is some data I collected
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/3ff3x34iq4cm2lu/RDFmXuO2xj.
Thanks,
Amit Rawat
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Amit Rawat aami...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am attaching my gsoc proposal with this mail for review. If any body
want any extra thing in it they can
Hi,
My friend has interest to apply GSoC'13 with Port NiLFS to FreeBSD, witch
is on IdeasPage(not tagged as GSoC though).
https://wiki.freebsd.org/IdeasPage#Port_NiLFS_to_FreeBSD
There's no technical contact on the page, who can be a mentor of the
project?
Or, it's not goot project for GSoC
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Mike Ma wrote:
Hi there,
I'm now a student and trying to get involved in GSoC this year.
I found the proposal of about GlusterFS in the idea list wiki page very
interesting to me, possibly it will be porting from NetBSD implementation.
As I'm quite distant from idea owner
Hi there,
I'm now a student and trying to get involved in GSoC this year.
I found the proposal of about GlusterFS in the idea list wiki page very
interesting to me, possibly it will be porting from NetBSD implementation.
As I'm quite distant from idea owner so there's a big time difference, he
Hi there,
I'm now a student and trying to get involved in GSoC this year.
I found the proposal of about GlusterFS in the idea list wiki page very
interesting to me, possibly it will be porting from NetBSD implementation.
As I'm quite distant from idea owner, he also suggested me to try to find
According to Freddie Cash on Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:32:11AM -0700:
Mostly off-topic for this thread, but improving the boot process to
auto-detect hardware and auto-load kernel modules would be really nice.
That way, GENERIC would be very small, with just the basic frameworks
required (CAM,
GSoC project.
Adrian
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
, right now. What we're missing is a
way to load them at boot time by the bootloader. Well, enough of them
to bring up the system so the rest can be autoloaded as needed.
_That_ whole mess would be a great GSoC project.
+1
pgpuBzlZI_kIu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 25 April 2013 01:38, Lars Engels l...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 01:25:46AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
.. or we could just bite the bullet and split GENERIC into GENERIC
(which would have modules for everything) and GENERIC_NOMODULES.
Then just populate a default module
to load them at boot time by the bootloader. Well, enough of them
to bring up the system so the rest can be autoloaded as needed.
_That_ whole mess would be a great GSoC project.
I completely agree.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.net
In memoriam to Ondine
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 01:57:50AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 25 April 2013 01:38, Lars Engels l...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 01:25:46AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
.. or we could just bite the bullet and split GENERIC into GENERIC
(which would have modules for
On 25 April 2013 02:24, Lars Engels l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Sure, but the rc.conf solution is the lower hanging fruit. :)
No it's not; think about it. You need to have a few modules loaded in
order to boot.
* usb
* maybe atkbd
* da/scsi
* ata / scsi block device drivers
* perhaps network
*
On 24 Apr 2013 05:36, Justin Edward Muniz justin.mu...@maine.edu wrote:
Justin I say stick to FreeBSD-update . My reason is, as Pkgng becomes
more popular , a front end for ports will be less useful as binary
packages
become more popular . Kports is a monster program , you should set a
El 24/04/2013 13:45, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com escribió:
On 24 Apr 2013 05:36, Justin Edward Muniz justin.mu...@maine.edu
wrote:
Justin I say stick to FreeBSD-update . My reason is, as Pkgng becomes
more popular , a front end for ports will be less useful as binary
packages
Am 24.04.2013 13:44, schrieb Chris Rees:
On 24 Apr 2013 05:36, Justin Edward Muniz justin.mu...@maine.edu
wrote:
Justin I say stick to FreeBSD-update . My reason is, as Pkgng
becomes
more popular , a front end for ports will be less useful as binary
packages
become more popular . Kports
During some tests with cut down kernels one can easily make unbuildable
kernel, for example include option A, while omit hiddenly required B.
If there could be framework at least with deps tracking/checking, what
could be good for begin.
Both for configuring, and code clean up.
If this will come
On Apr 24, 2013, at 5:43 AM, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
It _is_ easy. But having a nice graphical tool which draws a pretty table of
GENERIC and NOTES together with useful information about the possible options
and devices would be a handy thing to have IMHO.
Let's make FreeBSD
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
Am 24.04.2013 13:44, schrieb Chris Rees:
Our kernel is actually very easy to configure, so I'm not convinced that
it's needed; you may be thinking of Linux's menuconfig, but I think that
is
because of the complexity.
Our kernel is actually very easy to configure, so I'm not convinced that
it's needed; you may be thinking of Linux's menuconfig, but I think that is
because of the complexity.
Chris
While configuring the kernel may be trivial to someone who understands the
process and their systems needs,
, but
general use and hardware changes wouldn't.
Most likely not a GSoC project. But it's still a nice dream. :)
--
Freddie Cash
fjwc...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe
On 24 April 2013 18:30, Justin Edward Muniz justin.mu...@maine.edu wrote:
Our kernel is actually very easy to configure, so I'm not convinced that
it's needed; you may be thinking of Linux's menuconfig, but I think that is
because of the complexity.
Chris
While configuring the kernel may
I agree. Also, the kind of people who compile their kernels probably
feel more comfortable in console mode :)
The frontend for pkgng and freebsd-update might have a bigger user base.
Hello Fernando, thank you for pointing me towards kports earlier. I
appreciate your help.
It is starting
from modules. That would remove almost all requirements to compile
a custom kernel in the first place. :)
Granted, changing options in the kernel would require recompilation, but
general use and hardware changes wouldn't.
Most likely not a GSoC project. But it's still a nice dream
I think the interface to pkgng and freebsd-update are still
interesting; at least more worthwhile than the kernel configuration
one.
I think the pkgng one has the edge, since packages are updated far
more often than base, and it's easier to track base.
Now you are at a stage where you
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Justin Edward Muniz
justin.mu...@maine.edu wrote:
I think the interface to pkgng and freebsd-update are still
interesting; at least more worthwhile than the kernel configuration
one.
I think the pkgng one has the edge, since packages are updated far
It _is_ easy. But having a nice graphical tool which draws a pretty table
of
GENERIC and NOTES together with useful information about the possible
options
and devices would be a handy thing to have IMHO.
Let's make FreeBSD userfriendly :-)
I agree completely, hopefully we can make that
During some tests with cut down kernels one can easily make unbuildable
kernel, for example include option A, while omit hiddenly required B.
If there could be framework at least with deps tracking/checking, what
could be good for begin.
Both for configuring, and code clean up.
If this will
and deployment
clean and easy?
Regards,
Tony
What you say makes a lot of sense. I am feeling confident that the kernel
GUI should be a lower priority, and not used for the GSoC proposal.
Thank you for your time.
Justin Muniz
___
freebsd-hackers
On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Justin Edward Muniz
justin.mu...@maine.edumailto:justin.mu...@maine.edu wrote:
I think the interface to pkgng and freebsd-update are still
interesting; at least more worthwhile than the kernel configuration
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Justin Edward Muniz wrote:
I think the interface to pkgng and freebsd-update are still
interesting; at least more worthwhile than the kernel configuration
one.
I think the pkgng one has the edge, since packages are updated far
more often than
On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Justin Edward Muniz
justin.mu...@maine.edumailto:justin.mu...@maine.edu wrote:
I think the interface to pkgng and freebsd-update are still
interesting; at
On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Justin Edward Muniz wrote:
I think the interface to pkgng and freebsd-update are still
interesting; at least more worthwhile than the kernel configuration
one.
I think the pkgng one has the
You'll probably want to get in touch with the PC-BSD folks. As they are
moving to pkgng for everything, they are updating their Python-based GUIs
to work with it. Might be a possibility to work together, or to build
off what
they have, or to get ideas/inspiration for a more general tool.
I
El 24/04/2013 21:18, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com escribió:
On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Justin Edward Muniz wrote:
I think the interface to pkgng and freebsd-update are still
interesting; at least more
On Apr 24, 2013, at 2:33 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
El 24/04/2013 21:18, Teske, Devin
devin.te...@fisglobal.commailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com escribió:
On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Justin Edward Muniz wrote:
I
On Apr 21, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Justin Edward Muniz justin.mu...@maine.edu wrote:
Hello everyone once again,
I decided to split this from my previous thread because the nature of
my questions has changed. I benefited from the last thread, and I am
grateful to those who responded to it.
Justin I say stick to FreeBSD-update . My reason is, as Pkgng becomes
more popular , a front end for ports will be less useful as binary packages
become more popular . Kports is a monster program , you should set a
reasonable goal ,and target dates; which may be hard with a cleanup project
Hello everyone once again,
I decided to split this from my previous thread because the nature of
my questions has changed. I benefited from the last thread, and I am
grateful to those who responded to it.
For me Google Summer of Code is a big opportunity, and my interest in
I am excited for this year's Google Summer of Code, and I have a
project in mind that I am working to propose.
I am a CS major and have experience with Qt, C++ and shell scripting.
I have been developing on FreeBSD for several years, and I am looking to
tackle developing a new Qt
On 14 April 2013 07:11, Justin Edward Muniz justin.mu...@maine.edu wrote:
I am excited for this year's Google Summer of Code, and I have a
project in mind that I am working to propose.
I am a CS major and have experience with Qt, C++ and shell scripting.
I have been developing on
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 02:11:44AM -0400, Justin Edward Muniz wrote:
I am excited for this year's Google Summer of Code, and I have a
project in mind that I am working to propose.
I am a CS major and have experience with Qt, C++ and shell scripting.
I have been developing on FreeBSD
I am a CS major and have experience with Qt, C++ and shell scripting.
I have been developing on FreeBSD for several years, and I am looking to
tackle developing a new Qt front-end for the freebsd-update command.
spend your time for something more useful :)
Thank you for your advice! I have already sent an email to Colin, and I did
indeed take the idea from that page.
Justin Muniz
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 14 April 2013 07:11, Justin Edward Muniz justin.mu...@maine.edu
wrote:
I am excited for
On 14 April 2013 11:42, Justin Edward Muniz justin.mu...@maine.edu wrote:
Thank you for your advice! I have already sent an email to Colin, and I did
indeed take the idea from that page.
I think GUI front ends to freebsd-update, portsnap, or pkgng would all
be useful.
One thing I would look
I think GUI front ends to freebsd-update, portsnap, or pkgng would all be
useful.
One thing I would look into though, is what PC-BSD offers. They may
already have similar things.
Very interesting, I am checking out the source for PC-BSD's updater to
study it.
Portsnap and pkgng seem like
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Justin Edward Muniz
justin.mu...@maine.edu wrote:
I think GUI front ends to freebsd-update, portsnap, or pkgng would all be
useful.
One thing I would look into though, is what PC-BSD offers. They may
already have similar things.
Very interesting, I am
On 14 April 2013 12:15, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to also ask, what would a GUI offer that the command line tools
do not offer at the moment?
A GUI.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 14 April 2013 12:15, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to also ask, what would a GUI offer that the command line tools
do not offer at the moment?
A GUI.
That's kind of given :D
But does FreeBSD lack
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 14 April 2013 12:15, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to also ask, what would a GUI offer that the command line tools
do not
Please don't mix the two, they are related but their usages do not really
overlap.
portsnap(8) only deals with keeping the ports(7) tree and the
/usr/ports/INDEX file up to date.
PKGNG (like the old pkg_* tools) is mostly concerned with registering
built ports as packages or installing
It seems we already have something similar in the ports[1] collection.
There is also a newer version[2] using Qt4 but it seems more limited. It
might be worth a look at those first.
[1] ports-mgmt/kports
[2] ports-mgmt/kports-qt4
Yes, I just found those GUI programs myself. No sense
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Justin Edward Muniz
justin.mu...@maine.edu wrote:
It seems we already have something similar in the ports[1] collection.
There is also a newer version[2] using Qt4 but it seems more limited. It
might be worth a look at those first.
[1] ports-mgmt/kports
[2]
Hi ,
I am interested in participating for GSOC -2013 . I am interested in
following ideas
CPU online/offline project
BHyVe BIOS emulation to boot legacy systems I have two years of work exp in
linux kernel device driver,C
now I have selected master thesis as virtualization so I would
Am 10.04.2013 15:27, schrieb Matthew Jacob:
On 4/9/2013 11:53 PM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
this host can run x11 apps! so 'Huge' is a relative matter, my first
PDP11/45 has 64K :-) danny
Bah. Real old farts ran munix on a 32k PDP 11/03- shell and apps in
the low 16k and the kernel in the upper.
On 2013-Apr-09 11:05:56 -0700, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
You have to look at the in-memory sizes, not the on-disk sizes.
Or, even better, look at the difference between installed physical RAM
and how much RAM is available to userland processes.
--
Peter Jeremy
pgpOHqKqYTU0M.pgp
happy that FreeBSD is among the selected organization.
I am a third year student interested to work in the field of embedded
system. I applied last year and the title of my project was Kernel Size
why only in embedded system. smaller programs are always good :)
And yes FreeBSD kernel
On 4/9/2013 11:53 PM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
this host can run x11 apps! so 'Huge' is a relative matter, my first
PDP11/45 has 64K :-) danny
Bah. Real old farts ran munix on a 32k PDP 11/03- shell and apps in the
low 16k and the kernel in the upper. Or was it the other way around? At
Tektronix,
On Tuesday, 9 April 2013 at 22:18, Joshua Isom wrote:
Would clang's LTO help for size? I know work's starting on the bsd
elftools ld, but I doubt it has any LTO support yet. Running -Os on the
kernel as a whole instead of object files could probably help a lot
also. I might try to set it up
On 4/10/2013 9:43 AM, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
The last I heard, LTO on the kernel required something like 16 GB of RAM and
produced a not-quite-working image.
Jon
I upgraded my system with 32Gb for a reason.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
On 10 April 2013 13:06, Joshua Isom jri...@gmail.com wrote:
I upgraded my system with 32Gb for a reason.
Yes, yes you did.
TO force me to fix ath(4) and busdma. ;-)
Adrian
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
On 4/8/13 6:42 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Well, it's relatively easy to experience what it's like.
No it's not. We all have jobs that demand different things from us.
Taking the time to guess at the problem, only to be told you're doing
it wrong by someone actually in the position to build
happy that FreeBSD is among the selected organization.
I am a third year student interested to work in the field of embedded
system. I applied last year and the title of my project was Kernel Size
why only in embedded system. smaller programs are always good :)
And yes FreeBSD kernel is huge.
On 4/9/13 10:36 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
happy that FreeBSD is among the selected organization.
I am a third year student interested to work in the field of embedded
system. I applied last year and the title of my project was Kernel
Size
why only in embedded system. smaller programs are
And yes FreeBSD kernel is huge. doesn't really matter with 1GB or more RAM
but yes - it is huge even relative to linux.
Ah, any insight as to why?
my custom compiled kernel:
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8791402 6 kwi 22:08 /boot//kernel/kernel
only with features i need. linux is AFAIK like
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
And yes FreeBSD kernel is huge. doesn't really matter with 1GB or more
RAM but yes - it is huge even relative to linux.
Ah, any insight as to why?
my custom compiled kernel:
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel
You have to look at the in-memory sizes, not the on-disk sizes.
Linux kernels are very barebones when it comes to what is compiled directly
into the kernel image on disk. Everything else is loaded from modules at
boot time. Especially if using distro-provided kernels. They even use ram
disks /
Hello, Kimmo.
You wrote 9 апреля 2013 г., 21:59:37:
KP Your comparison is far from accurate, include the memory taken by
KP loaded kernel modules on both systems and then you might get some
KP proper numbers.
Linux is known to _work_ on SOHO MIPS boxes, with 4MiB of flash and
16MiB of RAM. You
In order to optimize - in this case for size - we need a way to measure
what should we focus on, and it looks like we don't have it yet.
Would it be possible to write a tool - e.g. by instrumenting LLVM - that
would make it possible to calculate, for every function in the call graph,
the amount
On 9 April 2013 11:47, Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org wrote:
In order to optimize - in this case for size - we need a way to measure
what should we focus on, and it looks like we don't have it yet.
We have a good starting point. We can look at the code/data/bss from
each .o file
On 4/9/2013 1:47 PM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
In order to optimize - in this case for size - we need a way to measure
what should we focus on, and it looks like we don't have it yet.
Would it be possible to write a tool - e.g. by instrumenting LLVM - that
would make it possible to
GSOC posted the list of selected organization for GSOC 2013 and I am highly
happy that FreeBSD is among the selected organization.
I am a third year student interested to work in the field of embedded
system. I applied last year and the title of my project was Kernel Size
Reduction for Embedded
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:28:04PM +, Amit Rawat wrote:
GSOC posted the list of selected organization for GSOC 2013 and I am
highly happy that FreeBSD is among the selected organization.
I am a third year student interested to work in the field of embedded
system. I applied last year
Hi,
Your idea is interesting, but it doesn't fix the underlying problem -
there's just too much code. :(
Adrian
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 20:28:04 +
Amit Rawat aami...@gmail.com wrote:
GSOC posted the list of selected organization for GSOC 2013 and I am
highly happy that FreeBSD is among the selected organization.
I am a third year student interested to work in the field of embedded
system. I
On 4/8/13 4:10 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
Your idea is interesting, but it doesn't fix the underlying problem -
there's just too much code. :(
If you were to API'ify some of the more basic things such as fget,
fdrop, filedesc stuff you could potentially swap out the systems for
simpler
Well, it's relatively easy to experience what it's like.
Reboot your machine with 32mb. Try to do things like bring up network
interfaces. Snark when stupid stuff occurs, like you can't allocate
enough mbufs for the driver RX path _and_ run the ifconfig command to
completion to bring said
On Apr 8, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
However, until a bunch of embedded folks come forward and state what they are
really willing to sacrifice, then we won't really have anything to go on, and
it will be guessing at what will work for a space that not all of us
On 8 April 2013 19:28, Kevin Day toa...@dragondata.com wrote:
Ages ago we had to make things work in 16 or 32MB of total system memory on
i386.
For the most part, disabling every compiled-in option/driver we didn't need
was 90% of the effort. Which options/drivers is going to be totally
1) tar up files
2) encrypt tarball
3) copy encrypted tarball with rcp, ftp, uucp, ...
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hello Community.
My name is Alexander Pronin. I am a GSOC student at The FreeBSD Project.
My project is Parallelization in the ports collection and pkgng utility
I have created wiki page where I described problems that I have to solve and
approaches to solving this problems.
(
http
, but I doubt that it's
worth wasting GSoC time for that. Most people use curl for that just
because Google tells them to. On the other hand, SSH is available in
FreeBSD system in 99% of use cases, and it would be quite easy to setup
secure file transfer.
The final decision should however be made
On 19-5-2012 5:54, Tim Kientzle wrote:
On May 18, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Mel Flynn wrote:
On 17-5-2012 14:53, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:37:44PM +0300, tza...@it.teithe.gr wrote:
Nice. What about curl over the HTTPS protocol?
curl would be ok, except it's not in the
On 17.05.2012 17:28, Eric McCorkle wrote:
As i see we already have sys/boot/efi/libefi/efipart.c that uses
EFI BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL to make part devsw. EFI BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL
provides access to each disk and partition. AFAIK it supports only
GPT and MBR+EBR, so there might be some problems with
On 17-5-2012 14:53, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:37:44PM +0300, tza...@it.teithe.gr wrote:
Nice. What about curl over the HTTPS protocol?
curl would be ok, except it's not in the base system.
For this reason, it's probably best to use tar(1) to package up multiple
files
hi,
first of; grats on getting the project. very interesting.
* Can you recommend a secure way of sending a report from a FreeBSD system
to the Central Collector machine?
i don't know if the use of a gnu tool would conflict with FreeBSD
politics but you could use tar(1) or an equivalent and
On May 18, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Mel Flynn wrote:
On 17-5-2012 14:53, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:37:44PM +0300, tza...@it.teithe.gr wrote:
Nice. What about curl over the HTTPS protocol?
curl would be ok, except it's not in the base system.
For this reason, it's
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:45:24PM +0300, tza...@it.teithe.gr wrote:
In this case Apache is a good choice. I would however recommend using
www/nginx and PHP in FastCGI mode (FPM option in lang/php5 port). This
is a preffered setup for almost all Russian highloaded websites.
At the
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:37:44PM +0300, tza...@it.teithe.gr wrote:
Quoting Mateusz Guzik mjgu...@gmail.com:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:30:20AM +0300, tza...@it.teithe.gr wrote:
Hello Community,
I have the project Automated Kernel Crash Reporting System for
this GSoC and I would like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/16/12 01:32, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
As i see we already have sys/boot/efi/libefi/efipart.c that uses
EFI BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL to make part devsw. EFI BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL
provides access to each disk and partition. AFAIK it supports only
GPT
1 - 100 of 457 matches
Mail list logo
