On 12/1/10 12:01 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Hi Dheeraj,
On 2010-Dec-01 04:19:46 +0530, dheeraj suthardheerajsuthar2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kindly do guide me(as I am new here.) and involve me in some
programming project related to above mentioned fields. Also I am
currently going through project
Hi Dheeraj,
On 2010-Dec-01 04:19:46 +0530, dheeraj suthar dheerajsuthar2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kindly do guide me(as I am new here.) and involve me in some
programming project related to above mentioned fields. Also I am
currently going through project lists on FreeBSD list and will apply
soon to
Hi,
I am a MCA (Masters in Computer Application) student. I have become
quite interested in FreeBSD recently and want to contribute it
through programming tasks.
My current skill set:
Languages: C,C++,Java,Assembly(ATT Intel),Python{esp.good in C,Java}
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:10:35 +0100
Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote:
* Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is a good and useful addition! I think Windows has implemented
a generalization of this (called wait objects or something like
that), which effectively allows a select()- (or in
[bcc: to original list]
Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org writes:
Randall Stewart r...@lakerest.net writes:
I have put together a patch against head that I would like
your opinion of.
But you will probably soon receive a message to take this discussion
to hack...@freebsd.org, and I agree :)
Lets try that again with the right email subscribed to hackers ;-)
R
On Jan 22, 2010, at 6:43 AM, Randall Stewart wrote:
Ivan:
Ok, over we go ;-)
I do want to add this into Head here eventually so if you happen
to have an interest in umtx or kqueue you may want to take a close
look at this
Ivan:
Ok, over we go ;-)
I do want to add this into Head here eventually so if you happen
to have an interest in umtx or kqueue you may want to take a close
look at this patch ;-)
R
On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:27 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
2010/1/22 Randall Stewart r...@lakerest.net:
All:
I have put
* Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is a good and useful addition! I think Windows has implemented a
generalization of this (called wait objects or something like that),
which effectively allows a select()- (or in this case kqueue())-like
syscall to wait on both file descriptors and
On 01/22/10 16:10, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Ivan Vorasivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is a good and useful addition! I think Windows has implemented a
generalization of this (called wait objects or something like that),
which effectively allows a select()- (or in this case kqueue())-like
syscall to
* Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Yes, I was thinking about WaitForMultipleObjects() - I sometimes
wished I had it in FreeBSD :)
FreeBSD already has -- unfortunately it's only accessible from within
the ndisulator. ;-)
--
Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl
WWW: http://80386.nl/
Ivan:
A couple of comments...
On Jan 22, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 01/22/10 16:10, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Ivan Vorasivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is a good and useful addition! I think Windows has
implemented a
generalization of this (called wait objects or something like
On 01/22/10 16:55, Randall Stewart wrote:
If I read the comment at filt_umtxattach() correctly, in the best case
you would need an extension to the kevent structure to add more fields
like data udata (for passing values back and forth between userland
and kernel). I agree with this - it would
On Jan 22, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 01/22/10 16:55, Randall Stewart wrote:
If I read the comment at filt_umtxattach() correctly, in the best
case
you would need an extension to the kevent structure to add more
fields
like data udata (for passing values back and forth
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:55:47AM -0800, Randall Stewart wrote:
On Jan 22, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 01/22/10 16:10, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Ivan Vorasivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is a good and useful addition! I think Windows has
implemented a
generalization of this
On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:55:47AM -0800, Randall Stewart wrote:
On Jan 22, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 01/22/10 16:10, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Ivan Vorasivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is a good and useful addition! I think
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:55:47AM -0800, Randall Stewart wrote:
On Jan 22, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 01/22/10 16:10, Ed Schouten wrote:
* Ivan Vorasivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is a good and useful addition! I think Windows has
Daniel:
Well it may be ugly, but it gets even
uglier on how you have to pass the mtx down
to the kernel with the cond wait variables...
One can do it.. but it will take some additional
changes to the kevent structure which breaks the ABI... which
I was not going to venture down that path :-)
From: Kuzo M. Seseko
Alternative Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My name is Kuzo Mobutu Seseko, the daughter of the late
President
of Republic of Zaire,
now living in exile in South Africa.
The circumstances that led to my living in South Africa at
the moment
cannot be new to you , I
know you
18 matches
Mail list logo
